Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/428,257

LOCAL OR REMOTE CONSOLE OR PC-BASED GAMEPLAY WITH LOCAL AND REMOTE FRIENDS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Examiner
DOSHI, ANKIT B
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Adeia Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
375 granted / 563 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
599
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/12/2026 has been entered. Applicant’s submission of a response on 6/12/2026 has been received and considered. In the response, Applicant amended claims 2, 4, 5, 52, 54 and 55. Therefore, claims 2 – 6 and 52 - 56 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5 – 6 and 55 – 56 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 5 recites the limitation "a source internet protocol (SRC IP) address" in line 3, “SRC IP address” in line 13 and 15. It is not clear if these are the same element or distinct elements. For clarity, when multiple terms have the same name but are intended to be distinct elements, clearly distinct labels, such as "first element" and "second element" should be used to make the distinct nature clear. Conversely, if the terms are to the same element, a consistent name should be used with “said” or “the” when referring back. Claim 55 recites the limitation "a source internet protocol (SRC IP) address" in line 4, “SRC IP address” in line 14 and 16. It is not clear if these are the same element or distinct elements. For clarity, when multiple terms have the same name but are intended to be distinct elements, clearly distinct labels, such as "first element" and "second element" should be used to make the distinct nature clear. Conversely, if the terms are to the same element, a consistent name should be used with “said” or “the” when referring back. All dependent claims inherit the deficiencies of the claim(s) from which they depend and are similarly rejected for the same reason. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANKIT B DOSHI whose telephone number is (571)270-7863. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri. ~9 - ~5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at 571-272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANKIT B DOSHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701287
REAL-TIME INTERACTIVE PLATFORM FOR LIVE STREAMS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12661592
LIKE BUTTON
6y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636578
SIMULATED SPACE LOCAL PARTITION REASSIGNMENT AND APPLICATION AUTOSCALING
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12611586
System and Method for Generating Daily-Updated Rating of Individual Player Performance in Sports
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605625
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF A GAMING APPLICATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+22.3%)
3y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month