Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/429,520

PLACEMENT APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 01, 2024
Priority
Feb 02, 2023 — JP 2023-014570
Examiner
KEENAN, JAMES W
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Isuzu Motors Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
760 granted / 1138 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1167
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
73.3%
+33.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1138 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 2, the recitation “a battery … is placed” is not understood in the context of an apparatus claim, as it appears to require the performance of an action, as would typically be associated with a method claim. However, an apparatus is defined by what it is, not by what it does. Appropriate functional terminology, such as configured to, capable of, etc., should be used. This also applies to the recitations “is placed”, “is being moved” and “makes contact” is lines 2-5 of claim 5. Claim 2, line 3, it is not clear if the recitation “a downstream side” is intended to be the same as “a downstream end” recited in claim 1. It will be assumed as such. Further in claim 5, line 7, it is unclear what is meant by the recitation “inclined to be lowered on a center side”. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or (a)(2) as being anticipated by Li et al (US 2025/0326324 or corresponding CN 217468978). Note: the Chinese patent document was published on 9/20/22 and thus qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). Further, the US document claims priority to the Chinese application filed on 5/30/22 which became the above-noted patent document, and thus qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). Any passages noted in the following analysis will refer to the US document. Li shows a placement apparatus, comprising: a placement portion 2 on which a battery (note: element 1 is a battery swap frame in which a plurality of batteries are held; this is not precluded by the claim language) to be attached to a vehicle is placed; a positioning portion 9 disposed on or in the placement portion, the positioning portion being configured to position the battery by being engaged with a positioned portion 8 formed in or on a bottom portion of the battery; and a guidance portion 4 including a guidance surface 41 for guiding the battery toward the positioning portion, the guidance portion being disposed to protrude from the placement portion, wherein the guidance portion is disposed such that the positioning portion is located at a position corresponding to the positioned portion of the battery when a contact portion 3 of the battery making contact with the guidance surface is located at a downstream end of the guidance surface in a guiding direction (see Figs. 1-4 and “Example 10”, pars. [0090] – [0092]). Re claim 2, the guidance surface is inclined so as to be located more on the placement portion side toward a downstream side in the guiding direction. Re claim 3, the positioning portion is disposed on or in the placement portion such that the positioning portion is engageable with the positioned portion when the contact portion is located at the downstream end. Re claim 4, the contact portion of the battery making contact with the guidance surface is “a projection portion” (as broadly recited; see Figs. 2-3) disposed on the bottom portion of the battery, and a height of the guidance portion is smaller than a height of the projection portion (emphasis added, noting that neither “a height” of the guidance portion nor of the projection portion is defined in any way that precludes such an interpretation). Re claim 5 (as best understood in light of the rejections under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) above), Li further discloses a placement apparatus, comprising: a placement portion 2 on which a battery 1 attachable to and detachable from a vehicle is placed; and a guidance portion 4 including a guidance surface 41 that, while the battery is being moved in a first direction toward a target position on the placement portion, makes contact with the battery to guide the battery in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction, wherein the guidance surface is inclined to be lowered on a center side in the target position, and an end portion of the guidance surface on the center side in the target position is located at a position corresponding to an end portion of the target position in the second direction, as described in at least the above-noted par. [0092]. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to James Keenan whose telephone number is (571)272-6925. The examiner can normally be reached Mon. - Thurs. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ernesto Suarez can be reached at 571-270-5565. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /James Keenan/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3652 3/05/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12623842
HANDLING GARMENTS IN AN AUTOMATED WAREHOUSE
3y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617608
PACK THROUGH EJECT PANEL
2y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612249
MECHANICAL ARM
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606075
PACKAGE STORAGE AND DELIVERY UNIT
1y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12601197
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MANAGING THE STORAGE, PARKING, OR DELIVERY OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1138 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month