Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/427,785

METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner
RIVAS, RAUL
Art Unit
2471
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apogee Networks, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
391 granted / 471 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
515
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.1%
+24.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 471 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the application filed on 01/30/2024. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang et al. (U.S. Pub. 20240008034). Regarding claim 1 Huang disclose, a first node for wireless communications, comprising: a first receiver para. 32, “At receiver system 250”, receiving at least one signaling para. 32, “Each receiver 254 may condition (e.g., filters, amplifies, and downconverts) a respective received signal”; and a first transmitter para. 32, “a transmitter system 210”, transmitting a first UCI on a target PUSCH para. 100, “the UE multiplexes the UCI in the earliest PUSCH that the UE transmits in the slot”, the target PUSCH being one of multiple PUSCHs para. 98, “The UE determines the PUSCH for UCI multiplexing by applying the following procedure on the candidate PUSCHs as described in this clause:”; each PUSCH among the multiple PUSCHs being scheduled by one of the at least one signaling para. 153, “DCI format 0_1 is used for the scheduling of one or multiple PUSCH in one cell”; the first UCI comprising HARQ-ACK information para. 6, “The UE selects the first PUSCH to comprise the first UCI based on whether the UE is configured with joint Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) feedback mode or separate HARQ feedback mode. The UE transmits the first PUSCH and the second PUSCH on the first cell, wherein the first PUSCH transmitted on the first cell comprises the first UCI”; wherein the target PUSCH depends on reference information corresponding to the multiple PUSCHs para. 189, “the UE may have these two candidate PUSCHs for transmitting multiplexed Uplink Control Information (UCI), and thus, a network node may need to blindly decode these two PUSCHs if there is no further design of UCI multiplexing. In some examples, the two TRPs may be in one serving cell”, and the reference information comprises at least one of a coresetPoolIndex, an MCS index, or a frequency-domain resource allocation para. 189, “In some examples, the two TRPs are associated with different CORESETPoolIndex (e.g., one of the two TRPs is associated with one CORESETPoolIndex and the other one of the two TRPs may be associated with another CORESETPoolIndex)”; there exists at least one PUSCH corresponding to a coresetPoolIndex with a value of 0 para. 198, “In some examples, UCI0 corresponds to a first plurality of UCI(s) associated with a first index (e.g., CORESETPoolindex=0, or a first TRP group index)” and there exists at least one PUSCH corresponding to a coresetPoolIndex with a value of 1 among the multiple PUSCHs para. 189, “In some examples, UCI1 corresponds to a second plurality of UCI(s) associated with a second index (e.g., CORESETPoolindex=1, or a second TRP group index).”, the target PUSCH is a PUSCH corresponding to a coresetPoolIndex with a value of k among the multiple PUSCHs, and k is a value of a coresetPoolIndex corresponding to a first PUCCH, k is one of 0 or 1 para. 476, “the UE selects the first PUSCH for multiplexing the first UCI based on the UE being configured with the separate HARQ feedback mode and (i) a first PUCCH and the first PUSCH being associated with a same Transmission Configuration Indicator (TCI) state, wherein the first PUCCH is associated with the first UCI, and/or (ii) the first PUCCH and the first PUSCH being associated with a same Control Resource Set (CORESET) pool index”; the first PUCCH is overlapping with the multiple PUSCHs, and the first PUCCH is a PUCCH carrying the first UCI para. 101, “UE would transmit multiple overlapping PUCCHs in a slot or overlapping PUCCH(s) and PUSCH(s) in a slot and, when applicable as described in clauses 9.2.5.1 and 9.2.5.2, the UE is configured to multiplex different UCI types in one PUCCH”. Regarding claim 2 Huang disclose, wherein only when none of the multiple PUSCHs are used to multiplex an aperiodic CSI, the target PUSCH depends on reference information corresponding to the multiple PUSCHs para. 100, “If the UE would multiplex UCI in one of the candidate PUSCHs and the UE does not multiplex aperiodic CSI in any of the candidate PUSCHs, the UE multiplexes the UCI in a PUSCH of the serving cell with the smallest ServCellIndex subject to the conditions in clause 9.2.5 for UCI multiplexing being fulfilled”. Regarding claim 3 Huang disclose, wherein all PUSCHs overlapping with a PUCCH carrying a UCI are selected as candidate PUSCHs, and any of the multiple PUSCHs is the candidate PUSCH para. 53-54, “if the UE is provided UCI-MuxWithDifferentPriority and the timeline conditions in clause 9.2.5 for multiplexing UCI in a PUCCH or a PUSCH are satisfied [0054] first, the UE resolves overlapping for PUCCH and/or PUSCH transmissions of a same priority index as described in clauses 9.2.5”. Regarding claim 4 Huang disclose, wherein each signaling in the at least one signaling is a DCI format para. 107, 156, “the PUCCH resource is indicated by a DCI format… DCI format 0_1 is used for the scheduling of one or multiple PUSCH in one cell, or indicating CG downlink feedback information (CG-DFI) to a UE”. Regarding claim 5 Huang disclose, wherein for any of the multiple PUSCHs, the corresponding reference information is a coresetPoolIndex para. 227, “for one or more PUSCH(s) or PUCCH(s) without (TRP) index or index associated with TRP or CORESETPoolIndex, the one or more PUSCH(s) or PUCCH(s) corresponds to TRP with a first CORESETPoolIndex (e.g., CORESETPoolIndex=0)”. Claim 6 recites an apparatus corresponding to the apparatus of claim 1 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 1. Regarding claims 7-10, 12-15 and 17-20 the limitations of claims 7-10, 12-15 and 17-20, respectively, are rejected in the same manner as analyzed above with respect to claims 2-5, respectively. Claim 11 recites a method corresponding to the apparatus of claim 1 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 1. Claim 16 recites a method corresponding to the apparatus of claim 6 and thus is rejected under the same reason set forth in the rejection of claim 6. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Zeng et al. (U.S. Pub. 20220256586) which disclose(s) HARQ-ACK codebook generation method, information transmitting method, and device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAUL RIVAS whose telephone number is (571)270–5590. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday, from 8:30am to 5:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy K. Kundu, can be reached on (571) 272 - 8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571–272–8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800–786–9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571–272–1000. /R.R/ Examiner, Art Unit 2471 /SUJOY K KUNDU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604324
BASE STATION, TERMINAL AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12580619
CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION ACQUISITION FOR LINE-OF-SIGHT MIMO FEEDER LINKS IN MULTIBEAM SATELLITE SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574952
MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12543172
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACCESS NETWORK CONTROL CHANNELS BASED ON NETWORK SLICE REQUIREMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12538160
REPORTING DELAY FOR CELL ACTIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 471 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month