Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/425,745

METHODS FOR PROMOTING OSTEOCHONDRAL CELL AND TISSUE GROWTH INCLUDING IN LARGE LESIONS AND IN POPULATIONS AT RISK

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Priority
Aug 03, 2021 — provisional 63/228,620 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, SUSAN T
Art Unit
1615
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Cartiheal (2009) Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
643 granted / 1025 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1069
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.4%
+38.4% vs TC avg
§102
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1025 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recited the phrase “said defect site” in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Was it a lesion site that this was referring to? Claim 25 recited the phrase “said subject” in lines 6-7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. There was subject in the population, and there was subject in need of the treatment. The subject recited in lines 6-7 is not quite clear as to which one. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Altschuler US 2016/0184477 (‘477) A1, in view of Altschuler US 20180154041 A1 (‘041). Altschuler teaches a solid substrate comprising coral or coral derivative such as aragonite, calcite, mixtures thereof, or other polymorphs of the same for promoting cell or tissue growth or restored function, or a process for obtaining same, which solid substrate is characterized by substantial surface roughness (Ra) as measured by scanning electron microscopy or atomic force microscopy. Solid substrate is characterized by a specific fluid uptake capacity value of at least 75%, which specific fluid uptake capacity value is determined by establishing a spontaneous fluid uptake value divided by a total fluid uptake value. See Abstract and paragraphs 0019-0020. The solid substrate is of any desired shape. In one embodiment, coral may be machined into a variety of configurations, and quite complex shapes such as cylindrical structures and threaded structures may be formed by appropriate machine or other processing, such as chemical processing. In another embodiment, coral may be shaped to form solid blocks, rods or granular forms. In one embodiment, coralline materials are shaped in such a way as to conform to the shape of a desired tissue structure or to fill gap and contour defects in a potential implantation site. In one embodiment, coral is implanted in an orientation that allows it to contact the maximum surface area of an adjacent-located tissue structure. In some embodiments, the solid substrate comprises a hollow or hollows along a Cartesian coordinate axis of said solid substrate. See paragraphs 0129-0132. The size of coral solid substrates may be any size that would be useful for the purposes of the present invention, as would be known to one of skill in the Art depending on the purpose. For example and in one embodiment, the solid substrate may be substantially the same size as the structure it is meant to replace, while in another embodiment, the solid substrate or a portion thereof may be the size of a defect, fissure or fracture such that it may be placed therein to enhance/replace tissue formation/function in a discrete location. In one embodiment, a coral for use in a solid substrate of this invention comprises an average void diameter, average pore size or a combination thereof appropriate for cell seeding and/or development of vasculature. See paragraph 0133. In some embodiments, solid substrates for use in osteochondral therapy or repair may make use of a substrate that is cylindrical or oval in shape and in some embodiments, solid substrates of this invention and/or for use in the kits and methods as described may have a diameter of about 5-15 mm, and a height of about 5-25 mm. In some embodiments, the solid substrate has a diameter of about 1-35 mm, and a height of about 1-45 mm, or about 5-40 mm, and a height of about 5-60 mm, or about 5-15 mm, and a height of about 5-45 mm, 5-30 mm, 15-60 mm, or larger. For example, and in some embodiments, solid substrates of this invention and/or for use in the kits and methods as described may make use of a substrate that is cylindrical or oval in shape and in some embodiments, solid substrates of this invention and/or for use in the kits and methods as described may have a diameter in the nanometer or micrometer scale. In some embodiments, solid substrates for use in osteochondral therapy or repair may make use of a substrate that is cylindrical or oval in shape and has a diameter of about 1-100 nm, or in some embodiments, having a diameter of about 50-1000 nm, or in some embodiments, having a diameter of about 10-2000 nm, or in some embodiments, having a diameter of about 100-4000 nm. In some embodiments, solid substrates for use in osteochondral therapy or repair may make use of a substrate that is cylindrical or oval in shape and has a diameter of about 1-100 μm, or in some embodiments, having a diameter of about 50-1000 μm, or in some embodiments, having a diameter of about 10-2000 μm, or in some embodiments, having a diameter of about 100-4000 μm. See paragraphs 0137-0138. The solid substrate consisting of two phrases such as polymer coating a solid substrate is found in paragraphs 0233-0235 and 0315. Method of treating or repairing is found in paragraphs 0236-0237, 0257-0263, 0323-0325, and Examples. In other embodiments, such solid substrate may be administered to a subject with an osteochondral defect, where both bone and cartilage tissue are in need of repair as part of the pathogenesis of the disorder. The solid substrates according to this aspect are in some embodiments, particularly suited for such applications. See paragraph 0131. Altshuler ‘477 does not expressly teach solid substrate having at least one substantially flat cross section. Altschuler ‘041 teaches a solid substrate for promoting cell or tissue growth or restored function, which solid substrate comprises a coral or coral derivative, is characterized by a specific fluid uptake capacity value of at least 75% or is characterized by having a contact angle value of less than 60 degrees, when in contact with a fluid or which solid substrate is an allograft or autograft and which solid substrate is further characterized by tapered sides. In some embodiments, the invention provides an optimized solid substrate for promoting cell or tissue growth or restored function, which solid substrate comprises a coral or coral derivative, is characterized by a specific fluid uptake capacity value of at least 75% or is characterized by having a contact angle value of less than 60 degrees, when in contact with a fluid or which solid substrate is an allograft or autograft and which solid substrate is further characterized by at least one substantially flat cross section at a terminus of said solid substrate and tapered sides. In some embodiments, the invention provides an optimized solid substrate for promoting cell or tissue growth or restored function, which solid substrate comprises a coral or coral derivative, is characterized by a specific fluid uptake capacity value of at least 75% or is characterized by having a contact angle value of less than 60 degrees, when in contact with a fluid or which solid substrate is an allograft or autograft and which solid substrate is further characterized by comprising tapered sides at an angle of from 0.75 to about 4 degrees from a longitudinal axis along said solid substrate. See paragraphs 0012-0014. Thus, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to optimize the teaching of the Altschuler ‘477 reference with the solid substrate in view of the teaching of Altschuler ‘041 with the expectation to obtain a substrate useful for the delivery of coral for the treatment of osteochondral or bone lesion in a subject. This is because the ‘041 reference teaches solid substrates having the claimed cross section is known and useful in the art. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUSAN T TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-0606. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30 am-5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ROBERT A. WAX can be reached at 571-272-0623. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUSAN T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661408
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING BUPROPION AND CYSTEINE
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653791
TRIMODAL, PRECISION-TIMED PULSATILE RELEASE TABLET
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12653789
ADAGRASIB SOLID PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642762
ALLERGENIC PROTEIN FORMULATIONS FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12605393
NEW COMPOSITIONS FOR ORAL OR NASAL USE
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+35.7%)
3y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1025 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month