DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Applicant’s response to the Non-final Office Action dated 03/25/2026, filed with the office on 06/24/2026, has been entered and made of record.
Information Disclosure Statement
The information disclosure statement (“IDS”) filed on 04/13/2026 has been reviewed and the listed references have been considered.
Response to Amendment
5. In light of Applicant’s amendment of the claims, the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejections of record for insufficient antecedent basis have been withdrawn.
Status of Claims
Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1, 4, 11, 12 and 15-20 are amended.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed on June 24, 2026, with respect to rejection of claims under 35 U.S.C. 103 has been fully considered; but they are not found persuasive. Specifically, on page 12 of its reply, Applicant argues in first paragraph that the mark in Han is a selection box and its only used to identify a shot object (target object) and does not define the video capture region. Examiner respectfully disagrees. The broadest reasonable interpretation of the claimed recording of a video capture region to generate a video includes recording a close-up small window region to generate a video as disclosed in Han, ¶0005: “the close-up video generated based on a protagonist image stream in a small window”. Therefore, Applicant’s arguments are not found persuasive.
Applicant’s amendment of independent Claims 1, 15 and 20, which has altered the scope of the claims of the instant application, has necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this office action with respect to claims of the instant application. Accordingly, in response to Applicant’s arguments that are merely directed to the amended portion of the claims, new analyses have been presented below, which make Applicant’s arguments moot.
Consequently, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention.
Claims 1-5 and 7-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (US 2024/0406536 A1) in view of Ikeda (US 2025/0203194 A1).
Regarding claim 1, Han teaches, A shooting method, comprising: (Han, ¶0004: “a shooting method, applied to an electronic device having a camera”) acquiring a plurality of first image frames in response to a first operation, (Han, ¶0004: “in response to the first operation… a first image is displayed”) the plurality of first image frames comprising a first object; (Han, ¶0004: “one or more shot objects in the first image”) displaying the plurality of first image frames and a first marker, (Han, ¶0004: “one or more marks are displayed on the first image, the one or more marks correspond to one or more shot objects”) wherein the first marker is located in a region where the first object is located, (Han, ¶0033: “displaying the one or more marks on the one or more objects in the first image”) (Han, ¶0005: “the original video generated based on an image stream in the preview window”).
However, Han does not explicitly teach, the first marker indicates that the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames is being used as a video capture region to generate a video, and an image range in the plurality of first image frames defined by the first marker is a recording content in video frames of the generated video.
In an analogous field of endeavor, Ikeda teaches, the first marker indicates that the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames is being used as a video capture region to generate a video, (Ikeda, ¶0002: “clipping only a partial region from an image captured by a camera is generated and processing of distributing or recording the clipped image is performed”) and an image range in the plurality of first image frames defined by the first marker is a recording content in video frames of the generated video. (Ikeda, ¶00383: “calculating (position and size) a clipping region including the clipping target determined by the clipping target determination unit 203, for example, a clipping rectangular”; the marker (According to Applicant’s drawings - Fig. 10-4) is interpreted as a clipping rectangular region).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Han using the teachings of Ikeda to introduce a rectangular clipping target region. A person skilled in the art would be motivated to combine the known elements as described above and achieve the predictable result of recording a partial region with a rectangular range within an image. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the analogous arts Han and Ikeda to obtain the invention in claim 1.
Regarding claim 2, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to a second operation, moving the first marker from the region where the first object is located to a region where a second object is located in the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0090: “display a selection box on each object, for example, a selection box 121 corresponding to the person 1, a selection box 122 corresponding to the person 2, and a selection box 123 corresponding to the person 3. In this case, the user may determine a video protagonist by using the selection boxes”).
Regarding claim 3, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, further comprising: displaying a plurality of second image frames, the plurality of second image frames showing images of the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0216: “display a close-up image of the protagonist in the small window, thereby implementing a function of displaying the close-up video in the small window”).
