DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-8 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
Claim 1 recites the limitation "wherein after the capacitor is reset by the neuron circuit, and further forms a second membrane voltage based on the second current" in lines 11-12. It is not clear what is meant by this limitation, thus rendering the claim indefinite. Perhaps Applicant meant to say:
wherein after the capacitor is reset by the neuron circuit, the capacitor further forms a second membrane voltage based on the second current
Claim 6 recites the limitation "a first input/output inverted signal" in line 3. It is not clear if this is the same first input/output inverted signal cited in lines 4-5 of claim 2, or some other signal, thus rendering the claim indefinite.
Claim 6 recites the limitation "a second input/output inverted signal" in line 4. It is not clear if this is the same second input/output inverted signal cited in lines 5-6 of claim 2, or some other signal, thus rendering the claim indefinite.
Claim 14 recites the limitation "The method" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Perhaps Applicant meant for this claim to depend from claim 9.
Claims 2-5, 7, and 8 are rejected for inheriting the indefiniteness of parent claim 1.
Allowable Subject Matter
Claims 9-13 are presently allowed.
Claims 1-8 and 14 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM HERNANDEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-8979. The examiner can normally be reached Mon to Fri; 10am to 6pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Taelor Kim can be reached at (571) 270-7166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/WILLIAM HERNANDEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Prosecution Insights