Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/420,558

Dynamic Selection of Sounding Reference Signal Frequency Hopping Configurations

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 23, 2024
Examiner
KIR, ALBERT
Art Unit
2485
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
DELL PRODUCTS, L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
332 granted / 498 resolved
+8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
543
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 498 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is a response to an application filed on 01/23/2024, in which claims 1-20 are pending and ready for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 8-12, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kishiyama (US Pat. 8130812 B2). Regarding claim 1, Kishiyama discloses a system, comprising: a processor; and a memory that stores executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, facilitate performance of operations, comprising (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A base station/communication system, also see Fig. 13, including a processor and a memory with instructions is used to perform communication processes.): as part of attaching with a user equipment, determining a first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration for communications with the user equipment (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A first sounding reference signal (SRS) for frequence hopping specification/configuration is determined for communicating with a user equipment (UE).), and communicating the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A first SRS frequence hopping specification/configuration is sent to a UE, during repetition of frequency hopping patterns.); after the attaching with the user equipment, receiving respective first sounding reference signal reports from the user equipment, wherein the respective first sounding reference signal reports are configured according to the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. After connecting with a UE, a first SRS feedback/report from a UE is received and determined in accordance with a first SRS frequency hopping specification/configuration, during repetition of frequency hopping patterns.); in response to identifying that a power consumption of the user equipment satisfies a power limitation criterion, or that a user equipment channel condition satisfies a channel condition criterion (Kishiyama; Col. 3, Ln. 34-46. For determining that a power consumption of a UE requiring/satisfying a power limitation.), modifying the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to a second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A first SRS frequency hopping specification/configuration is changed to a second SRS frequency hopping specification/configuration, during repetition of frequency hopping pattern.), and communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A second SRS frequence hopping specification/configuration is sent to a UE, during repetition of frequency hopping patterns.); and after communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment, receiving respective second sounding reference signal reports from the user equipment, wherein the respective second sounding reference signal reports are configured according to the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. After connecting with a UE, a second SRS feedback/report from a UE is received and determined in accordance with a second SRS frequency hopping specification/configuration, during repetition of frequency hopping patterns.). Claim 8 is directed to a method, comprising a sequence of processing steps corresponding to the same as claimed in claim 1, and is rejected for the same reason of anticipation as outlined above. Regarding claim 9, Kishiyama discloses receiving, by the system from the user equipment, an indication that the user equipment supports sounding reference signal frequency hopping in uplink communications as part of attaching to the user equipment (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A specification/configuration of a UE using SRS FH is received from a UE in uplink communication, also see Col. 10, Ln. 60-64.). Regarding claim 10, Kishiyama discloses a communication that indicates a group of features supported by the user equipment for the uplink communications comprises the indication (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. A specification/configuration indicates different parameters for a UE is provided in an uplink, also see Col. 10, Ln. 60-64.). Regarding claim 11, Kishiyama discloses the indication comprises an information element (Kishiyama; Fig. 12, Col. 11, Ln 48 to Col. 12, Ln. 20. An indication/configuration includes information element.). Regarding claim 12, Kishiyama discloses the system facilitates a cellular network that comprises a primary cell and a group of secondary cells, and wherein communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment comprises (Kishiyama; A base station provides a network including a main cell and neighboring cells, wherein a second SRS FH configuration is sent to a UE.): sending, by the system to the user equipment, a first communication indicative of using the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration with the primary cell (Kishiyama; Col. 11, Ln. 38-54. A first communication for using a second SRS FH configuration is sent for a main cell.); and sending, by the system to the user equipment, a second communication indicative of using the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration with the group of secondary cells (Kishiyama; Col. 11, Ln. 38-54. A second communication for using a second SRS FH configuration is sent for neighboring cells.). Claim 15 is directed to a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, in response to execution, cause a system comprising a processor to perform operations, comprising a sequence of processing