Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 18/426,376

PROCESS FOR SELECTIVE PURIFICATION OF LITHIUM FROM AN AQUEOUS LITHIUM SALT-CONTAINING SOLUTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Priority
Feb 17, 2023 — provisional 63/446,364
Examiner
BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Aquatech International LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
108 granted / 133 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
170
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 133 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-7 in the reply filed on September 1st, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 8-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on September 1st, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Marston (WO 2019/221932 A1). Regarding claim 1, Marston teaches a process for selectively purifying a lithium product stream from an aqueous lithium salt-containing solution in a continuous mode (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053]-[0064]), said process comprising the steps of: introducing said aqueous lithium salt-containing solution to an arrangement of three or more packed-bed columns in series each filled with a lithium selective sorbent (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], zones A, B, C, and D are in series), wherein at least two of said three or more columns are at an adsorption stage (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], loading zone B), with one at a leading lithium chloride adsorption stage (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], first set of 3 columns in loading zone B) and one or more at a trailing lithium chloride adsorption stage (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], following 5 sets of 3 columns in loading zone B), and at least one of said three or more columns is simultaneously at a lithium chloride desorption stage (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], elution zone D); flowing said aqueous lithium salt-containing solution through said at least two of said three or more columns at a leading lithium chloride adsorption stage and a trailing lithium chloride adsorption stage to adsorb lithium chloride from the aqueous lithium salt-containing solution and respectively form a fully-saturated sorbent and a partially-saturated sorbent (Marston, Fig. 5, [0055], “The feedstock brine 413, which can be the polished geothermal brine (stream 54 in Figure 4A) or a salar, continental or other non-geothermal feedstock brine, is pumped to the adsorbent bed(s) 402 in the loading zone B with a predetermined elution time sufficient to completely or almost completely exhaust the lithium selective adsorbent, and the depleted brine exiting the loading zone B is sent to raffinate 414.”; Exhausting the lithium selective adsorbent would naturally cause the leading lithium chloride adsorption stage to first become fully-saturated, as the solution comes into contact with this stage first.); flowing a desorbent fluid through said at least one of said three or more columns at a lithium chloride desorption stage to desorb lithium chloride from the fully-saturated sorbent in a column from a leading lithium chloride adsorption stage of a previous cycle in an eluate stream (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], “Brine fluid flow through the CCAD circuit 400 is controlled by pumping flow rates and/or predetermined indexing of a central multi-port valve system or of the adsorbent beds 402, creating a process where the adsorption beds 402 continually cycle through the individual process zones A, B, C and D.”; [0057], “Then, an eluant (stripping solution) 416 is pumped countercurrent to the adsorbent advance (fluid flow is illustrated as right to left, while the adsorbent beds movement is illustrated as left to right) into the elution zone D to produce an enhanced lithium product stream 417.” Thus, having cycled to the right, the previous leading lithium chloride adsorption stage column becomes a trailing adsorption stage column, and pumping eluant countercurrent is desorbing lithium chloride from the fully-saturated sorbent in a column from a leading lithium chloride adsorption stage of a previous cycle.); and recovering a lithium product stream from the eluate stream (Marston, Fig. 5, [0056, enhanced lithium product stream 417), wherein when the lithium selective sorbent in said column at a leading lithium chloride adsorption stage is fully-saturated with lithium chloride, said column transitions directly to said lithium chloride desorption stage to desorb lithium chloride once appropriate void volume is displaced (Marston, Fig. 5, [0056]); said column at a trailing lithium chloride adsorption stage transitions directly to said leading lithium chloride adsorption stage for further adsorption of lithium chloride, and said column at a lithium chloride desorption stage transitions directly to said trailing lithium chloride adsorption stage for initial adsorption of lithium chloride once appropriate void volume is displaced (Marston, Fig. 5, [0053], “Brine fluid flow through the CCAD circuit 400 is controlled by pumping flow rates and/or predetermined indexing of a central multi-port valve system or of the adsorbent beds 402, creating a process where the adsorption beds 402 continually cycle through the individual process zones A, B, C and D.”; [0056]) without any intermediate washing stages of the media between any of said transitions (Marston, Fig. 5). Regarding claim 2, Marston teaches the process of claim 1, as discussed above, wherein said aqueous lithium salt-containing solution is a naturally occurring solution or a synthetic solution (Marston, [0001]). Regarding claim 3, Marston teaches the process of claim 1, as discussed above, wherein said lithium selective sorbent is a molecular sieve adsorbent (Marston, [0060]). Regarding claim 4, Marston teaches the process of claim 1, as discussed above, wherein said desorption step in step c) is counter current with respect to said adsorption stage in step b) (Marston, Fig. 5, [0057]). Regarding claim 5, Marston teaches the process of claim 1, as discussed above, wherein the desorbent fluid is water (Marston, [0057]). Regarding claim 6, Marston teaches the process of claim 1, as discussed above, wherein the desorbent fluid is a recycled process stream (Marston, [0058], eluant 416 produced from recycle stream 419). Regarding claim 7, Marston teaches the process of claim 1, as discussed above, wherein the aqueous lithium salt-containing solution is subject to a pre-treatment step of mechanical pre-treatment (Marston, [0052], “In addition, GMF can be used to reduce total suspended solids (TSS) to below 10 ppm before introducing the brine solution.” GMF is granular media filtration; “The bulk of the organic material can be removed by a device such as an API oil-water separator.”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY J. BAUM whose telephone number is (571)270-0895. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer can be reached at 571-270-3590. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZACHARY JOHN BAUM/Examiner, Art Unit 1736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767548
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM HYDROXIDE
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767531
STEEL SMELTING METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758473
SURFACE-TREATED MAGNESIUM OR CALCIUM ION-CONTAINING MATERIALS AS WHITE PIGMENTS IN ORAL CARE COMPOSITIONS
4y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12747162
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM HYDROXIDE
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742226
INTEGRATION OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION WITH SELECTIVE HYDROMETALLURGICAL RECOVERY OF METAL VALUES
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 133 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month