Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/429,980

FRONT FRAME STRUCTURE FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 01, 2024
Examiner
MCFALL, NICHOLAS A
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Subaru Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 524 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
541
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 524 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 contains the phrase “frame-shaped rigid member” which renders the claim indefinite because it is not possible to ascertain the exact shape of the rigid member as “frames” can come in many different shapes. Claims 2, 4 and 5 are rejected as being dependent on claim 1 and therefore containing the same defect. Claims 4 and 5 recite in the preamble the subcombination of a “front frame structure” that is inconsistent with the body of the claims that recite limitations directed to the combination of the front frame structure and a vehicle. This inconsistency presents the question as to whether the claims recite a combination or subcombination. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation that is directed to the combination rather than to the subcombination because a vehicle is not an inherent component of the front frame structure. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Shibata et al. (hereinafter Shibata, WIPO Publication WO 2014097513). Regarding claim 1, Shibata discloses a front frame structure (Figures 1 and 4) for an electric vehicle, the front frame structure comprising: front side frames in a pair, the front side frames extending in a front-rear direction of a vehicle body of the electric vehicle and being disposed respectively on both sides in a vehicle width direction of a motor room provided in a front portion of the vehicle body (Figure 1 element 6); and impact absorbing members disposed at respective front ends of the front side frames (Figure 1 element 15); a bumper beam coupling the impact absorbing members (Figure 1 element 16); and a lower frame disposed in a lower portion of the motor room, both sides in the vehicle width direction of the lower frame being supported by the front side frames respectively (Figure 1 elements 8 and 45 ), wherein a power control unit comprising an electric motor is supported on a rear portion of the lower frame (Figure 15 element 150), wherein the front side frames are disposed respectively in extra spaces that are each defined with a side wall in the vehicle width direction of the motor room and a side surface of the power control unit (Figures 1 and 3), wherein a frame-shaped rigid member is disposed in an extra space in a front portion of the motor room (Figure 1 element 10), and wherein the front side frames are coupled to a rear surface of the frame-shaped rigid member, and the impact absorbing members are coupled to a front surface of the frame-shaped rigid member (Figures 1 and 3). Regarding claim 3, see figure 1 elements 11-13. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 4 and 5 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS A MCFALL whose telephone number is (571)270-5769. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached at (571)272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Nicholas McFall/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599238
NECK SUPPORTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600503
Modular, configurable airframe system for heavy lift rotary wing UAV
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595055
Payload Delivery Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589708
FRONT END MODULE FRAME OF VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589870
THE METHOD OF OBTAINING LIFT AND THRUST FOR HORIZONTAL FLIGHT OF VERTICAL TAKE-OFF AND LANDING FLYING MACHINE WHILE MAINTAINING THE HORIZONTAL STABILITY OF THE MACHINE'S FLIGHT AND THE MACHINE TO IMPLEMENT THIS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 524 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month