Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/420,465

PEDMOS Transistor Devices

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Examiner
WHALEN, DANIEL B
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
816 granted / 1017 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1063
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species Embodiment 1, with corresponding claims 1-5, 7-14, and 16-17, in the reply filed on 06/05/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 6, 15, and 18-22 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected Species Embodiments. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: PEDMOS TRANSISTOR DEVICES COMPRISING P-TYPE SILICON GERMANIUM DRIFT REGION BETWEEN P-TYPE SILICON DRIFT REGION AND P-TYPE SILICON GERMANIUM DRAIN REGION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 and 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over in view of Zhang et al. (US 2008/0197412 A1; hereinafter “Zhang”) in view of Chakravarthi et al. (US 2008/0242032 A1; hereinafter “Chakravarthi”). Regarding claim 1, referring to Figs. 5-6, Zhang teaches a P-type extended drain metal-oxide-semiconductor (PEDMOS) field-effect transistor (FET) (a p-type transistor with source/drain extensions 25) including a Si active layer (a semiconductor region 16 formed of silicon) that includes: (a) a Si channel region (a channel region of 16 between source/drain extensions 25 and 27) having a source-side edge (a left-side of the channel region of 16 facing 25) and a drain-side edge (a right-side of the channel region of 16 facing 27) (paragraphs 4 and 14-15); (b) a P+ SiGe source region (a high concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 40) adjacent the source-side edge of the channel region (paragraphs 18 and 20); (c) a first Si drift region (a drain extension 27 by implanting a region of 16 formed of silicon) having a first side (a left-side of 27) adjacent the drain-side edge of the channel region, and having a second side (a right-side of 27) (paragraph 15); (d) a second P− SiGe drift region (a low level concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 34 and/or a medium level concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 38) having a first side (a left-side of 34/38) adjacent the second side of the first Si drift region, and having a second side (a right-side of 34/38) (paragraphs 16-17); and (e) a P+ SiGe drain region (a high level concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 42) adjacent the second side of the second P− SiGe drift region (paragraphs 18 and 20). While Zhang does not further teach that the Si channel region is an N-type and the first Si drift region is a P-type, it is well known in the art that the p-type transistor would include an n-type channel region and a lightly doped p-type drain drift region. This is evidenced by Chakravarthi teaching a p-type extended drain MOS transistor (a PMOS region 60 with extended source/drain extensions 70), including a n-type channel region (a n-type channel region of 120 between source/drain extensions 70) and a p-type drift layer (a lightly doped p-type drain extension 70) (Fig. 1 and paragraphs 5-8). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of Zhang with that of Chakravarthi in order to provide the predictable n-type channel region and the lightly doped p-type drift region for the p-type transistor. Regarding claim 2, Zhang teaches wherein the active layer is formed on a buried-oxide insulator layer (14) (paragraph 15). Regarding claim 3, Zhang teaches wherein the buried-oxide insulator layer is formed on a substrate (12) (paragraph 15). Regarding claim 4, Zhang in view of Chakravarthi teaches wherein the P+ SiGe source region and the second P− SiGe drift region are shaped to compress the N-type Si channel region (Zhang, a shape of 40 and 34/38 with a channel region therebetween as shown in Fig. 5 and Chakravarthi for the n-type channel region). Regarding claim 5, Zhang in view of Chakravarthi teaches wherein the P+ SiGe source region has a rounded shape adjacent the source-side edge of the N-type channel region and the second P− SiGe drift region has a rounded shape adjacent the drain-side edge of the N-type channel region (See Zhang, Fig. 5 for the rounded shape and Chakravarthi for the n-type channel region). Regarding claim 7, Zhang teaches wherein the Si active layer further includes a doped halo region (paragraph 15 describes “Semiconductor region 16 in this described example is just silicon, as the semiconductor material, that may have background doping and other dopings such as a halo implant”). While Zhang does not explicitly show where the halo implant region is located, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the halo implant region is located between the P+ SiGe source region and the N-type Si channel region as claimed for improving transistor functionality. Regarding claim 8, Zhang in view of Chakravarthi teaches wherein the Si active layer further includes a lightly-doped drain region (25) between the P+ SiGe source region (40) and the N-type Si channel region (Zhang, Fig. 5 and paragraph 15 and Chakravarthi for the n-type channel region). Regarding claim 9, while Zhang does not further teach the Si active layer having a <110> orientation, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the Si active layer (16) from Zhang would have (110) surface orientation for improving hole mobility for the p-type transistor. Claims 10-14 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over in view of Zhang in view of Chakravarthi and Cheng et al. (US 2023/0099156 A1; hereinafter “Cheng”). Regarding