Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/426,598

FIXING FRAME AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
MORRISON, RASHEN E
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Wistron Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
501 granted / 593 resolved
+16.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
627
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 593 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s remarks on pages 10-12, filed 1/29/2026, with respect to independent claims 1 and 12 have been considered but are moot, because the new ground of rejection incorporates a new interpretation of the claims that rely on the same combination of prior art, and is considered to teach the newly amended language specifically challenged. Examiner has clarified and/or expanded some pertinent parts of the amended claims, such as: the movable element, pushing portions and abutting portion. Note, newly presented amendment to independent claims 1 and 12 are not sufficient in overcoming Sung in its current form. Claims 2, 6-8 and 13, 15-18 depend either indirectly or directly from claims 1 and claim 12, respectively, and are therefore rejected for at least the same reason. Please see revised rejection of these claims below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sung 11,064,624. Regarding claim 1, Sung discloses a fixing frame (Fig 1), comprising: a guiding element (110 and/or including 111, Fig 1), configured for placing an interface card (200, Fig 1) therein along a first direction (see directional arrow in Fig 2); a movable element (133, Fig 3), movably disposed in the guiding element (see Figs 2, 3), wherein the movable element comprises a pushing portion (133a, Fig 3) and an abutted portion (133b, Fig 3); and a handle (150, Fig 1), pivotably disposed on the guiding element (see Figs 4, 5), wherein the handle comprises an abutting portion (131, Fig 4), the abutting portion selectively abuts the abutted portion of the movable element (at pivot portion A, see Figs 3-5; also see col 3 lines 65-66), so that a pivoting movement of the handle (via 151, to closed position, as in Fig 5) forces the pushing portion of the movable element (at 133a, Figs 2, 3; also see col 5 lines 39-46) to push the interface card along a second direction opposite to the first direction (note, as 200 is inserted in arrow direction and makes contact with 133a, 133a exerts an opposing pushing force against 200, Figs 2, 3). Regarding claim 2, Sung discloses the fixing frame according to claim 1, further comprising an elastic element (190, Fig 2), wherein the guiding element has a groove (111, Figs 1, 2) configured for inserting the interface card therein (see Fig 1), and the elastic element is disposed on the movable element for moving the movable element along a third direction perpendicular to the second direction (190 applies force toward 133a vertically which is perpendicular to the second direction, col 4 lines 28-32). Regarding claim 6, Sung discloses the fixing frame according to claim 1, wherein the abutted portion has a first abutted surface (upper part of 113, Fig 4) and a second abutted surface (lower part of 113, Fig 4) that face each other (Fig 4); when the handle pivots (Fig 4), the abutting portion abuts the first abutted surface for moving the movable element away from the guiding element (see Fig 5) or abuts the second abutted surface for moving the movable element towards the guiding element (see Fig 5). Regarding claim 7, Sung discloses the fixing frame according to claim 1, wherein the handle further comprises a restriction portion (155 and/or including 151a, Fig 4) that selectively abuts the guiding element for restricting a pivoting angle of the handle (in the closed position, Fig 5). Regarding claim 8, Sung discloses the fixing frame according to claim 1, further comprising a first engagement portion (upper portion of 113, Fig 4) disposed on the guiding element (Fig 4), wherein the handle further comprises a second engagement portion (151b, Fig 5) connected to the abutting portion (Fig 5), and the second engagement portion is detachably engaged with the first engagement portion (see Fig 4 with respect to Fig 5). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12-13 and 15-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sung. Regarding claim 12, Sung discloses a connector (100, Fig 1 ); a fixing frame (110, Fig 1), located at a side of the connector (side where 110 locates, Fig 1), the fixing frame comprising: a guiding element (111, Fig 1); a movable element (133, Fig 3), movably disposed in the guiding element (see Figs 2, 3), wherein the movable element comprises a pushing portion (133a, Fig 3) and an abutted portion (133b, Fig 3); and a handle (150, Fig 1), pivotably disposed on the guiding element (see Figs 4, 5), wherein the handle comprises an abutting portion (131, Fig 4); and an interface card (200, Fig 1), placed into the guiding element along a first direction (see directional arrow in Fig 2) and connected to the connector (as in Figs 2-5); wherein the abutting portion selectively abuts the abutted portion of the movable element (at pivot portion A, see Figs 3-5; also see col 3 lines 65-66), so that a pivoting movement of the handle (via 151, to closed position, Fig 5) forces the pushing portion of the movable element (at 133a, Figs 2, 3; also see col 5 lines 39-46) to push the interface card along a second direction opposite to the first direction (note, as 200 is inserted in arrow direction making contact with 133a, 133a exerts an opposing pushing force against 200, Figs 2, 3). Sung discloses the claimed invention except for expressly teaching that the device is electronic including motherboard. Dong, however, teaches a similar structure including a device that is electronic (in the form of an electromagnetic shell, col 2 lines 44-45), including motherboard (col 2 line 50). It would been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Sung to be electronic, including motherboard, as taught by Dong, in order to form an electromagnetic shielding component that integrates shielding and active cancellation attributes where the interface card or motherboard and connector originates to give better EMI control than other, more distant components, thereby improving integrity of signal conditioning. Regarding claim 13, Sung in view of Dong disclose the electronic device according to claim 12, Sung teaches wherein the fixing frame further comprises an elastic element (190, Fig 2) that is disposed on the movable element for moving the pushing portion of the movable element into a notch of the interface card (notch below 133, Figs 2, 3) along a third direction perpendicular to the second direction (190 applies force toward 133a vertically which is perpendicular to the second direction, col 4 lines 28-32). Regarding claim 15, Sung in view of Dong disclose the electronic device according to claim 12, Sung teaches wherein the abutted portion has a first abutted surface (upper part of 113, Fig 4) and a second abutted surface (lower part of 113, Fig 4) that face each other (Fig 4); when the handle pivots (Fig 4), the abutting portion abuts the first abutted surface for moving the movable element away from the connector (see Fig 5) or abuts the second abutted surface