Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/425,933

BEAM DIVERGENCE CONTROL WITHOUT CREATION OF BORESIGHT OR OTHER ERRORS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
BOURQUINE, MACKENZI TATE
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Raytheon Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
57 granted / 71 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 71 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings filed on 1/29/2024 are acknowledged and accepted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-10, 12-13, and 15-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kajikawa (US20120012758A1, patent of record in the IDS dated 7/30/2025). With respect to Claim 1, Kajikawa discloses an apparatus comprising: a half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) configured to alter a polarization ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam) of an input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]); and multiple lenses (Fig. 1-- elements 7 and 9, lenses; [0046]) configured to reshape the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) and generate an output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]), wherein at least one of the lenses comprises one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]); wherein a divergence ([0020] and [0051]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via elements 4 and 7) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]) is based on the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) and the at least one of the lenses comprising the one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]); and wherein the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) is configured to be rotated or repositioned ([0020]: element 4 is rotatable about the optical axis) in order to adjust the divergence ([0020]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via rotatable element 4) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]). With respect to Claim 2, Kajikawa discloses the apparatus of Claim 1, and discloses further comprising: an actuator ([0048]: an actuator may be employed) configured to rotate ([0020]: element 4 is rotatable about the optical axis) the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) so that the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) obtains a desired rotation and provides a desired adjustment to the polarization ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam) of the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]). With respect to Claim 4, Kajikawa discloses the apparatus of Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the multiple lenses (Fig. 1-- elements 7 and 9, lenses; [0046]) comprise a negative lens and a positive lens ([0051]: element 7 may be negative; [0046]: element 9 is a positive converging lens). With respect to Claim 5, Kajikawa discloses the apparatus of Claim 4, and further discloses wherein the negative lens ([0051]: element 7 may be negative) comprises the one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]). With respect to Claim 7, Kajikawa discloses the apparatus of Claim 1, and further discloses wherein the one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]) comprise at least one of: quartz ([0018]: the birefringent material is preferably optical crystalline quartz), titanium dioxide (TiO2), yttrium orthovanadate (YVO4), calcite (CaCO3), lithium niobate (LiNBO3), magnesium fluoride (MgF2), or silicon dioxide (SIO2). With respect to Claim 8, Kajikawa discloses a system comprising: an optical source (Fig. 1—element 1, light source; [0046]) configured to generate an input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]); a half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) configured to alter a polarization ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam) of the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]); multiple lenses (Fig. 1-- elements 7 and 9, lenses; [0046]) configured to reshape the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) and generate an output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]), wherein at least one of the lenses comprises one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]), and wherein a divergence of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]) is based on the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) and the at least one of the lenses comprising the one or more birefringent materials ([0020] and [0051]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via elements 4 and 7); and an actuator ([0048]: an actuator may be employed) configured to rotate ([0020]: element 4 is rotatable about the optical axis) or reposition the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) in order to adjust the divergence ([0020]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via rotatable element 4) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]). With respect to Claim 9, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 8, and discloses further comprising: a controller configured to control the actuator ([0048]: an actuator controlled by a controller may be employed) based on a desired divergence of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]). With respect to Claim 10, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 8, and further discloses wherein the actuator ([0048]: an actuator may be employed) is configured to rotate ([0020]: element 4 is rotatable about the optical axis) the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) so that the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) obtains a desired rotation and provides a desired adjustment to the polarization ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam) of the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]). With respect to Claim 12, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 8, and further discloses wherein the multiple lenses (Fig. 1-- elements 7 and 9, lenses; [0046]) comprise a negative lens and a positive lens ([0051]: element 7 may be negative; [0046]: element 9 is a positive converging lens). With respect to Claim 13, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 12, and further discloses wherein the negative lens ([0051]: element 7 may be negative) comprises the one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]). With respect to Claim 15, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 8, and further discloses wherein the one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]) comprise at least one of: quartz ([0018]: the birefringent material is preferably optical crystalline quartz), titanium dioxide (TiO2), yttrium orthovanadate (YVO4), calcite (CaCO3), lithium niobate (LiNBO3), magnesium fluoride (MgF2), or silicon dioxide (SIO2). With respect to Claim 16, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 8, and further discloses wherein the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]) comprises a high-energy laser (HEL) beam or a target illumination laser (TIL) beam ([0026]: the target is illuminated by the laser beam). With respect to Claim 17, Kajikawa discloses a method comprising: altering a polarization of an input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) using a half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam); and reshaping the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) using multiple lenses (Fig. 1-- elements 7 and 9, lenses; [0046]) to generate an output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]), wherein at least one of the lenses comprises one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]); wherein a divergence ([0020] and [0051]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via elements 4 and 7) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]) is based on the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) and the at least one of the lenses comprising the one or more birefringent materials (Fig. 1—element 7, birefringent lens; [0046]); and wherein the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) is configured to be rotated or repositioned ([0020]: element 4 is rotatable about the optical axis) in order to adjust the