Regarding claim 4, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 3, further comprising: while moving the first marker from the region where the first object is located to a region where a second object is located in the plurality of first image frames, (Han, ¶0132: “after the protagonist is switched to the person 2, the terminal 100 may determine a group of smoothly moving image frames”) changing the images shown in the plurality of second image frames as the region where the first marker is located changes. (Han, ¶0132: “display the image frames in the small window 141, to implement non-jumping protagonist switching display”).
Regarding claim 5, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, comprising: in response to a third operation, adjusting a size of the first marker. (Han, ¶0134: “transpose control may be used to adjust a size of the window”).
Regarding claim 7, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, wherein, before displaying the plurality of first image frames and the first marker, the shooting method further comprises: displaying the plurality of first image frames and recognizing a preset object in the plurality of first image frames; (Han, ¶0033: “displaying one or more marks on the first image specifically includes: performing object identification on the first image collected by the camera”) and displaying a second marker, the second marker indicating a region where the preset object is located in the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0207: “After CropRagion Width and CropRagionHeight are determined, with reference to a known middle point (P3) of the protagonist person, the terminal 100 may crop the raw image to obtain the protagonist-centered close-up image”).
Regarding claim 8, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 7, further comprising: changing the second marker indicating the region where the preset object with a highest priority is located in the plurality of first image frames to the first marker; (Han, ¶0131: “the terminal 100 may set the person 2 corresponding to the selection box 122 as a protagonist. Referring to a user interface 25 shown in FIG. 2E, after the person 2 is set as the protagonist, the terminal 100 may display a close-up image of the person 2 in the small window”) wherein the first marker is different from the second marker. (Han, ¶0099: “display an icon of another style, to indicate that the person 3 is selected as the protagonist. For distinguishing, for example, the selection box 123 in FIG. 1C changes to red or blue”).
Regarding claim 9, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 7, further comprising: in response to determining that the preset object is not recognized in the plurality of first image frames, (Han, ¶0262: “When protagonist focusing fails, the preview window 113 may continue to display the raw image”) displaying the first marker in a preset position of the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0207: “terminal 100 may crop the raw image to obtain the protagonist-centered close-up image”).
Regarding claim 10, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 7, wherein, before displaying the plurality of first image frames and the first marker, the shooting method further comprises: in response to a sixth operation, canceling display of the second marker; (Han, ¶0142: “the user cancels the selected protagonist person 3 by using an operation of tapping the check box 142, to re-select a new protagonist from the identified objects”) and displaying the first marker based on a region of the plurality of first image frames where the sixth operation acts on. (Han, ¶0136: “the terminal 100 may display the small window 141 in the preview window 113 again based on a re-determined protagonist”).
Regarding claim 11, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, further comprising: in response to a seventh operation, canceling display of the first marker; (Han, ¶0142: “the terminal 100 may close the small window after canceling the previously selected protagonist”) and displaying a second marker, the second marker indicating the region where the preset object is located in the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0137: “operation of selecting a protagonist by the user is detected again, the terminal 100 may re-generate a small window, display a close-up image of the protagonist, and record a new close-up video”).
Regarding claim 12, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, further comprising: acquiring a plurality of third image frames, the plurality of third image frames being sequentially connected with the plurality of first image frames, the plurality of third image frames comprising a plurality of first frames acquired over a first time duration, (Han, ¶0181: “the terminal 100 may position the protagonist in an image sequence collected by the camera, to implement protagonist tracking and generate a close-up video of the protagonist”) the plurality of first frames comprising a second object and not comprising the first object; (Han, ¶0174: “In a single-person scenario (there is only one person object in an image frame”) and moving the first marker from the region where the first object is located in the plurality of first image frames to a region where the second object is located in the plurality of first frames. (Han, ¶0196: “If the protagonist is the person 3, the close-up image of the person 3 expected to be displayed in the small window should be an image surrounded by a dashed-line box 62”).
