Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/420,129

Automated Warehouse

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Examiner
HOLMES, JUSTIN
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Daifuku Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1135 granted / 1273 resolved
+37.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1293
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1273 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on January 23, 2024 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: in line 2 the term "as-is" is used, it is unclear as to what this means and needs clarification. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over European Patent No. EP1818285 to Ishida et al. Regarding claim 1, the Ishida patent teaches an automated warehouse comprising: a storage rack 4 comprising a plurality of storage sections capable of storing articles; at least one loading section 8 where loading processing, in which a loading target article among the articles is loaded to the storage rack, is performable; a transport apparatus 6 configured to transport the loading target article from the loading section to any one of the storage sections; and a control unit configured to perform the loading processing and control the transport apparatus, and wherein: each of the articles comprises a wireless tag ID tag in which identification information unique to the article is recorded, the loading section comprises a wireless tag reader 12, 14, 16 configured to read the wireless tag, the loading processing comprises reading processing of reading, with the wireless tag reader, the identification information recorded in the wireless tag of the loading target article, the automated warehouse further comprises a recording unit in which the identification information of the articles is recorded, and in the loading processing. It is also disclosed that the control unit 20 has a database for the ID tags and the information is collated with the data of the article. See Figs. 1 and 2 and the entire patent. However, the Ishida patent lacks a specific teaching that in response to the identification information read in the reading processing not matching any recorded identification information of other articles already recorded in the recording unit, the control unit records the identification information read in the reading processing as the identification information of the loading target article in the recording unit. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the subject invention to modify the Ishida patent to have not matching recorded identification information recorded, as it would have been combining known prior art elements using known methods to provide the predictable result of updating the records of the items which the Ishida patent is already capable of doing to provide a more accurate inventory of the warehouse. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chinese Patent No. CN114590513 to Zhao et al. teaches a wireless tag reading. Japanese Patent No. JP2006341957 to Kitagaki et al. teaches a robot with a tag reader. Japanese Patent No. JP6908683 teaches a robot that reads tags. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN HOLMES whose telephone number is (571)272-3448. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob S Scott can be reached at 571-270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN HOLMES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595127
System and Method for Picking Items
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595126
A CONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589942
STORAGE APPARATUS, A TRANSFER SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME, AND A TRANSFERRING METHOD USING THE TRANSFER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589789
Mobile Platform and Method of Assembly Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592450
BATTERY SYSTEM WITH DIVERTER ASSEMBLY FOR THERMAL PROPAGATION PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1273 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month