Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/431,196

VEHICLE SEAT LONGITUDINAL ADJUSTMENT ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Examiner
CHEN, JOSE V
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Coburg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1701 granted / 2178 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
2202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.3%
+15.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§112
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2178 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nihonmatsu et al (20120032058). The reference to Nihonmatsu et al teaches structure as claimed including a vehicle seat comprising: a first rail assembly including a first fixed rail (12) and a first translatable rail (29); a second rail assembly including a second fixed rail (13a) and a second translatable rail (29); at least one locking device coupled to at least one of the first rail assembly and the second rail assembly, wherein the at least one locking device includes a locking lever (51, 56) and the at least one locking device is configured to selectively change between a locked state, in which the at least one locking device locks at least one of the first translatable rail and the second translatable rail to the first fixed rail and the second fixed rail, respectively, and an unlocked state in which the at least one locking device permits one of the first translatable rail and the second translatable rail to translate in a longitudinal direction along the one of the first fixed rail and the second fixed rail, respectively; and an actuation assembly (50) configured to rotate to actuate the locking lever to change the at least one locking device from the locked state to the unlocked state, wherein the actuation assembly is further configured to be fixed to the first and second rail assemblies by inserting the actuation assembly in a direction substantially parallel to the longitudinal direction and between the first rail assembly and the second rail assembly. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 10-20 are allowable over the prior art of record. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The references cited teach structure similar to applicant’s including actuation structure for locking and locking translatable seat structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE V CHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-6865. The examiner can normally be reached m-f, m-w 5:30-3:00, th5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy can be reached at 571 270 3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE V CHEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 12, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637219
PASSENGER SEAT TRAY TABLE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635791
ORIGAMI-BASED FOLDABLE FURNITURE ASSEMBLY
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635802
DECK SEATING ASSEMBLY
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636974
PIEZOELECTRIC SENSOR AND SEAT
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628948
MODULAR TABLES WITH ATTACHED SEAT(S)
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.2%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2178 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month