divergence ([0020]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via rotatable element 4) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]). With respect to Claim 18, Kajikawa discloses the method of Claim 17, and further discloses comprising: rotating the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) to adjust the divergence ([0020]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via rotatable element 4) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]). With respect to Claim 19, Kajikawa discloses the method of Claim 17, and further discloses comprising: repositioning the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) to adjust the divergence ([0020]: intensity ratios of a plurality of beam waists can be altered via rotatable element 4) of the output optical beam (Fig. 1-- elements 12 and 13, output light; [0052]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kajikawa (US20120012758A1, patent of record in the IDS dated 7/30/2025) in view of Tayebati (JP2019523137A). With respect to Claim 3, Kajikawa discloses the apparatus of Claim 1, and discloses further comprising: an actuator ([0048]: an actuator may be employed) configured to move the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]). However, Kajikawa does not disclose an actuator configured to move the half waveplate into and out of a path of the input optical beam. Kajikawa and Tayebati are related as both pertaining to the field of optical systems. Tayebati does disclose an actuator (Fig. 5—element 535, translation stage; [0068]) configured to move an optical element into and out of a path of the input optical beam (Fig. 5—element 525 may move optical elements up and down out of the optical path). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the apparatus of Kajikawa with the translation stage of Tayebati in order to create a device which may move optical elements along two or three axis (Tayebati, [0068]). With respect to Claim 11, Kajikawa discloses the system of Claim 8, and further discloses wherein the actuator ([0048]: an actuator may be employed) is configured to move the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]). However, Kajikawa does not disclose an actuator configured to move the half waveplate into and out of a path of the input optical beam. Kajikawa and Tayebati are related as both pertaining to the field of optical systems. Tayebati does disclose an actuator (Fig. 5—element 535, translation stage; [0068]) configured to move an optical element into and out of a path of the input optical beam (Fig. 5—element 525 may move optical elements up and down out of the optical path). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the apparatus of Kajikawa with the translation stage of Tayebati in order to create a device which may move optical elements along two or three axis (Tayebati, [0068]). Claims 6, 14, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kajikawa (US20120012758A1) in view of Campbell (US20070159701A1). With respect to Claim 6, Kajikawa discloses the apparatus of Claim 1, and discloses further comprising: a quarter waveplate (Fig. 1—element 8, quarter-wave plate; [0046]) configured to convert a circular polarization of the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) into a linear polarization ([0056]: element 8 converts linear polarization of the laser beam P transmitted through the birefringent lens 7 into circular polarization) and the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) alters the polarization of the input optical beam ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam). However, Kajikawa does not disclose a quarter waveplate before the half waveplate. Kajikawa and Campbell are related as pertaining to the field of optical systems. Campbell does disclose a quarter waveplate (Fig. 1A—element W2, quarter wave plate; [0042]) before the half waveplate (Fig. 1A—element 120, polarization rotator; [0043]) alters the polarization of the input optical beam (Fig. 1A—element 170, incoming light; [0041]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to place the quarter waveplate before the half waveplate in order to create a device which may serve as a backup in case the half waveplate does not rotate correctly (Campbell, [0042]). With respect to Claim 14, Kajikawa discloses system of Claim 8, and discloses further comprising: a quarter waveplate (Fig. 1—element 8, quarter-wave plate; [0046]) configured to convert a circular polarization of the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) into a linear polarization ([0056]: element 8 converts linear polarization of the laser beam P transmitted through the birefringent lens 7 into circular polarization) and the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) alters the polarization of the input optical beam ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam). However, Kajikawa does not disclose a quarter waveplate before the half waveplate. Kajikawa and Campbell are related as pertaining to the field of optical systems. Campbell does disclose a quarter waveplate (Fig. 1A—element W2, quarter wave plate; [0042]) before the half waveplate (Fig. 1A—element 120, polarization rotator; [0043]) alters the polarization of the input optical beam (Fig. 1A—element 170, incoming light; [0041]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to place the quarter waveplate before the half waveplate in order to create a device which may serve as a backup in case the half waveplate does not rotate correctly (Campbell, [0042]). With respect to Claim 20, Kajikawa discloses the method of Claim 17, and further discloses comprising: converting a circular polarization of the input optical beam (Fig. 1-- element P, laser beam; [0046]) into a linear polarization ([0056]: element 8 converts linear polarization of the laser beam P transmitted through the birefringent lens 7 into circular polarization) and the half waveplate (Fig. 1-- element 4, half-wave plate; [0046]) alters the polarization of the input optical beam ([0047]: element 4 rotates the electric field vector of the laser beam). However, Kajikawa does not disclose a quarter waveplate before the half waveplate. Kajikawa and Campbell are related as pertaining to the field of optical systems. Campbell does disclose a quarter waveplate (Fig. 1A—element W2, quarter wave plate; [0042]) before the half waveplate (Fig. 1A—element 120, polarization rotator; [0043]) alters the polarization of the input optical beam (Fig. 1A—element 170, incoming light; [0041]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to place the quarter waveplate before the half waveplate in order to create a device which may serve as a backup in case the half waveplate does not rotate correctly (Campbell, [0042]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Bor (US 20180360657 A1) discloses aspects of the instant invention, see Fig. 2 and [0032]-[0046]. Curatu (US 20120271286 A1) discloses aspects of the instant invention, see Fig. 4 and [0051]-[0054]. Omura (US 20070296941 A1) discloses aspects of the instant invention, see Fig. 1 and [0045]-[0069]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MACKENZI BOURQUINE whose telephone number is (571)272-5956. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 - 4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pinping Sun can be reached at (571) 270-1284. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MACKENZI BOURQUINE/ Examiner, Art Unit 2872 /WILLIAM R ALEXANDER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596326
HOLOGRAPHIC OPTICAL DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593975
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING REFRACTION FEATURES OF BOTH FIRST AND SECOND EYES OF A SUBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12566310
ACTUATOR FOR DRIVING ZOOM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560848
DISPLAY PANEL STRUCTURE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554148
OPHTHALMIC OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPHTHALMIC DEVICE, AND OPHTHALMIC SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+11.5%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 71 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month