Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/431,460

Connection Failure Report for Multiple Transmission and Reception Points

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Examiner
TOWFIGHI, AFSHAWN M
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
828 granted / 946 resolved
+29.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
974
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 946 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/27/24 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hwang et al (Pub No: 2021/0266811). As to claim 1, Hwang teaches a method comprising (Hwang, [0186], a handling process): determining, by a wireless device, a failure of a communication connection with a special cell (Hwang, [0187], determining bay a UE the occurrence of a RLF in a connection between a sPcell in with the Pscell ([0186]); and sending, by the wireless device to a base station, a failure report (Hwang, [0187], reporting to a serving gNB a report about a RLF) indicating that the communication connection is: failed (Hwang, [0187], reporting to a serving gNB a report about a RLF (occurrence of a failure)); and associated with at least one cell configured as a resource of the special cell (Hwang, [0187], indication in the report includes ID of the special cell and cell group to which the special sell belongs (resource)). As to claim 2, Hwang teaches further comprising receiving, by the wireless device from the base station, configuration parameters for a plurality of cells comprising the special cell and the at least one cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for the secondary cells including the pscell). As to claim 3, Hwang teaches wherein the configuration parameters comprise: first configuration parameters of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell).; and second configuration parameters of the at least one cell configured as the resource of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell). As to claim 4, Hwang teaches wherein the first configuration parameters of the special cell comprise the second configuration parameters of the at least one cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell) as one MAC CE). As to claim 5, Hwang teaches wherein the second configuration parameters of the at least one cell are for the wireless device to use the at least one cell as at least one of: resources of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the parameters are for adding a scell as a resources of the spcell) As to claim 6, Hwang teaches wherein determining the failure of the communication connection is based on at least one of: a first reference signal of the special cell (Hwang, [0141], the RLF is determined based on a measured reference signal in the pscell [0187]) As to claim 7, Hwang teaches wherein the at least one cell is configured as at least one of: a neighbor cell of the special cell (Hwang, [0187] Fig 1, the scell is in a cell group (neighbor) of the pscell for which the RLF occurred) As to claim 8, Hwang teaches a wireless device (Hwang, [0186] Fig 12, a UE RLF handling process)comprising one or more processors and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (Hwang, [0208], memory and processor), cause the wireless device to: determine a failure of a communication connection with a special cell (Hwang, [0187], determining bay a UE the occurrence of a RLF in a connection between a sPcell in with the Pscell ([0186]); and send, to a base station, a failure report (Hwang, [0187], reporting to a serving gNB a report about a RLF) indicating that the communication connection is: failed (Hwang, [0187], reporting to a serving gNB a report about a RLF (occurrence of a failure)); and associated with at least one cell configured as a resource of the special cell (Hwang, [0187], indication in the report includes ID of the special cell and cell group to which the special sell belongs (resource)). As to claim 9, Hwang teaches wherein the instructions further cause the wireless device to receive, from the base station, configuration parameters for a plurality of cells comprising the special cell and the at least one cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for the secondary cells including the pscell). As to claim 10, Hwang teaches wherein the configuration parameters comprise: first configuration parameters of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell); and second configuration parameters of the at least one cell configured as the resource of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell). As to claim 11, Hwang teaches wherein the first configuration parameters of the special cell comprise the second configuration parameters of the at least one cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell) as one MAC CE). As to claim 12, Hwang teaches wherein the second configuration parameters of the at least one cell are for the wireless device to use the at least one cell as at least one of: resources of the special cell Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the parameters are for adding a scell as a resources of the spcell). As to claim 13, Hwang teaches wherein determining the failure of the communication connection is based on at least one of: a first reference signal of the special cell (Hwang, [0141], the RLF is determined based on a measured reference signal in the pscell [0187]) As to claim 14, Hwang teaches wherein the at least one cell is configured as at least one of: a neighbor cell of the special cell (Hwang, [0187] Fig 1, the scell is in a cell group (neighbor) of the pscell for which the RLF occurred) As to claim 15, Hwang teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors (Hwang, [0186] Fig 12, a UE RLF handling process), cause a wireless device to: determine a failure of a communication connection with a special cell (Hwang, [0187], determining bay a UE the occurrence of a RLF in a connection between a sPcell in with the Pscell ([0186]); and send, to a base station, a failure report (Hwang, [0187], reporting to a serving gNB a report about a RLF) indicating that the communication connection is: failed (Hwang, [0187], reporting to a serving gNB a report about a RLF (occurrence of a failure)); and associated with at least one cell configured as a resource of the special cell (Hwang, [0187], indication in the report includes ID of the special cell and cell group to which the special sell belongs (resource)). As to claim 16, Hwang teaches wherein the instructions further cause the wireless device to receive, from the base station, configuration parameters for a plurality of cells comprising the special cell and the at least one cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for the secondary cells including the pscell). As to claim 17, Hwang teaches wherein the configuration parameters comprise: first configuration parameters of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell) and second configuration parameters of the at least one cell configured as the resource of the special cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell). As to claim 18, Hwang teaches wherein the first configuration parameters of the special cell comprise the second configuration parameters of the at least one cell (Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the serving gNB sends parameter configuration for EACH of the secondary cells including the pscell) as one MAC CE). As to claim 19, Hwang teaches wherein the second configuration parameters of the at least one cell are for the wireless device to use the at least one cell as at least one of: resources of the special cell Hwang, Fig 12 [0188][0193], the parameters are for adding a scell as a resources of the spcell). As to claim 20, Hwang teaches wherein determining the failure of the communication connection is based on at least one of: a first reference signal of the special cell (Hwang, [0141], the RLF is determined based on a measured reference signal in the pscell [0187]) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Takahashi et al (Pub No: 2020/0022215) Fig 5. Nagasaka et al (Pub No: 2016/0338134) [0050][0199] Pietraski et al (Pub No: 2013/0153298) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AFSHAWN M TOWFIGHI whose telephone number is (571)270-7296. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM -5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian N Moore can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AFSHAWN M TOWFIGHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598140
CALCULATOR SYSTEM AND CONGESTION AVOIDANCE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598029
SIDELINK CARRIER AGGREGATION WITH CROSS-CARRIER RETRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588054
Message Transmission Method, Terminal and Storage Medium
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587253
BASE STATION AND METHOD FOR A COOPERATIVE SCHEME IN SIGNAL TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587263
Dual Path Switchable Repeater
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 946 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month