Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/427,114

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT KITS, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS THAT FACILITATE BLOCKCHAIN TRANSACTIONS BY GAME ENGINES AND GAME APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Priority
Jan 30, 2023 — provisional 63/442,000 +1 more
Examiner
PANDYA, SUNIT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
VERONA HOLDINGS SEZC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
629 granted / 958 resolved
-4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
984
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§103
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 958 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/21/26 & 8/12/26 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1 & 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koch (US Patent Pub. 20220323866; referred to hereinafter as Koch), in view of Meilich et al. (US Patent 10,946,283; referred to hereinafter as Meilich) and further in view of Rodriguez (US Patent Pub. 20230302364; referred to hereinafter as Rodriguez). Claims 1 & 11: Koch disclose a method comprising, authenticating, by a gaming application having an integrated blockchain software development kit (SDK) being executed on a gaming system, a first user associated with a first user in-game account (0012, registering user), detecting, by the gaming application, a user action involving an in-game item within the game application, wherein the in-game item is associated with a blockchain token stored on a blockchain (0013-0019), a connection function of the integrated blockchain SDK, wherein the connection function connects the first user in-game account to a blockchain application that manages a blockchain account of the first user (0031-0034 & 0073), retrieving, by the gaming application, a public blockchain address for the connected blockchain account of the first user (0022-0025), calling, by the gaming application, a blockchain transaction function of the integrated blockchain SDK, wherein the blockchain transaction function generates a blockchain transaction signature request that requests a digital signature of a blockchain transaction using credentials of the blockchain account of the first user (0019-0025, transactions and verification), wherein the blockchain transaction comprises a plurality of transaction parameters including the public blockchain address of the blockchain account of the first user (0025-0036), transmitting, by the gaming application, the blockchain transaction signature request to the blockchain wallet application, receiving, by the gaming application, an indication from the integrated blockchain SDK that the blockchain transaction has been cryptographically signed by the blockchain wallet application using the credentials of the blockchain account of the first user and the blockchain transaction has been added to the blockchain and in response to the indication, performing, by the gaming application, the user action involving the in-game item within the gaming application (0038-0050). Koch, however, does not explicitly disclose a wallet connection function, wherein the wallet connection function connects the first user in-game account to a blockchain wallet application that manages a blockchain account of the first user. In an analogous art, Meilich teach connection with tokenized game assets where an ERC-721 token represents ownership of a game asset and the game assets are managed via an in-game asset management system (col. 2: 40-58). Meilich, further teach, a wallet connection function of the integrated blockchain SDK, wherein the wallet connection function connects the first user in-game account to a blockchain wallet application that manages a blockchain account of the first user (cols. 8-9: 51-30). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art, at the time of applicant’s invention to modify the system disclosed by Koch to include a wallet connection, wherein the wallet connection function connects the first user in-game account to a blockchain wallet application that manages a blockchain account of the first user, as taught by Meilich to allow players to use wallet connection to easily move token for faster transactions (col. 3: 25-54). Koch, further fails to disclose crafting the in-game item using a set of crafting tokens assigned to the blockchain account, wherein the blockchain transaction is configured to transfer the set of crafting tokens from the blockchain account to a crafting smart contract and invoke a crafting function of the crafting smart contract. In, another analogous art, Rodriguez teach storing a plurality of unique identifiers corresponding to a plurality of game items, each unique identifier corresponding to a unique game item in the plurality of game items, generating a record for each of the plurality of unique identifiers (0027-0030). Rodriguez, further teach crafting tokens assigned to the blockchain account and transfer the set of crafting tokens from the blockchain account to a crafting smart contract and invoke a crafting function of the crafting smart contract (0118-0147). It would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art, at the time of applicant’s invention to modify the system disclosed by Koch to include crafting tokens assigned to the blockchain account and transferring the set from the blockchain account to a crafting smart contract and invoke a crafting function of the crafting smart contract, for safer transactions between blockchain accounts. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7 & 21-36 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUNIT PANDYA whose telephone number is (571)272-2823. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at 571-270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SUNIT PANDYA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749369
SECURE PARTICIPATION WAGERING SYSTEM TO FACILITATE DIGITAL GAMES
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734448
COMPUTER-READABLE NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM HAVING GAME PROGRAM STORED THEREIN, GAME PROCESSING SYSTEM, GAME PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND GAME PROCESSING METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12705950
BARTOP GAMING DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693099
ARCHERY TUNING SYSTEM
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694761
MOBILE POINT OF SALE APPLICATION FOR REDEMPTION OF GAME WINNINGS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+28.2%)
2y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 958 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month