claim 10, referring to Figs. 5-6, Zhang teaches an integrated circuit fabricated on a substrate and including: (a) a Si active layer (a semiconductor region 16 formed of silicon) (paragraphs 4 and 14-15) and which includes: (1) a Si channel region (a channel region of 16 between source/drain extensions 25 and 27) having a source-side edge (a left-side of the channel region of 16 facing 25) and a drain-side edge (a right-side of the channel region of 16 facing 27) (paragraphs 4 and 14-15); (2) a P+ SiGe source region (a high concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 40) adjacent the source-side edge of the channel region (paragraphs 18 and 20); (3) a first Si drift region (a drain extension 27 by implanting a region of 16 formed of silicon) having a first side (a left-side of 27) adjacent the drain-side edge of the channel region, and having a second side (a right-side of 27) (paragraph 15); (4) a second P− SiGe drift region (a low level concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 34 and/or a medium level concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 38) having a first side (a left-side of 34/38) adjacent the second side of the first Si drift region , and having a second side (a right-side of 34/38) (paragraphs 16-17); (5) a P+ SiGe drain region (a high level concentration boron-doped SiGe layer 42) adjacent the second side of the second P− SiGe drift region (paragraphs 18 and 20); and (b) a gate structure (a gate structure including at least a gate 22 and a gate dielectric 20) overlying the Si channel region (paragraph 15). Zhang does not further teach that 1) the Si channel region is an N-type and the first Si drift region is a P-type and 2) the Si active layer has a <110> orientation. Regarding 1) the Si channel region is an N-type and the first Si drift region is a P-type and 2) the Si active layer, it is well known in the art that the p-type transistor would include an n-type channel region and a lightly doped p-type drain drift region. This is evidenced by Chakravarthi teaching a p-type extended drain MOS transistor (a PMOS region 60 with extended source/drain extensions 70), including a n-type channel region (a n-type channel region of 120 between source/drain extensions 70) and a p-type drift layer (a lightly doped p-type drain extension 70) (Fig. 1 and paragraphs 5-8). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of Zhang with that of Chakravarthi in order to provide the predictable n-type channel region and the lightly doped p-type drift region for the p-type transistor. Regarding 2) the Si active layer having a <110> orientation, Cheng teaches a p-type field-effect transistor (PFET) comprising (110) crystalline surface orientation for optimal electrical performance of the PFET (paragraph 24). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teaching of Zhang with that of Cheng in order to provide the optimal electrical performance of the PFET. Regarding claim 11, Zhang teaches wherein the Si active layer is formed on a buried-oxide insulator layer (14) (paragraph 15). Regarding claim 12, Zhang teaches wherein the buried-oxide insulator layer is formed on a substrate (12) (paragraph 15). Regarding claim 13, Zhang in view of Chakravarthi teaches wherein the P+ SiGe source region and the second P− SiGe drift region are shaped to compress the N-type Si channel region (Zhang, a shape of 40 and 34/38 with a channel region therebetween as shown in Fig. 5 and Chakravarthi for the n-type channel region). Regarding claim 14, Zhang in view of Chakravarthi teaches wherein the P+ SiGe source region has a rounded shape adjacent the source-side edge of the N-type channel region and the second P− SiGe drift region has a rounded shape adjacent the drain-side edge of the N-type channel region (See Zhang, Fig. 5 for the rounded shape and Chakravarthi for the n-type channel region). Regarding claim 16, Zhang teaches wherein the Si active layer further includes a doped halo region (paragraph 15 describes “Semiconductor region 16 in this described example is just silicon, as the semiconductor material, that may have background doping and other dopings such as a halo implant”). While Zhang does not explicitly show where the halo implant region is located, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the halo implant region is located between the P+ SiGe source region and the N-type Si channel region as claimed for improving transistor functionality. Regarding claim 17, Zhang in view of Chakravarthi teaches wherein the Si active layer further includes a lightly-doped drain region (25) between the P+ SiGe source region (40) and the N-type Si channel region (Zhang, Fig. 5 and paragraph 15 and Chakravarthi for the n-type channel region). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL B WHALEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3418. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached on (571)272-1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL WHALEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707997
POWER MODULES AND RELATED METHODS
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707799
ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE INCLUDING SEMICONDUCTOR NANOCRYSTAL AND CYANIDE GROUP AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707872
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701832
LIGHTING SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF COMBINING VISIBLE AND NON-VISIBLE LIGHT CONVERTING PHOSPHOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696612
PATTERNED QUANTUM DOT FILM LAYER, QUANTUM DOT LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month