Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/425,730

Air Filtration Housing

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
LAWRENCE JR, FRANK M
Art Unit
1776
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Wal Fuel Systems Usa Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1172 granted / 1399 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1433
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1399 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation In the claims, the phrase “across the outlet passage” is given its broadest reasonable interpretation because is it not defined in the specification. Figures 2, 3 and 5 appear to show the baffle and row of teeth extending across the inlet passage, so the outlet passage is taken to mean any part of the flow path between the inlet and the outlet. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-12, 14 and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Humbert, Jr. et al. (3,508,383). Humbert, Jr. et al. ‘383 teach an air filter comprising a filter housing (2) with a cylindrical middle wall (2) extending between upper (3’) and lower (9) end caps and defining an internal cavity that includes a cylindrical filter media (10). A middle clamp ring (5) delineates the middle part into an upper part (3) including an air inlet (7) and a lower part (4), while an air outlet (8) extends through the upper end cap. An inlet baffle (29) is connected to the upper end cap via a bold (23) and seal (45) and surrounds the upper end of the filter. The baffle (29) functions as a frame that supports a row of rectangular prismatic spaced teeth (vanes 40) that function to evenly distribute air away from the outlet and over the filter. The teeth extend over an air outlet path downstream of the inlet and also extend over the upper outlet path from a side perspective. The air inlet (7) is a pipe that has a circular cross-section. An axis of the air inlet is transverse to the housing wall and an axis of the outlet is transverse to the entrance axis (see figures, col. 2, line 5 to col. 3, line 29). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Humbert, Jr. et al. ‘383 in view of Klug et al. (6,419,718). Humbert, Jr. et al. ‘383 disclose all of the limitations of the claims except that there is a second baffle extending from the other end of the housing. Klug et al. 718 discloses a cylindrical gas filter arrangement with an inlet baffle skirt and a second baffle extending from an opposite end (see abstract, figure 2). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the filter of Humbert, Jr. et al. ‘383 by using a second baffle in order to distribute gas flow and guide separated residue to a waste outlet. Claim(s) 2, 3 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Humbert, Jr. et al. ‘383 in view of DE 102010008273 A1. Humber, Jr. et al. ‘383 disclose all of the limitations of the claims except that the entrance axis intersects the housing wall to define a preferred angle therebetween. DE ‘273 discloses a cylindrical air filter with an air inlet (26) that can be curved and contoured with a vessel wall (44) to form a nozzle (30) with an outflow opening (32) (see figures 5-8, abstract, pages 6-7 of the machine-generated English translation). Regarding the angle, a round tangential inlet pipe will have a center axis that intersects the vessel wall with an angle of about 60° (looking down on the filter, the angle between the inlet pipe axis and a line tangential to the vessel wall). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the filter of Humbert, Jr. et al. ‘383 by using the angled inlet of DE ‘273 in order to provide for a swirling inlet flow that distributes gas and particulates evenly around the filter. Regarding the exact angle, the examiner understand that the drawings are not to be taken to scale, however absent a proper showing of criticality or unexpected results, the angle is considered to be a parameter that would have been routinely optimized by one having ordinary skill in the art in order to facilitate more even flow distribution over the filter surface. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The additional references listed on the attached PTO-892 form disclose fluid filter arrangements and inlet baffles. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANK LAWRENCE whose telephone number is (571)272-1161. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dieterle can be reached at 571-270-7872. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRANK M LAWRENCE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1776 fl
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601073
H2 DRYER FOR POWER PLANT USING ELECTROLYZER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594523
MEMBRANE CAPTURE OF CO2 FROM REFINERY EMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595960
ADSORBER, PURIFICATION SYSTEM, AND PURIFICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592404
HUMIDIFIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582940
MEMBRANE PRECONCENTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE FROM EXHAUST GAS SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.8%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1399 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month