Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/427,600

VEHICLE WITH EXOSKELETON

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
WEISBERG, AMY REGINA
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tesla Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
303 granted / 584 resolved
At TC average
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 584 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Based on the IDS filed on 1/29/26 the Notice of Allowance has been withdrawn. See NPL on 1/29/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 5, 8-11, 14-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang US 2019/093992 (see 1/29/26 NPL). Regarding claims 1 and 23, Document D4/Zhang discloses: a vehicle (figure 1), comprising: a vehicle frame (10) comprising an exterior portion/exoskeleton; an exterior [door] panel (20, 30, 40, 50) formed from a monolithic metal [0041] sheet and mounted to the exterior portion of the vehicle frame directly through a hinge/joint (see figure 1); and at least one component (handle in figures 1, 11, 18 additional panels (32/33) directly attached to the exterior panel (20, 30), wherein the exterior [door] panel (20, 30, 40, 50) bears the load of the at least one component, wherein the exterior [door] panel (20, 30, 40, 50) does not comprise an additional support structure added to the exterior [door] panel, and wherein the additional support structure is selected from the group consisting of an additional metal panel, a support beam, a stamped reinforcement, an anti-intrusion bar, and combinations thereof. [0002] discloses the vehicle is an armored vehicle thus “impact protection”. See figure 1 for continuous uninterrupted exterior. Zhang fails to explicitly teach A and B or B and C pillars or B pillar (claim 23) however the use of pillars in vehicle construction is well known in the art and used to mount doors. Regarding claims 3 and 24, the door panel of D4 comprise steel [0041]. Regarding claims 5 and 25, the panels of D4 provide side impact protection. Regarding claims 8 and 26, obvious design choice/known in the art to omit paint – see NF of 8/22/25 as evidence of this. Regarding claim 9, electric motor or electric vehicles are well known in the art. Regarding claims 10-11 the panels are passenger compartment/door panels. Regarding claim 14, the joint is a hinge. Regarding claims 15-22 which are various method claims – The structural limitations of the methods are listed above. Laser cutting, rolling and shaping, not heat treating of a steel door panel, claims 16-18 are common knowledge in this art to fit panel to the door and to eliminate a manufacturing step respectively. As stated no above no anti-intrusion bar is attached to the panel. D4 teaches a plurality of windows (not described but shown see figure 9) – electric window assemblies are well known in the art – such as a defrosters. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 20160272249 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMY REGINA WEISBERG whose telephone number is (571)270-5500. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:15-4:15. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 14, 2025
Response Filed
May 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 14, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 16, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600210
NON-MOTORIZED RETRACTABLE ROOF COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600227
FLAP ACTUATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600205
UPPER DOOR ATTACHMENT FOR A UTILITY TERRAIN VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594820
VEHICLE BODY ROOF STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589809
Swing Door Mounting Structure for Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 584 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month