Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/420,928

FOGGING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 24, 2024
Priority
Jan 26, 2023 — provisional 63/441,411
Examiner
GANEY, STEVEN J
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tmk Designs LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1145 granted / 1392 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.8%
+10.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1392 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 19 and 20 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on March 12, 2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-18 in the reply filed on March 12, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 14-16 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being (a)(2) by US 2023/0158523 A1(Nakamoto et al). As to claim 1, Nakamoto et al ‘523 discloses a fogging machine 100 comprising blower assembly 30 including a motor 35 and a turbine 33 coupled to the motor and configured to generate an airflow; a conduit 40 connected to the blower assembly and terminating at a conduit outlet 45 for emitting the airflow; a liquid assembly 10/60/63 connected to the blower assembly for emitting a liquid in the airflow to create a mist; and a support assembly 50A/50B for permitting the fogging machine to be carried by an operator; wherein the motor is an electric motor, see paragraph [0171]. See Figures 1-3 and paragraphs [0032-0356]. As to claim 2, see battery 200A/200B. As to claim 3, see paragraph [0172]. As to claim 14, Nakamoto et al ‘523 discloses a fogging machine 100, comprising: a blower assembly 30 including a housing 31 containing a motor 35 and a turbine 33 coupled to the motor and configured to generate an airflow; a conduit 40 connected to the blower assembly and terminating at a conduit outlet 45 for emitting the airflow; a tank 10 connected to the housing for containing a liquid; a nozzle 63 positioned adjacent to the conduit outlet for emitting the liquid into airflow; a hose 60 fluidly connecting the tank to the nozzle; and a support assembly 50A/50B connected to the housing for permitting the fogging machine to be carried by an operator; wherein the motor is an electric motor. See paragraph [0171. As to claims 15 and 16, see paragraphs [0171,0172]. As to claim 18, see Fig. 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-13 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2023/0158523 A1(Nakamoto et al) in view of Conner et al ‘754. As to claim 4, Nakamoto et al ‘523 discloses a housing for the blower 31 and a housing 20 for the battery, but not one housing for both. Conner et al ‘754 discloses a blower with a housing 12 for the battery and blower. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a housing for both the blower and battery in Nakamoto et al ‘523,a s taught by Conner et al ‘754, since such a modification would consolidate the parts. As to claim 5, see Figs. 1 and 2 of Nakamoto et al ‘523. As to claim 6, see Figs. 1 and 2 of Nakamoto et al ‘523. As to claim 7 see tank 10. As to claim 8, see Figs. 1 and 2. As to claim 9 see nozzle 63, hose 60. As to claim 10 see Fig. 2. As to claim 11 see opening and cap 11. As to claim 12, see paragraph [0148]. As to claims 13 and 17, see battery opening 46, battery 100 and pivoting door 44 in Conner et al ‘754. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide a pivoting door in the housing battery in Nakamoto et al ‘523,as taught by Conner et al ‘754, since such a modification would allow maintenance of the battery. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN J GANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4899. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at (571)270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. STEVEN J. GANEY Primary Examiner Art Unit 3752 /STEVEN J GANEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667211
MULTIPLE-USE DRINKING STRAWS AND THEIR PRODUCTION
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643658
MODULAR SYSTEM FOR STORING AND JETTISONING FLUID AND AIRCRAFT PROVIDED WITH SUCH A SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12629703
SPRAY NOZZLE DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629712
ACCESSORY FOR SIDEWALL SPRINKLER HEAD
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616859
METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR DEFENDING HOME BUILDING PROJECTS FROM WILDFIRE DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A WILDFIRE URBAN INTERFACE (WUI) REGION
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1392 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month