Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/426,471

WORK TOOL ENGAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UTILITY VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
SHAAWAT, MUSSA A
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
665 granted / 876 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§103
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 876 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Velde et al., US pg. pub. No. (2023/0030029) referred to hereinafter as Velde. The applied reference has a common assignee with the instant application. Based upon the earlier effectively filed date of the reference, it constitutes prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). This rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) might be overcome by: (1) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(a) that the subject matter disclosed in the reference was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor of this application and is thus not prior art in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(A); (2) a showing under 37 CFR 1.130(b) of a prior public disclosure under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) if the same invention is not being claimed; or (3) a statement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) establishing that, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, the subject matter disclosed in the reference and the claimed invention were either owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person or subject to a joint research agreement. As per claim 1, Velde teaches a utility vehicle comprising: a main frame; a work tool configured to move relative to the main frame to move a material on a surface (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, figs 1-4); a ground sensing apparatus proximate the work tool, wherein the ground sensing apparatus is configured to detect contact between the work tool and the surface (see at least abstract, Para 21, 23, figs 1-4); a non-transitory computer-readable memory storing operation information (see at least abstract, Para 3-4,); and an electronic processor configured to: receive image data captured by the ground sensing apparatus as the work tool passes over the surface (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23,), determine if the work tool is in contact with the surface based on the image data (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23,). As per claim 2, Velde teaches a utility vehicle of claim 1, wherein the work tool comprises one or more of a blade, a bucket, a scraper, and a roller (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23, figs 1-4). As per claim 3, Velde teaches a utility vehicle of claim 1, wherein the ground sensing apparatus comprises a lidar sensor, a sonic sensor, an ultra-sonic sensor, or a camera (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23, figs 1-4). As per claim 4, Velde teaches a utility vehicle of claim 1, wherein the electronic processor is further configured to generate as built data for the surface after the work tool has passed over the surface (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23, figs 1-4). As per claim 5, Velde teaches a utility vehicle of claim 4, wherein the electronic processor is further configured to compare the as built data for the surface to a grade control data for the surface, and generate a corrected data for the surface (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23, figs 1-4). As per claim 6, Velde teaches a utility vehicle of claim 4, further comprising a display, and wherein the processor is further configured to display one or more of the surface, the grade control data, and the as built data on the display (see at least abstract, Para 3-4, 21, 23, figs 1-4). As per claim 7, Velde teaches a grade monitoring system for a work vehicle that operates on a surface (see at least Para 3-4, 21, 23), the grade monitoring system comprising: a work tool configured to move a material on the surface where the work tool is configured to move relative to a main frame (see at least Para 3-4, figs 1-4); a ground sensing apparatus proximate the work tool, wherein the ground sensing apparatus is configured to detect contact between the work tool and the surface (see at least Para 21, 23); a non-transitory computer-readable memory storing operation information (see at least Para 3-4); and an electronic processor configured to: receive image data captured by the ground sensing apparatus coupled with the work tool as the work tool passes over the surface (see at least Para 3-4, 21, 23), determine if the work tool is in contact with the surface based on the image data, generate, based on the image data, as built data for the surface after the work tool has passed over the surface (see at least Para 21, 23). As per claims 8-15, the limitations of claims 8-15 are similar to the limitations of claims 1-7 therefore they are rejected based on the same rationale. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schau et al., US pg. pub. No. (2022/0081877) referred to hereinafter as Schau. As per claim 1, Schau teaches a utility vehicle comprising: a main frame; a work tool configured to move relative to the main frame to move a material on a surface (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8); a ground sensing apparatus proximate the work tool, wherein the ground sensing apparatus is configured to detect contact between the work tool and the surface (see at least abstract, Para 54, 55 figs 6-8); a non-transitory computer-readable memory storing operation information (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8); and an electronic processor configured to: receive image data captured by the ground sensing apparatus as the work tool passes over the surface (see at least abstract, Para 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8), determine if the work tool is in contact with the surface based on the image data (see at least abstract, Para 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claim 2, Schau teaches a utility vehicle of claim 1, wherein the work tool comprises one or more of a blade, a bucket, a scraper, and a roller (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claim 3, Schau teaches a utility vehicle of claim 1, wherein the ground sensing apparatus comprises a lidar sensor, a sonic sensor, an ultra-sonic sensor, or a camera (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claim 4, Schau teaches a utility vehicle of claim 1, wherein the electronic processor is further configured to generate as built data for the surface after the work tool has passed over the surface (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claim 5, Schau teaches a utility vehicle of claim 4, wherein the electronic processor is further configured to compare the as built data for the surface to a grade control data for the surface, and generate a corrected data for the surface (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claim 6, Schau teaches a utility vehicle of claim 4, further comprising a display, and wherein the processor is further configured to display one or more of the surface, the grade control data, and the as built data on the display (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claim 7, Schau teaches a grade monitoring system for a work vehicle that operates on a surface (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8), the grade monitoring system comprising: a work tool configured to move a material on the surface where the work tool is configured to move relative to a main frame (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8); a ground sensing apparatus proximate the work tool, wherein the ground sensing apparatus is configured to detect contact between the work tool and the surface (see at least abstract, Para 54, 55 figs 6-8); a non-transitory computer-readable memory storing operation information (see at least abstract, Para 33); and an electronic processor configured to: receive image data captured by the ground sensing apparatus coupled with the work tool as the work tool passes over the surface (see at least abstract, Para 31, 41, 54, 55 figs 6-8), determine if the work tool is in contact with the surface based on the image data, generate, based on the image data, as built data for the surface after the work tool has passed over the surface (see at least abstract, Para 54, 55 figs 6-8). As per claims 8-15, the limitations of claims 8-15 are similar to the limitations of claims 1-7 therefore they are rejected based on the same rationale. Conclusion Please refer to from 892 for cited references. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUSSA A SHAAWAT whose telephone number is (313)446-6592. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erin Piateski can be reached at 571-270-7429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUSSA A SHAAWAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595070
METHOD OF OPERATING A ROTORCRAFT IN A SINGLE ENGINE OPERATION MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595049
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A ROTORCRAFT, ASSOCIATED ROTORCRAFT AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583605
FAST THRUST RESPONSE USING OPTIMAL POWER SPLITTING IN HYBRID ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583606
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT ENERGY OPTIMIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576715
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 876 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month