Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/424,004

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INCREASING MUSCLE GROWTH

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2009 — provisional 61/173,004 +10 more
Examiner
HAMA, JOANNE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Novartis AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
25%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 25% of cases
25%
Career Allowance Rate
65 granted / 259 resolved
-34.9% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
287
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
57.3%
+17.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 259 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
CTNF 18/424,004 CTNF 80545 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-fti AIA The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. The preliminary amendments of 09/12/2024 have been entered in full. Claims 19-21 are under consideration. Double Patenting 08-33 AIA The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg , 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman , 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi , 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum , 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel , 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington , 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA/25, or PTO/AIA/26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. 08-34 Claims 21-23 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1,8,28, and 30 of U.S. Patent No. US 8388968. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other for the following reasons. The patented claims generically encompass all antibodies having the same CDR sequences recited in pending claim 20, whereas the pending claims are limited to the antibodies having the recited CDRs within the context of the heavy and light chain sequences, SEQ ID NO: 146 and SEQ ID NO: 141. This limitation is obvious because SEQ ID NO: 146 and SEQ ID NO: 141 are the only sequences disclosed in the patent as having the claimed CDRs. Therefore, one of skill in the art seeking to make and use other species of the patented antibody would use the antibodies of the pending claims as starting material. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL C GAMETT, Ph.D., whose telephone number is (571)272-1853. The examiner can normally be reached on M-W . Please note the examiner’s part-time schedule . Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Hama can be reached on 5712722911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL C GAMETT/Primary Examiner Art Unit 1647 Application/Control Number: 18/424,004 Page 2 Art Unit: 1647 Application/Control Number: 18/424,004 Page 3 Art Unit: 1647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12648929
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING AND/OR TREATING FILARIAL DISEASE
5y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12595300
ANTI-HUMAN P40 PROTEIN DOMAIN ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12559553
IL-31 MODULATORS FOR TREATING FXR-INDUCED PRURITUS
3y 8m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12553897
USE OF CIRCULATING INTERLEUKIN-18 FOR PROGNOSTICATING AND TREATING RECURRENCE IN EARLY STAGE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
3y 8m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12168688
ANTIBODIES AND VARIANTS THEREOF AGAINST PD-L1
4y 5m to grant Granted Dec 17, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
25%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+38.8%)
3y 8m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 259 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month