steps corresponding to the same as claimed in claim 1, and is rejected for the same reason of anticipation as outlined above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-7 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishiyama (US Pat. 8130812 B2) in view of Wang (US Pub. 20230050730 A1). Regarding claim 2, Kishiyama discloses communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment (Kishiyama; See remarks regarding claim 1 above.) But it does not specifically disclose communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment is performed via a medium access control element message. However, Wang teaches communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment is performed via a medium access control element message (Wang; Para. [0008]. A medium access control element message is used for communicating different SRS frequency hopping patterns/configurations to a UE.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different control messages are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to transmit different SRS resources for achieving optimal power consumption (Wang; Abstract.). Regarding claim 3, modified Kishiyama further teaches communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment is performed via a downlink control information message (Wang; Para. [0008]. A downlink control information message is used for communicating different SRS frequency hopping patterns/configurations to a UE.). Regarding claim 4, Kishiyama discloses the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; See remarks regarding claim 1 above.). But it does not specifically disclose the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a full bandwidth of the user equipment, wherein the power consumption of the user equipment satisfies the power limitation criterion, and wherein the operations further comprise: determining that the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a sub-bandwidth of the user equipment based on the user equipment satisfying the power limitation criterion, and before modifying the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration However, Wang teaches the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a full bandwidth of the user equipment, wherein the power consumption of the user equipment satisfies the power limitation criterion, and wherein the operations further comprise (Wang; Para. [0148]. A first SRS frequency hopping (FH) pattern/configuration corresponds to a full bandwidth of a UE in accordance with a UE power consumption satisfying a criterion.): determining that the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a sub-bandwidth of the user equipment based on the user equipment satisfying the power limitation criterion, and before modifying the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Wang; Para. [0148]. A SRS FH pattern/configuration is determined to be correspond to a narrowband/sub-band of a UE in accordance with a UE power consumption satisfying a criterion before change a first SRS FH configuration to a second SRS FH configuration.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different control messages are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to transmit different SRS resources for achieving optimal power consumption (Wang; Abstract.). Regarding claim 5, Kishiyama discloses the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; See remarks regarding claim 1 above.). But it does not specifically disclose the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a full bandwidth of the user equipment, wherein the user equipment channel condition satisfies the channel condition criterion, and wherein the operations further comprise: determining that the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a sub-bandwidth of the user equipment based on the user equipment channel condition satisfying the power limitation criterion, and before modifying the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration. However, Wang teaches the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a full bandwidth of the user equipment, wherein the user equipment channel condition satisfies the channel condition criterion, and wherein the operations further comprise (Wang; Para. [0148]. A first SRS frequency hopping (FH) pattern/configuration corresponds to a full bandwidth of a UE in accordance with a UE channel condition satisfying a criterion, also see Para. [0145].): determining that the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration corresponds to a sub-bandwidth of the user equipment based on the user equipment channel condition satisfying the power limitation criterion, and before modifying the first sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Wang; Para. [0148]. A SRS FH pattern/configuration is determined to be correspond to a narrowband/sub-band of a UE in accordance with a UE channel condition satisfying a criterion before change a first SRS FH configuration to a second SRS FH configuration, also see Para. [0145].). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different control messages are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to transmit different SRS resources for achieving optimal power consumption (Wang; Abstract.). Regarding claim 6, modified Kishiyama teaches the channel condition criterion corresponds to a defined high mobility status of the user equipment (Wang; Para. [0165]. A channel condition includes a range of subbands corresponding to a high/higher mobility status of a UE.). Regarding claim 7, modified Kishiyama further teaches the channel condition criterion corresponds to a physical location of the user equipment being located at a cell edge of a cellular network that is facilitated by the system (Wang; Para. [0110]. A channel condition criterion corresponds to a UE located at a cell edge.). Regarding claim 19, modified Kishiyama further teaches the criterion corresponds to a power consumption of the user equipment (Wang; Para. [0145, 148]. A criterion corresponds to a power consumption of a UE, also see Para. [0165].). Regarding claim 20, modified Kishiyama further teaches the criterion corresponds to a user equipment channel condition that corresponds to the user equipment (Wang; Para. [0145, 148]. A criterion corresponds to a channel condition of a UE, also see Para. [0165].). Claims 13-14 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kishiyama (US Pat. 8130812 B2) in view of Jacobsson (US Pub. 20250293749 A1). Regarding claim 13, Kishyama discloses the system facilitates a cellular network that comprises a primary cell and a group of secondary cells, and wherein communicating the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration to the user equipment (Kishiyama; A base station provides a network including a main cell and neighboring cells, wherein a second SRS FH configuration is sent to a UE.). But it does not specifically disclose communicating separate c-srs, b-srs, and b-hop values for the primary cell and for at least one respective secondary cell for the group of secondary cells. However, Jacobsson teaches communicating separate c-srs, b-srs, and b-hop values for the primary cell and for at least one respective secondary cell for the group of secondary cells (Jacobsson; Para. [0036]. Separate c-SRS, b-SRS, and b-hop parameters are communicated for respective cells.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different frequency hopping parameters are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to perform precoder candidate restriction for multi-antenna UEs (Jacobsson; Para. [0002].). Regarding claim 14, modifed Kishiyama discloses the at least one respective secondary cell is a first secondary cell, and wherein an omitted c-srs, b-srs, or b-hop value of a second secondary cell of the group of secondary cells indicates maintaining a current c-srs, b-srs, or b-hop value (Jacobsson; Para. [0036]. Separate current c-SRS, b-SRS, and b-hop parameters are not changed/ maintained for respective cells for no update/change being received.). Regarding claim 16, Kishiyama discloses the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; See remarks regarding claim above.). But it does not specifically disclose the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration comprises a c-srs value. However, Jacobsson teaches the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration comprises a c-srs value (Jacobsson; Para. [0036]. A SRS FH pattern/configuration includes a c-SRS, b-SRS, and b-hop parameters.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different frequency hopping parameters are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to perform precoder candidate restriction for multi-antenna UEs (Jacobsson; Para. [0002].). Regarding claim 17, Kishiyama discloses the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; See remarks regarding claim above.). But it does not specifically disclose the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration comprises a b-srs value. However, Jacobsson teaches the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration comprises a b-srs value (Jacobsson; Para. [0036]. A SRS FH pattern/configuration includes a c-SRS, b-SRS, and b-hop parameters.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different frequency hopping parameters are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to perform precoder candidate restriction for multi-antenna UEs (Jacobsson; Para. [0002].). Regarding claim 18, Kishiyama discloses the second sounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration (Kishiyama; See remarks regarding claim above.). But it does not specifically disclose the secondsounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration comprises a b-hop value. However, Jacobsson teaches the secondsounding reference signal frequency hopping configuration comprises a b-hop value (Jacobsson; Para. [0036]. A SRS FH pattern/configuration includes a c-SRS, b-SRS, and b-hop parameters.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the pertinent before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RAN communication system of Kishiyama to adapt a frequency hopping approach, by incorporating Wang’s teaching wherein different frequency hopping parameters are used for SRS frequency hopping, for the motivation to perform precoder candidate restriction for multi-antenna UEs (Jacobsson; Para. [0002].). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Rico Alvarino (US Pub. 20210250943 A1) teaches a communication system that performs support of multiple SRS in the same subframe. Kumar (US Pub. 20250240130 A1) teaches a communication system that allows dynamic selection of sounding reference signal frequence hopping configurations. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALBERT KIR whose telephone number is (571)272-6245. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached at (571) 272-2988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALBERT KIR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 05, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 05, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603997
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING OR DECODING IMAGE BY MEANS OF BLOCK MAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598293
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING OR DECODING IMAGE BY MEANS OF BLOCK MAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598294
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING OR DECODING IMAGE BY MEANS OF BLOCK MAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598311
METHOD FOR PROCESSING IMAGE ON BASIS OF INTER-PREDICTION MODE AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593029
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ENCODING OR DECODING IMAGE BY MEANS OF BLOCK MAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 498 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month