Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/424,754

MEDICINE FOR TOPICAL WOUND TREATMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 27, 2024
Examiner
MOREAU, NASHARA LOUISE
Art Unit
1655
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Kesaisi (Hainan) Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-60.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
24
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.8%
+3.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group II, claims 3-10, in the reply filed on February 4, 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 3-10 are examined on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim(s) 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 7-8 states that “the plant extract comprises an extract of the tea leaves, an extract of the lotus leaves, an extract of the Galla chinensis, an extract of the Stevia rebaudiana, an extract of the Cyclocarya paliurus, an extract of the Gynura divaricata, an extract of the Taraxacum mongolicum and an extract of the Solamum lycopersicum.” Claims 3 and 4 are drawn to producing an extract from each of the aforementioned above ingredients. Thus, claims 7-8 does not require any further limitations to claims 3 and 4. Claims 9-10 states that “the plant extract comprises an extract of the tea leaves, an extract of the lotus leaves, an extract of the Galla chinensis, an extract of the Stevia rebaudiana, an extract of the Cyclocarya paliurus, an extract of the Gynura divaricata, an extract of the Taraxacum mongolicum and an extract of the Solamum lycopersicum.” Claims 5 and 6 depend on claims 3 and 4, in which, claims 3 and 4 are drawn to producing an extract from each of the aforementioned above ingredients and claims 5 and 6 use the method of extraction from claims 3 and 4 to produce the ratio of the crushed mixture to the sodium carbonate. Thus, claims 9-10 does not require any further limitations to claims 5 and 6. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 3-6 are allowed due to no prior art being available that explicitly discusses the method of using eight natural ingredients (e.g. tea leaves, lotus leaves, Galla chinensis, Stevia rebaudiana, Cyclocarya paliurus, Gymra divaricata, Taraxacum mongolicum and Solanum lycopersicum) to create a medicine for topical wound treatment as stated within the claims of the present invention. The closest prior art for allowance is a Method For Preparing Hair Growth Agent, And Composition Prepared By Said Method by Honda (TW 201338789 A – English translation provided). The Honda reference teaches a method for creating a hair growth agent composition (abstract) that can include the extracts of lotus leaf, Camellia sinensis (e.g. tea leaves), Galla chinensis, stevia (e.g. Stevia rebaudiana) and tomato (e.g. Solanum lycopersicum) (pages 8-14). The reference does not teach the method of crushing and combining the ingredients altogether, wrapping the ingredients within a gauze, then adding sodium carbonate (NaCO3), then taking the mixture and subjecting it to an ethanol extraction and performing multiple levels of fluid extraction, then distillation and finally, freeze drying to obtain the mixture within a powder form. The Honda reference doesn’t anticipate the claimed invention because it does not reference no more than five ingredients from the claimed invention and references a large magnitude of non-claimed ingredients that can be used within the composition for promoting hair growth. The Honda prior art reference doesn’t provide sufficient evidence to arrive at the claimed invention of a preparation method of using plant extracts to create a medicine for topical wound treatment. It is the language found within the claims of the present invention, which has not been found, taught, or suggested by the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nashara L Moreau whose telephone number is (571)272-5804. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday, 8 AM - 4 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anand U Desai can be reached at (571)272-0947. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. NASHARA L MOREAUExaminer, Art Unit 1655 /SUSAN HOFFMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12544416
MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR COMPOSITION PROMOTING BONE DENSITY ENHANCEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 1 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month