Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/427,007

FAUCET WITH COUPLING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
BARRY, DAPHNE MARIE
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fortune Brands Water Innovations LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
541 granted / 718 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
743
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 718 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, 6, and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 7-15 are allowed. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amended claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant’s arguments are drawn to newly added claim limitations. Election/Restrictions Amendment to the withdrawn/non-elected claims 7-15 filed on 9/28/2025, obviates the necessity for the election requirement mailed on 4/16/2025. Claims 7-15 are rejoined. Status of Claims Amendment to the Claims was filed on 9/28/2025. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements filed on 11/3/2025 is acknowledged by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 4, and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lev US PG PUB 20210148101 (“Lev”). Regarding Claim 1, Lev discloses a wand hose (52) for a wand (20) that can be pulled away from a body (14) of a faucet (10), the wand hose comprising: an outer hose (52, see ann. fig. 12B) having an inlet (end 54, see fig. 13), an outlet (end 56, see fig. 13) , and an inner surface (ann. fig. 12B); and an inner hose (50) extending through the outer hose (52) and having an inlet (end 54, see fig. 13), an outlet (end 56, see fig. 13), an inner surface (ann. fig. 12B), and an outer surface (ann. fig. 12B); wherein downstream ends (56) of the outer hose (52) and inner hose (50) are configured to operatively couple with an upstream portion (coupler 60) of the wand (20); wherein the inner hose (50) is operable to receive a first fluid supply (para 0052, “an adapter 59 is provided at the second ends 56 of the hoses 50, 52 so that the fluid flowing within the concentric hoses 50, 52 are routed to the two outlets 61, 63 provided in the end fitting 60. Such an adapter may also be provided at the first end 54 of the hoses 50, 52 so that the two fluid supplies are routed into the two concentric hoses 50, 52”); wherein the wand hose (52) is operable to receive a second fluid supply (para 0052); wherein the wand hose (52) is configured to extend through a spout (12) of the faucet (10) and wherein the inner hose (50) is continuously pressurized (para 0052) up to the wand (20). PNG media_image1.png 181 270 media_image1.png Greyscale LEV – ANNOTATED FIGURE 12B Regarding Claim 4, Lev discloses a hose coupler (60) disposed at a downstream end of the outer hose (56) and configured to operatively couple the outer hose (52) with the wand (20). Regarding Claim 5, Lev discloses the wand hose is operable to receive the second fluid supply (para 0052, “an adapter 59 is provided at the second ends 56 of the hoses 50, 52 so that the fluid flowing within the concentric hoses 50, 52 are routed to the two outlets 61, 63 provided in the end fitting 60. Such an adapter may also be provided at the first end 54 of the hoses 50, 52 so that the two fluid supplies are routed into the two concentric hoses 50, 52”) via a flow path extending between the outer surface of the inner hose (ann. fig. 12B) and the inner surface of the outer hose (ann. fig. 12B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 16-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lev US PG PUB 20210148101 (“Lev”) in view of Ye US PG PUB 20170101325 (“Ye”). Regarding Claim 16, Lev discloses a wand hose (52) for a wand (20) of a faucet (10), the wand hose (52) comprising: an outer hose (52) having an inlet (54), an outlet (56), and an inner surface (ann. fig. 12B); and an inner hose (50) extending through the outer hose (52) and having an inlet (54), an outlet (56), an inner surface (ann. fig. 12B), and an outer surface (ann. fig. 12B); wherein downstream ends (56) of the outer hose (52) and inner hose (50) are coupled (coupler 60) with the wand (60); wherein the inner hose (50) is operable to receive a water supply through the inner hose (50); wherein the wand hose (52) is operable to receive a water supply; wherein the wand hose (52) is configured to extend through a spout (14) of the faucet (10); and wherein the inner hose (50) is continuously pressurized up to the wand (20). Lev discloses the claimed invention, except inner hose is a treated water supply and the outer hose is a mixed water supply. Ye teaches an inner hose (202) to receive treated water supply (filtered water 210) and outer hose (204) to receive a mixed water supply (220)(see para 0032-0033). PNG media_image2.png 443 369 media_image2.png Greyscale YE – FIGURE 3 It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at a time prior to the effective filing date to have modified the type of water from the two water supplies, as disclosed by Lev, by using a filtered water and an unfiltered mixed water, as taught by Ye, for the purpose of using a single spray head for both filtered and unfiltered water. A user can select the type of water from the input in a spray head. Regarding Claim 17, Ye teaches the treated water supply comprises filtered water (para 0031-0033). Regarding Claim 18, Ye teaches wherein an upstream end of the inner hose (202) is operatively connectable to a filter system (184). Regarding Claim 20, Lev discloses the wand hose (20) is operable to receive the water supply between the outer surface of the inner hose (ann. fig. 12B) and the inner surface of the outer hose (ann. fig. 12B). Lev discloses the claimed invention, except the water supply is a mixed water supply. Ye teaches a mixed water supply. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at a time prior to the effective filing date to have modified the type of water from the two water supplies, as disclosed by Lev, by using a filtered water and an unfiltered mixed water, as taught by Ye, for the purpose of using a single spray head for both filtered and unfiltered water. A user can select the type of water from the input in a spray head. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Daphne Barry whose telephone number is (571)272-9966 and fax number is (571) 273-9966. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday 9 AM-6 PM (eastern). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor either Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at (571) 272-4881 or Craig Schneider can be reached at (571) 272-3607. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center and the Private Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center or Private PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center and Private PAIR to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /DAPHNE M BARRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 11, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 28, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595868
ATTACHMENT DEVICE AND ATTACHMENT METHOD OF INFORMATION ACQUISITION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12571278
Well Control Sealing System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565932
CHOKE VALVE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560044
LOCK SEQUENCING SYSTEM FOR A BLOWOUT PREVENTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552207
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INFLATION OF A VEHICLE TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.3%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 718 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month