Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/424,797

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR A TURN-UP PROCEDURE USING AN ADHESIVE COMPOSITE SHEET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 27, 2024
Examiner
KHAN, TAHSEEN
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Papeltec Overseas Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
564 granted / 924 resolved
-4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
968
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Claims 9-17 in the reply filed on 11/17/25 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 1-8 and 18-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected product, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 11/17/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 9-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rodriguez USPA_20230136940_A1. 1. Regarding Claim 9, Rodriguez discloses a composite comprising a substrate formable for wrapping around an empty web spool, a length of the substrate sufficient to wrap the substrate around an empty web spool multiple times; a first zone coated region comprising a spool face adhesive on a first side of the substrate; a second zone coated region comprising a release coating of the first side of the substrate, the second zone coated region occupying a majority of the first side of the substrate that is not included in the first zone coated region; and a paper web adhesive coating on a second side of the substrate, the paper web adhesive coating comprising an adhesive comprising sufficient binding strength to burst a paper web being spooled on a full web spool (claim 9), and multiple tear away perforations that can be construed as strips that extend across the substrate (elements 111-113 of Fig. 1A; paragraph 0051). 2. Regarding Claim 16, Rodriguez discloses a method of preparing a turn-up composite, the method comprising cutting a substrate to a width target comprising a width of a spool face reduced by a margin distance for one or both ends, and a length based on a number of desired wraps of substrate around the spool face multiplied by a circumference of a paper spool; applying a spool face adhesive to a length of a first side of the substrate equal to or less than a circumference of the spool face; applying a release formulation to an uncoated portion of the first side of the substrate; and applying a paper web adhesive to a second side of the substrate (Claim 16). 3. Regarding Claim 10, Rodriguez discloses having a number of perforations (paragraph 0051). 4. Regarding Claim 11, Rodriguez discloses a spacing between multiple perforations is not equal to a circumference of the empty paper web spool (paragraph 0018). 5. Regarding Claims 12 and 13, Rodriguez discloses an angular cut-out at an end of the paperband composite may be placed upon the empty web spool to start a winding of the paperband composite onto the empty web spool and align angular cut-out in the paperband composite with a position to start a winding of the paperband composite onto the empty web spool in a spiral pattern (paragraph 0018). 6. Regarding Claim 14, Rodriguez discloses a spool face adhesive may have a tensile strength sufficient to hold a paperband composite in place on an empty web spool but not be sufficient to cause damage to a spool face when the paperband composite is removed (paragraph 0019). 7. Regarding Claim 15, Rodriguez discloses a paper web adhesive coating may form a bond having a tensile strength sufficient to adhere to a paper web during a turn-up operation and adhere the wrapped paperband composite to the empty web spool when the paperband composite is torn along a perforation in the paperband composite (paragraph 0020). 8. Regarding Claim 17, Rodriguez discloses cutting an edge of the substrate at an angle to a side edge to form a start of the turn-up paperband composite that may be applied to the spool face (Claim 17). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAHSEEN KHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1140. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays-Saturdays 08:00AM-10:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 5712701547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAHSEEN KHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781 January 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600108
Core and Shell Composite Structural Member
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599187
ARTICLE WITH ADAPTIVE VENTILATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600879
COATED LENS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589556
PULTRUDED FIBRE-REINFORCED STRIP FOR A REINFORCED STRUCTURE, SUCH AS A SPAR CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589576
Laminated Glazing and Process
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+22.4%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month