Regarding claim 13, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method according to claim 12, wherein, the plurality of third image frames further comprise a plurality of second frames acquired over a second time duration, the plurality of second frames are sequentially connected with the plurality of first frames, (Han, ¶0100: “In response to the operations of starting shooting and ending shooting, the terminal 100 may save, as a video, an image frame sequence collected by the camera during the operation”) the plurality of second frames comprise the first object and the second object; the shooting method, further comprises: (Han, ¶0174: “in a multi-person scenario in which persons do not overlap, the object included in the ith frame of image can be better identified according to the foregoing method”) in response to determining that the first time duration is less than or equal to a preset time duration, moving the first marker from the region where the second object is located to the region where the first object is located in the plurality of second frames. (Han, ¶0008: “in response to the second operation, recording the close-up video based on the image displayed in the first window, where duration of the close-up video is less than that of the original video”).
Regarding claim 14, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, further comprising: making a ratio of a range of the first marker to an area of the plurality of first image frames greater than or equal to 1/2. (Han, ¶0210: “the terminal 100 may zoom in a close-up image with 540p and 960p in equal proportions to obtain a close-up image with 1080p and 1920p”).
Regarding claim 15, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, An electronic device, comprising: a camera; (Han, ¶0004: “an electronic device having a camera”) one or more processors; and a memory, (Han, ¶0041: “one or more processors and one or more memories”) configured to store processor-executable instructions; wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the electronic device to: (Han, ¶0041: “one or more processors execute the computer instructions, the electronic device is enabled to perform the method”) cause the camera to acquire a plurality of first image frames (Han, ¶0308: “The camera 193 is configured to capture a still image or a video”) in response to a first operation, (Han, ¶0004: “in response to the first operation”) the plurality of first image frames comprising a first object; (Han, ¶0004: “one or more shot objects in the first image”) display the plurality of first image frames and a first marker, (Han, ¶0004: “one or more marks are displayed on the first image, the one or more marks correspond to one or more shot objects”) wherein the first marker is located in a region where the first object is located, (Han, ¶0033: “displaying the one or more marks on the one or more objects in the first image”) and (Han, ¶0005: “the original video generated based on an image stream in the preview window”). However, Han does not explicitly teach, the first marker indicates that the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames is being used as a video capture region to generate a video, and an image range in the plurality of first image frames defined by the first marker is a recording content in video frames of the generated video.
In an analogous field of endeavor, Ikeda teaches, the first marker indicates that the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames is being used as a video capture region to generate a video, (Ikeda, ¶0002: “clipping only a partial region from an image captured by a camera is generated and processing of distributing or recording the clipped image is performed”) and an image range in the plurality of first image frames defined by the first marker is a recording content in video frames of the generated video. (Ikeda, ¶00383: “calculating (position and size) a clipping region including the clipping target determined by the clipping target determination unit 203, for example, a clipping rectangular”).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Han using the teachings of Ikeda to introduce a rectangular clipping target region. A person skilled in the art would be motivated to combine the known elements as described above and achieve the predictable result of recording a partial region with a rectangular range within an image. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the analogous arts Han and Ikeda to obtain the invention in claim 15.
Regarding claim 16, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The electronic device according to claim 15, wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the electronic device to: display a plurality of second image frames, the plurality of second image frames showing images of the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0216: “display a close-up image of the protagonist in the small window, thereby implementing a function of displaying the close-up video in the small window”).
Regarding claim 17, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The electronic device according to claim 16, wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the electronic device to: while moving the first marker from the region where the first object is located to a region where a second object is located in the plurality of first image frames, (Han, ¶0132: “after the protagonist is switched to the person 2, the terminal 100 may determine a group of smoothly moving image frames”) change the images shown in the plurality of second image frames as the region where the first marker is located changes. (Han, ¶0132: “display the image frames in the small window 141, to implement non-jumping protagonist switching display”).
Regarding claim 18, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The electronic device according to claim 15, wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the electronic device to: cause the camera to acquire a plurality of third image frames, the plurality of third image frames be sequentially connected with the plurality of first image frames, the plurality of third image frames comprise a plurality of first frames acquired over a first time duration, (Han, ¶0181: “the terminal 100 may position the protagonist in an image sequence collected by the camera, to implement protagonist tracking and generate a close-up video of the protagonist”) the plurality of first frames comprise a second object and not comprise the first object; (Han, ¶0174: “In a single-person scenario (there is only one person object in an image frame”) and move the first marker from the region where the first object is located in the plurality of first image frames to a region where the second object is located in the plurality of first frames. (Han, ¶0196: “If the protagonist is the person 3, the close-up image of the person 3 expected to be displayed in the small window should be an image surrounded by a dashed-line box 62”).