for moving the movable element towards the connector (see Fig 5). Regarding claim 16, Sung in view of Dong disclose the electronic device according to claim 12, Sung teaches wherein the handle further comprises a restriction portion (155 and/or including 151a, Fig 4) that selectively abuts the guiding element for restricting a pivoting angle of the handle (in the closed position, Fig 5). Regarding claim 17, Sung in view of Dong disclose the electronic device according to claim 12, Sung teaches wherein the fixing frame further comprises a first engagement portion (upper portion of 113, Fig 4) disposed on the guiding element (Fig 4), the handle further comprises a second engagement portion (151b, Fig 5) connected to the abutting portion (Fig 5), and the second engagement portion is detachably engaged with the first engagement portion (see Fig 4 with respect to Fig 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 9-11, 14 and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The dependent claims listed below, in combination with the remaining elements of the independent claim(s) from which they directly/indirectly depend, are not taught, or adequately suggested in the prior art of record. Claim 3. The fixing frame according to claim 2, wherein the movable element further comprises a pressed portion connected to the pushing portion and the abutted portion, the pressed portion has a height greater than a height of the abutted portion, and the handle further comprises a pressing portion; when the pressing portion presses the pressed portion, the pressing portion moves the pushing portion along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction. * Claim 4 depends directly from claim 3 and are therefore allowable for at least the same reason. Claim 5. The fixing frame according to claim 1, wherein the movable element further comprises a pressed portion, the pushing portion and the abutted portion are connected to adjacent sides of the pressed portion, the pushing portion is protruded from the pressed portion, the abutted portion is a recess structure for accommodating the abutting portion of the handle, the pressed portion has a height greater than a height of the abutted portion, the pressed portion has a gap for accommodating a part of the guiding element when the movable element is moved along a third direction perpendicular to the second direction. Claim 9. The fixing frame according to claim 8, further comprising a blocking element and a returning element, wherein the blocking element is movably disposed on the handle, the returning element is disposed between the handle and the blocking element, the guiding element has a groove configured for inserting the interface card therein; when the second engagement portion is engaged with the first engagement portion, the blocking element is located in the groove of the guiding element for blocking the interface card. *Claim 10 depends directly from claim 9 and is therefore allowable for at least the same reason. Claim 11. The fixing frame according to claim 1, further comprising an elastic element, a blocking element and a returning element, wherein the guiding element has a groove configured for inserting the interface card therein, the elastic element is disposed on the movable element for moving the movable element along a third direction perpendicular to the second direction, the blocking element is movably disposed on the handle, the blocking element is selectively located in the groove of the guiding element for blocking the interface card, the returning element is disposed between the handle and the blocking element; the movable element further comprises a pressed portion connected to the pushing portion and the abutted portion, the pressed portion has a height greater than a height of the abutted portion, the pushing portion has a first inclined surface, the blocking element has a second inclined surface, and the handle further comprises a pressed portion for selectively pressing the pressed portion to move the pushing portion along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction. Claim 14. The electronic device according to claim 13, Sung teaches wherein the movable element further comprises a pressed portion connected to the pushing portion and the abutted portion, the pressed portion has a height greater than a height of the abutted portion, and the handle further comprises a pressed portion; when the pressing portion of the handle presses the pressed portion, the pressing portion moves the pushing portion away from the notch of the interface card along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction. Claim 18. The electronic device according to claim 17, wherein the fixing frame further comprises a blocking element and a returning element, the blocking element is movably disposed on the handle, and the returning element is disposed between the handle and the blocking element; when the second engagement portion is engaged with the first engagement portion, the blocking element is located in a notch of the interface card for blocking the interface card. * Claim 19 depends directly from claim 18 and is therefore allowable for at least the same reason. Claim 20. The electronic device according to claim 12, wherein the fixing frame further comprises an elastic element, a blocking element and a returning element, the elastic element is disposed on the movable element for moving the movable element along a third direction perpendicular to the second direction, the blocking element is movably disposed on the handle, the blocking element is selectively located in a notch of the interface card for blocking the interface card, the returning element is disposed between the handle and the blocking element; the movable element further comprises a pressed portion connected to the pushing portion and the abutted portion, the pressed portion has a height greater than a height of the abutted portion, the pushing portion has a first inclined surface, the blocking element has a second inclined surface, and the handle further comprises a pressing portion for selectively pressing the pressed portion to move the pushing portion along a fourth direction opposite to the third direction. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: see PTO 892. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RASHEN E MORRISON whose telephone number is (571)272-8852. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani Hayman can be reached at 571-270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RASHEN E MORRISON/Examiner, Art Unit 2841 /IMANI N HAYMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602089
ADJUSTMENT OF MAGNETIC FORCE IN A COMPUTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601371
HINGE STRUCTURE HAVING COUPLING STRUCTURE OF ARM PART AND ROTATION PART AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602091
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING DUAL DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591277
HINGE DEVICE OF PORTABLE TERMINAL WITH FOLDABLE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585126
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ROTATING SHAFT MECHANISM THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 593 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month