Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 20, 2026
Application No. 18/429,895

DEVELOPING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 01, 2024
Priority
Jul 28, 2023 — JP 2023-122977
Examiner
BRASE, SANDRA L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
961 granted / 1044 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1052
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1044 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 14-16, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harada (US 2022/0197186). Harada (…186) discloses a developing device (40) comprising: a housing (50) that stores a developer ([0028]-[0029]; and figures 2 and 3); a developer holding unit (44) that is disposed at an opening portion of the housing that faces an image holding body and that rotates while holding the developer ([0028] and figure 2); an exhaust passage through which air in the housing is discharged to outside ([0042] and [0046]); and a suction passage through which the developer that leaks out from the opening portion of the housing is sucked ([0042]-[0045]), wherein the exhaust passage and the suction passage are disposed at different positions along an axial direction of the developer holding unit (figures 4 and 5) [see Applicant’s claim 1]. The suction passage is disposed downstream of the opening portion of the housing along a rotational direction of the developer holding unit ([0039]-[0040]; and figures 2 and 4) [see Applicant’s claim 2]. The exhaust passage is disposed at an upper portion of the housing along a vertical direction (figure 4) [see Applicant’s claim 3]. The suction passage is disposed at at least both end portions of the developer holding unit along the axial direction (figures 4 and 5) [see Applicant’s claim 5]. An additional suction passage is disposed between the suction passages disposed at the both end portions of the developer holding unit along the axial direction ([0045]; and figures 4 and 5) [see Applicant’s claim 6]. The exhaust passage is disposed at positions of the developer holding unit other than positions of the suction passages along the axial direction (figure 5) [see Applicant’s claim 8]. An image forming apparatus comprising: an image holding unit (21) that holds an electrostatic latent image; and a developing unit (40) that develops the electrostatic latent image on the image holding unit, wherein the developing device is used as the developing unit ([0017]-[0018]; and figures 1 and 2) [see Applicant’s claims 14-16, 18 and 19]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Harada (US 2022/0197186) in view of Ohashi et al. (US 2017/0277079). Harada (…186) discloses the features mentioned previously, but does not disclose the claimed capture unit. Ohashi et al. (…079) discloses an exhaust passage that includes a capture unit (57) provided at an exit portion of the exhaust passage to capture developer that leaks out through the exhaust passage ([0055]; and figure 6) [see Applicant’s claim 9]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have the claimed capture unit, since as disclosed by Ohashi et al. (…079), such a capture unit prevents the leakage of developer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 7, 10-13, 17 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANDRA BRASE whose telephone number is (571)272-2131. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached at 571-272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANDRA BRASE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852 August 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730405
PRINTING EQUIPMENT FOR METALLIC MATERIAL AND PRINTING METHOD USING SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730396
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724359
CHARGING DEVICE, TONER-IMAGE FORMING UNIT, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724362
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724364
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CLEANING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (-2.5%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1044 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month