Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/431,760

IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-EXECUTABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 02, 2024
Examiner
TSAI, TSUNG YIN
Art Unit
2656
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Pfu Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
804 granted / 984 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1015
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 984 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of claims: claims 1-8 are examined below. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/2/2024 was filed and considered. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yoshida (US 2018/0084152). Claim 1, similarly claims 7-8: Yoshida (US 2018/0084152) anticipated the following subject matter: An image processing apparatus, comprising: processing circuitry configured to (figure 2 and 0048-0049 teaches use of processor or MPU): identify an outer edge of a document with respect to image data optically read from the document (0028 and 0030 detail the use of optical system 113 and image sensor 114 to image document sheet, where 0054 further detail identify document sheet area with calculating edge detection of detecting boundary position between document sheet and outside-document-sheet area (edge and background)); and fill an outside from the outer edge in the image data with a predetermined color (0109 detail background processing portion with corresponding different color, where paragraph 0103 detail background replacement data to satisfies a predetermined replacement pixel value set in advance (predetermine color)). Regarding method of claim 7, 0009 detail carryout method as well as image reading device and apparatus. Regarding non-transitory computer media of claim 8, figure 2 and 0048-0050 detail storage portion of the system. Claim 2: The image processing apparatus according to claim 1,wherein the processing circuitry is configured to fill the outside from the outer edge with the predetermined color different from a background color of the document (0109 detail background processing potion with corresponding different color, where paragraph 0103 detail background replacement data to satisfies a predetermined replacement pixel value set in advance (predetermine color)) used when the image data is optically read (0028 and 0030 detail the use of optical system 113 and image sensor 1114 to image document sheet). Claim 3: The image processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to fill the outside from the outer edge with the predetermined color associated with software that transfers the image data (0085-0086 teaches different color corresponding to post-processing portions 856). Claim 4: The image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to identify positions of a plurality of end points constituting ends of the document based on a gradation change in the image data, connect the plurality of end points, and determine the outer edge of the document (0083; 0107-0109 setting of background data with outside/edge due to different gradation with respect to different data sequence and different colors). Claim 5: The image processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to correct a position of one end point based on other end points existing in a vicinity of the one end point, and determine the outer edge of the document based on the corrected position of the one end point (figures 7-8 and 0095-0097 detail approximate (vicinity) of the outside-document-sheet(edge/endpoint of document and background) area due to Xon-off (end point) difference data from subtracting light on/off from sampling portion 855). Claim 6: The image processing apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to perform correction processing according to which side of the document the plurality of end points correspond to (figures 7-8 and 0095-0097 detail difference of data (correction) with approximate range of intermediate to maximum level of the pixel data to be outside-document-sheet area (edge/end point and which side of document)). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. MIYASHITA et al (US 2020/0120236) teaches IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING A THRESHOLD FOR EXTRACTING AN EDGE PIXEL BASED ON A REGION CORRESPONDING TO A SURFACE FACING AN IMAGING DEVICE – 0062 teaches gradation value is a luminance value or a color value. The second edge pixel extractor 223 extracts the first (leftmost) pixel having a neighboring difference value equal to or larger than the second threshold as a second edge pixel corresponding to the left side of the document, and 0107 teaches difference between the gradation value of the background color of the document and that of the color of the document backing, and the boundary between the document, and Hence, the information processing apparatus 200 can suitably detect the boundary between the document and the document backing even when the background color of the document is close to the color of the document backing. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TSUNG-YIN TSAI whose telephone number is (571)270-1671. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhavesh Mehta can be reached at (571) 272-7453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TSUNG YIN TSAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597118
IMAGE INSPECTION APPARATUS, IMAGE INSPECTION METHOD, AND IMAGE INSPECTION PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597237
INFERENCE LEARNING DEVICE AND INFERENCE LEARNING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12579797
VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573029
IMAGE ANNOTATION USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567235
Visual Explanation of Classification
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 984 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month