Regarding claim 19, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The electronic device according to claim 18, wherein, the plurality of third image frames further comprise a plurality of second frames acquired over a second time duration, the plurality of second frames are sequentially connected with the plurality of first frames, (Han, ¶0100: “In response to the operations of starting shooting and ending shooting, the terminal 100 may save, as a video, an image frame sequence collected by the camera during the operation”) the plurality of second frames comprise the first object and the second object; wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the electronic device to: (Han, ¶0174: “in a multi-person scenario in which persons do not overlap, the object included in the ith frame of image can be better identified according to the foregoing method”) in response to determining that the first time duration is less than or equal to a preset time duration, move the first marker from the region where the second object is located to the region where the first object is located in the plurality of second frames. (Han, ¶0008: “in response to the second operation, recording the close-up video based on the image displayed in the first window, where duration of the close-up video is less than that of the original video”).
Regarding claim 20, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, storing executable instructions, (Han, ¶0042: “a computer-readable storage medium, including instructions”) wherein the executable instructions, when executed by one or more processors, of an electronic device, cause the electronic device to: processor, implement: (Han, ¶0042: “When the instructions are run on an electronic device, the electronic device is enabled to perform the method”) acquire a plurality of first image frames in response to a first operation, (Han, ¶0004: “in response to the first operation… a first image is displayed”) the plurality of first image frames comprising a first object; (Han, ¶0004: “one or more shot objects in the first image”) display the plurality of first image frames and a first marker, (Han, ¶0004: “one or more marks are displayed on the first image, the one or more marks correspond to one or more shot objects”) and generate a video from images of the video capture region in the plurality of first image frames. (Han, ¶0005: “the original video generated based on an image stream in the preview window”). However, Han does not explicitly teach, and the first marker indicates that the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames is being used as a video capture region to generate a video, and an image range in the plurality of first image frames defined by the first marker is a recording content in video frames of the generated video.
In an analogous field of endeavor, Ikeda teaches, and the first marker indicates that the region where the first marker is located in the plurality of first image frames is being used as a video capture region to generate a video, (Ikeda, ¶0002: “clipping only a partial region from an image captured by a camera is generated and processing of distributing or recording the clipped image is performed”) and an image range in the plurality of first image frames defined by the first marker is a recording content in video frames of the generated video. (Ikeda, ¶00383: “calculating (position and size) a clipping region including the clipping target determined by the clipping target determination unit 203, for example, a clipping rectangular”).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Han using the teachings of Ikeda to introduce a rectangular clipping target region. A person skilled in the art would be motivated to combine the known elements as described above and achieve the predictable result of recording a partial region with a rectangular range within an image. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the analogous arts Han and Ikeda to obtain the invention in claim 20.
Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al. (US 2024/0406536 A1) in view of Ikeda (US 2025/0203194 A1) and in further view of Feng et al. (US 2023/0021016 A1).
Regarding claim 6, Han in view of Ikeda teaches, The shooting method of claim 1, further comprising. However, the combination of Han and Ikeda does not explicitly teach blurring other regions in the plurality of first image frames except the region where the first marker is located.
In an analogous field of endeavor, Feng teaches blurring other regions in the plurality of first image frames except the region where the first marker is located. (Feng, ¶0037: “Based on the location of the ROI in the image frame… blurring a region of the image frame outside of the ROI”).
Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Han in view of Ikeda using the teachings of Feng to introduce blurring. A person skilled in the art would be motivated to combine the known elements as described above and achieve the predictable result of focusing on the desired object while shooting a video. Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the analogous arts Han, Ikeda and Feng to obtain the invention in claim 6.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEHRAZUL ISLAM whose telephone number is (571)270-0489. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 8am-5pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saini Amandeep can be reached at (571) 272-3382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/MEHRAZUL ISLAM/Examiner, Art Unit 2662
/AMANDEEP SAINI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2662
Prosecution Insights