Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/431,471

Push to Connect Electrical Connector with Integral Release

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Priority
Feb 02, 2023 — provisional 63/442,898
Examiner
DRAGICEVICH, ZACHARY T
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hubbell Incorporated
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
575 granted / 723 resolved
+27.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 723 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-8, filed 27 March 2026 with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1 and 21 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made below. Applicant's arguments regarding claim 11 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the first receiving area of Fardon is not “designed to receive a conduit” but rather a sealing element. This is not found persuasive. It is noted that the conduit is recited functionally. While features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431-32 (Fed. Cir. 1997). There is nothing preventing the first receiving area from receiving a conduit, and thus it is capable of performing the claimed function. Thus, the limitation has been met. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 11-16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fardon et al. (US 2023/0341071 hereinafter “Fardon”). For clarification purposes, please refer to the annotated fig. 2 of Fardon below: PNG media_image1.png 344 707 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 11, Fardon discloses a conduit receiving port removably attachable to an electrical box, the conduit receiving port comprising: a base member (110) comprising a plurality of conduit receiving portions (see annotated fig.), each of the plurality of conduit receiving portions having a different diameter each for receiving and holding a different diameter conduit; a conduit gripping member (140) comprising at least one prong for securing at least one of the different diameter conduits received and held in the conduit receiving portions; and a conduit release member (160, 170, 180) selectively operable to displace the at least one prong for selectively releasing the conduit held in the conduit receiving portions. In regards to claim 12, Fardon further discloses the base member is configured to be attached to an opening of an electrical box (fig. 1 shows this capability). In regards to claim 13, Fardon further discloses at least a portion (see at '110" in fig. 1) of the base member is dimensioned to rest against an outside surface surrounding the opening of the electrical box. In regards to claim 14, Fardon further discloses at least a portion (at "111") of the base member is dimensioned to be received in the electrical box. In regards to claim 15, Fardon further discloses the base member comprises a plurality of rings (see two different inner diameters in fig. 2) each having a different inner diameter and each for receiving a conduit having a different outer diameter. In regards to claim 16, Fardon further discloses a retaining clip (150) for securing the conduit gripping member in the base member. In regards to claim 18, Fardon further discloses the conduit release member is rotatable within the base member about a first axis (A). In regards to claim 19, Fardon further discloses the conduit release member moves up and down along the first axis as the conduit release member is rotated within the base in clockwise and counterclockwise directions about the first axis (see abstract). In regards to claim 20, Fardon further discloses the conduit release member selectively displaces the at least one prong to release the conduit when the conduit release member is rotated within the base in one of the clockwise and counterclockwise directions (see abstract). Claims 1-16 and 18-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kluss et al. (USP 8,322,755 hereinafter “Kluss”). In regards to claim 1, Kluss discloses a conduit receiving port (see figs. 10-12b) comprising: a base member (131) configured to receive at least one conduit; a conduit gripping member (142) configured to grip the at least one conduit; and a conduit release member (145, 133) operable for selectively releasing the gripping member's grip on the at least one conduit, wherein the conduit release member is rotatably affixed to the base member such that rotation of the conduit release member in a first direction causes the conduit release member to move longitudinally toward the conduit gripping member releasing the gripping members grip on the at least one conduit and rotation of the conduit release member in a second direction different than the first direction causes the conduit release member to move longitudinally away from the conduit gripping member (see column 11, lines 1-19). In regards to claims 2 and 12, Kluss further discloses the base member is configured to be attached to an opening of an electrical box (fig. 10 shows this capability). In regards to claims 3 and 13, Kluss further discloses at least a portion (see at '131" in fig. 1) of the base member is dimensioned to rest against an outside surface surrounding the opening of the electrical box. In regards to claims 4 and 14, Kluss further discloses at least a portion (at "134") of the base member is dimensioned to be received in the electrical box. In regards to claims 5 and 15, Kluss further discloses the base member comprises a plurality of rings (see two different inner diameters in fig. 11) each having a different inner diameter and each for receiving a conduit having a different outer diameter. In regards to claims 6 and 16, Kluss further discloses a retaining clip (134) for securing the conduit gripping member in the base member. In regards to claims 8 and 