Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/425,047

BATTERY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2023 — JP 2023-012168
Examiner
LABAZE, EDWYN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
ISUZU MOTORS Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1437 granted / 1607 resolved
+29.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1613
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1607 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Receipt is acknowledged of IDS filed on 06/13/23 & 07/18/2024. Claims 1-2 are presented for examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shimonagata (US 2022/0194262). Re Claim 1: Shimonagata teaches vehicle control device, which includes an acquiring section {herein acquisition unit 61} configured to acquire battery pack information representing a charging amount and a voltage from each of the plurality of battery packs (¶ 27+); a selection section {herein selection unit 63} configured to select a battery pack to be charged or a battery pack to be discharged from among the plurality of battery packs based on the battery pack information (¶ 26+), and a control section {herein VCU 60 serves as the vehicle control device} configured to charge the battery pack to be charged in a charging mode and discharge the battery pack to be discharged in a discharging mode (¶ 18+), wherein when a mode is switched from the charging mode to the discharging mode {herein the selection unit 63 selects a drive battery pack allowed to perform discharge to drive the vehicle 1 from among a plurality of battery packs}, the control section performs a control such that the battery pack to be charged is used as it is as the battery pack to be discharged (¶ 31). Re Claim 2: wherein in the charging mode, the selection section determines, to be a first battery pack to be charged, a battery pack with a voltage {herein the voltage value comparison unit 62 compares values of respective battery packs acquired by the voltage information acquisition unit 61 with each to determine whether a voltage difference between both the battery packs is less than a prescribed value} within a predetermined value with respect to a voltage of a battery pack with a smallest charging amount among the plurality of battery packs, and determines, to be a second battery pack to be charged, a battery pack with a voltage greater than the predetermined value, and the control section starts charging of the first battery pack to be charged first, and then executes charging of the second battery pack to be charged together with the charging of the first battery pack {herein first battery pack 21} to be charged when a charging amount of the first battery pack to be charged reaches a charging amount of the second battery pack {herein second battery pack 22} to be charged, and wherein in the discharging mode, the selection section selects a combination with a largest total charging amount from among combinations of battery packs with a voltage difference within the predetermined value, and determines, to be the battery pack to be discharged, the battery packs included in the combination, and the control section executes discharging of the battery pack to be discharged (¶ 27-30+, 59-64+). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lim (US 2021/0242704) teaches charging management system and method for batteries. Matsuda et al. (US 2022/0289065) teaches management system and electric vehicle. Toya (US 2015/0145476) teaches power supply apparatus. Crowell (US 2005/0275372) teaches power controller for managing arrays of smart battery packs. Furukawa (US 2011/0234164) teaches power supply device capable of equalizing electrical properties of batteries. Jaber et al. (US 2024/0154449) teaches management of electrical storage capacity of battery pack system. Trippel et al. (US 2022/0131391) teaches mode-based disabling of communication bus of a battery management system. Uchida (US 2014/0021923) teaches electrical storage system and control method for electrical storage system. Zhao (US 12,128,788) teaches system and application based on modular battery packs. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWYN LABAZE whose telephone number is (571)272-2395. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mr. STEVE PAIK can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWYN LABAZE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748937
VALID WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BUILDING ACCESS
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748935
GARMENT SORTING AND PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743592
SENSOR ENABLED LOCATION AWARENESS SYSTEM
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737790
SELF-CONTAINED, AI-RELATED CARD AND SPORTS CARD GRADING MACHINE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738746
Solar Panel Charging Block and Load Outlets
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.4%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1607 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month