Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/430,142

SMART IOT CONTROLLER FOR GATHERING AND TRANSMITTING AIRCRAFT HEALTH INFORMATION DURING FLIGHT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 01, 2024
Examiner
SHAAWAT, MUSSA A
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
665 granted / 876 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§103
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§102
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 876 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Esterle US Pg. Pub. No. (2023/0406535) referred to hereinafter as Esterle. As per claim 1, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system (see at least Abstract, summary, figs. 2-7) comprising an in-flight controller, wherein the in-flight controller is configured to: responsive to a determination that an aircraft is in-flight, access a sensor network system of the aircraft to generate in-flight system health (IFSH) information (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, figs. 2-7); and initiate a transmission operation that transmits the IFSH information through a wireless communications path to a ground-based flight monitoring system (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 97, 98, figs. 2-7); wherein the ground-based flight monitoring system is operable to initiate an aircraft management operation associated with the aircraft (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 34, 39, 97, 98, figs. 2-7). As per claim 2, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to receive through the wireless communications path an IFSH change request (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 3, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 2, wherein the controller is further configured to, responsive to the IFSH change request, change an aspect of the IFSH information that is transmitted through the wireless communications path to the ground-based flight monitoring system (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 4, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 3, wherein the change to the aspect of the IFSH information comprises including an additional set of IFSH information with the IFSH information (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 5, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 3, wherein the change to the aspect of the IFSH information comprises changing an information sampling rate associated with generating the IFSH information (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 6, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 1, wherein the IFSH information comprises pre-processed IFSH information (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 7, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 6, wherein the controller is further configured to apply preprocessing operations to at least a portion of the IFSH information to generate the pre-processed IFSH information (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 8, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 7, wherein the pre-processing operations are selected from a group consisting of: condensing the portion of the IFSH information; and filtering the portion of the IFSH information (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 9, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 1, wherein the aircraft management operation comprises using IFSH information in a predictive analysis operation (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claim 10, Esterle teaches an aircraft health monitoring system of claim 9, wherein a result of the predictive analysis operation is provided to a flight management system associated with the aircraft (see at least Abstract, summary, Para 30, 34, 39, 97, 98, 136, 146, 149, figs. 2-7). As per claims 11-20, the limitations of claims 11-20 are similar to the limitations of claims 1-10, therefore they are rejected based on the same rationale. Conclusion Please refer to form 892 for cited references. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUSSA A SHAAWAT whose telephone number is (313)446-6592. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erin Piateski can be reached at 571-270-7429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUSSA A SHAAWAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595070
METHOD OF OPERATING A ROTORCRAFT IN A SINGLE ENGINE OPERATION MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595049
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A ROTORCRAFT, ASSOCIATED ROTORCRAFT AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583605
FAST THRUST RESPONSE USING OPTIMAL POWER SPLITTING IN HYBRID ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583606
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT ENERGY OPTIMIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576715
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+3.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 876 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month