18, Kluss further discloses the conduit release member is rotatable within the base member about a first axis (central axis). In regards to claims 9 and 19, Kluss further discloses the conduit release member moves up and down along the first axis as the conduit release member is rotated within the base in clockwise and counterclockwise directions about the first axis (see column 11, lines 1-19). In regards to claim 11, Kluss discloses a conduit receiving port removably attachable to an electrical box, the conduit receiving port comprising: a base member (131) comprising a plurality of conduit receiving portions (see top end in fig. 11 and bottom end in fig. 11), each of the plurality of conduit receiving portions having a different diameter each for receiving and holding a different diameter conduit; a conduit gripping member (132) comprising at least one prong for securing at least one of the different diameter conduits received and held in the conduit receiving portions; and a conduit release member (145, 133) selectively operable to displace the at least one prong for selectively releasing the conduit held in the conduit receiving portions (see column 11, lines 1-19). In regards to claims 10 and 20, Kluss further discloses the conduit release member selectively displaces the at least one prong to release the conduit when the conduit release member is rotated within the base in one of the clockwise and counterclockwise directions (see column 11, lines 1-19). In regards to claim 21, Kluss discloses a conduit receiving port removably attachable to an electrical box, the conduit receiving port comprising: a base member (131) comprising a plurality of conduit receiving portions, each of the plurality of conduit receiving portions having a different diameter each for receiving and holding a different diameter conduit (see top end and bottom end in fig. 11); a conduit gripping member (132) comprising at least one prong for securing at least one of the different diameter conduits received and held in the conduit receiving portions; and a conduit release member (145, 133) selectively operable to displace the at least one prong for selectively releasing the conduit held in the conduit receiving portions, wherein the conduit release member is rotatably affixed to the base member such that rotation of the conduit release member in a first direction causes the conduit release member to move longitudinally toward the conduit gripping member displacing the at least one prong and releasing the gripping member from the at least one of the different diameter conduit and rotation of the conduit release member in a second direction different than the first direction causes the conduit release member to move longitudinally away from the conduit gripping member (see column 11, lines 1-19). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fardon as applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of Crompton et al. (USP 11,035,510 hereinafter "Crompton"). In regards to claim 17, Fardon discloses the port of claim 11 and further discloses the at least one prong comprises a plurality of sets of prongs. Fardon does not disclose each of the plurality of sets of prongs being sized differently. However, Crompton teaches a similar port with a gripping member (25) having a plurality of sets of prongs (27A, 27B), each of the plurality of sets of prongs being sized differently (see fig. 6). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the gripping member of Fardon with sets of prongs being sized differently, in order to allow conduits of different diameters to be snugly retained in the port, as taught by Crompton at column 6, line 60 - column 7, line 27. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kluss as applied to claim 11 above, and further in view of Crompton. In regards to claim 17, Kluss discloses the port of claim 11 and further discloses the at least one prong comprises a plurality of sets of prongs. Kluss does not disclose each of the plurality of sets of prongs being sized differently. However, Crompton teaches a similar port with a gripping member (25) having a plurality of sets of prongs (27A, 27B), each of the plurality of sets of prongs being sized differently (see fig. 6). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the gripping member of Kluss with sets of prongs being sized differently, in order to allow conduits of different diameters to be snugly retained in the port, as taught by Crompton at column 6, line 60 - column 7, line 27. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZACHARY T DRAGICEVICH whose telephone number is (571)270-0505. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 - 4:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew D. Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZACHARY T DRAGICEVICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679 05/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jun 18, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 08, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Oct 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703108
APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING AUTOMATED CONNECTION
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698860
TESTABLE TERMINATION FITTING
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692960
MITIGATION OF VIBRATION IN PIPE SYSTEMS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692966
Device for Connecting a Water Pipe to a Component Having a Passage
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680633
GROOVE-FREE QUICK-INSERT PIPE CLAMP AND PROCESSING DEVICE THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 10m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 723 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month