Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/428,572

ARMREST MOUNTING UNITS, HANDCARTS AND SEAT COMPONENTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 31, 2024
Examiner
SWENSON, BRIAN L
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
752 granted / 930 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
954
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 930 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, Figures 1-15, Claims 1-4 and 7-13 in the reply filed on February, 11, 2026 is acknowledged. An action on the merits of Claims 1-4 and 7-13 follows below. (Claims 5, 6 and 14-29 withdrawn.) Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the abstract begins with “The present disclosure disclose” which is implied. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by EP 3 293 043 issued to BOS GMBH (Foreign Citation No. 1 in the IDS filed on 10/15/2024). Regarding Claim 1, BOS GMBH teaches an armrest mounting unit, comprising: a fixed base (4); a connecting base (37; Figures 19-20); a first magnetic member (43) fixed on one of the fixed base (4) and the connecting base; and a locking mechanism (38, 40) disposed on the other one of the fixed base and the connecting base (37), wherein when the locking mechanism (38, 40) is in a locked state, the connecting base (37) is fixable (see Figures 17-18) on the fixed base (4) through the locking mechanism (38, 40), and when the locking mechanism (38,40) is in an unlocked state, the connecting base (37) is separable from the fixed base (4), and wherein the first magnetic member (43) forms a magnetic action with the locking mechanism (38, 40), to assist positioning and separation of the fixed base and the connecting base (The magnetic force of the magnetic lock 43 pulls the plug wedge 38 into the plug-receiving area 42 axially and secures the plug wedge 38 in the insertion direction by the corresponding magnetic force. The magnetic force can act on the plug wedge 38, since the metal pins 40 are attracted to the front side of the plug wedge 38 of the permanent magnet). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2-4 and 7-13 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the primary reason for the indication of allowable subject matter in this case is the inclusion of: in re claim 2, where an unlocking member moves between a first locked position and a first unlocked position and an engaging member is disposed on the connecting base and a second magnetic member movably disposed on the connecting base and forming a magnetic action with the first magnetic member; in re claim 12 where the fixed base includes a first coupling portion and the connecting base includes a second coupling portion; and when the connecting base is engaged with and locked with the fixed base, the second coupling portion is sleeved outside the first coupling portion; in re claim 13 where a handcart is provided with a frame, an armrest body, and the armrest mounting unit, where the fixed base is disposed on one of the frame and armrest body and the connecting base is disposed on the other one of the frame and armrest body, and the armrest body is detachably mounted on the frame through the armrest mounting unit, in combination with the other elements recited, not found in the prior art of record. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN L SWENSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5572. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRIAN SWENSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 3618 /BRIAN L SWENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600217
HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE SUBFRAME WITH BATTERY STORAGE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600416
RETRACTABLE FENDER FLARE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600247
BATTERY ATTACHING/DETACHING STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600246
ADJUSTABLE THERMAL MID-BEAM MEMBER FOR SEPARATING BATTERY CELL ROWS IN A BATTERY ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583304
VEHICLE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+9.5%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 930 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month