DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
This Office Action acknowledges the applicant’s amendment filed on 1/6/2026. Claims 1, 4-7 and 9 are pending in the application. Claims 2-3, 8 and 10 are cancelled.
The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office Action.
PNG
media_image1.png
434
474
media_image1.png
Greyscale
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
Claim(s) 1 and 4-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over in view of LU et al. US 2011/0155598 A1 in view of CHIU et al. US 2019/0214287 A1.
With regards to claim 1, LU discloses (Fig. 2-6) a reticle pod, comprising: a lower cover 12 having a carrying surface and a plurality of mounting seats (corners where hole 111 and fastener 125 extends through); and a support mechanism 100 having a supporting member 131 extending upward for supporting a reticle or a reticle carrier and a mounting member 121 opposite to the supporting member, wherein the support mechanism has a lateral extension portion 150, a first inclined arm (shown above with 141) extending from the lateral extension portion and a second inclined arm (shown above with 141) extending from the lateral extension portion, wherein the first inclined arm and the second inclined arm are configured to support a bottom of the reticle or a bottom of the reticle carrier.
LU discloses the support mechanisms 100 are mounted at the corners of the lower cover but it does not specifically disclose they are detachably connected to the mounting seats.
However, CHIU (Fig. 6) teaches that it was known in the art to have reticle pod have a plurality of support mechanisms detachably connected to the mounting seats (with the fasteners 124). (Para. 0045)
It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mounting seat and mounting member in LU by having the support mechanism detachably connected to the mounting member as taught by CHIU for the purposes of providing an alternative way of connecting the two structures together.
With regards to claim 4, the combination of LU and CHIU discloses the mounting member is configured to connect to the corresponding mounting seat by a male-female connection (fastener and the aperture the fastener extends through) to avoid the support mechanism (100; LU) from rotating relatively to the corresponding mounting seat 111/125. (Para. 0029)
With regards to claim 5, the combination of LU and CHIU further teaches the mounting member 123 is a female connector and the corresponding mounting seat is a male connector 125.
With regards to claim 6, the combination of LU and CHIU (Fig. 2; shown above) discloses the first inclined arm and the second inclined arm extend toward different edges of the reticle or the reticle carrier for limiting a side displacement of the reticle or the carrier, depending on the reticle or the carrier, to be held.
PNG
media_image2.png
520
576
media_image2.png
Greyscale
PNG
media_image3.png
320
389
media_image3.png
Greyscale
Claim(s) 7 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CHEN et al. US 2008/0254377 A1 in view of LU et al. US 2011/0155598 A1 and further in view of Maeda et al. US 3,816,882, previously presented.
With regards to claim 7, CHEN (Fig. 5A and Para. 0043) discloses a reticle pod 1, comprising: an upper cover 11 having an abutting surface and a plurality of upper-cover mounting seats (Para. 0034 and 0043; corners where base 31 of support mechanism 3 sits) located on the abutting surface; a lower cover 12 having a carrying surface and a plurality of lower-cover mounting seats located on the carrying surface (Para. 0034 and 0043; corners where base 31 of support mechanism 3 sits); at least one first support mechanism (3; on the lower cover) having a supporting member 32 extending upward for supporting a reticle or a reticle carrier and a mounting member 31 /311 opposite to the supporting member, wherein the first support mechanism has a lateral extension portion 313, a first inclined arm (shown above) extending from the lateral extension portion and a second inclined arm (shown above) extending from the lateral extension portion, wherein the first inclined arm and the second inclined arm are configured to support a bottom of the reticle or a bottom of the reticle carrier; and at least one second support mechanism (3; on the upper cover) having an abutting portion (shown above) for abutting a top of the reticle and a joint portion (shown above) connecting with the abutting portion,
Chen discloses the support mechanisms 3 are mounted (mounting seats) at the corners of the lower cover but it does not specifically disclose the mounting seats extending from the carrying surface; wherein the mounting member is configured to be detachably connected to the corresponding one of the mounting seats such that the support mechanism is optionally loaded to the lower cover; and wherein the mounting member is configured to connect to the corresponding lower-cover mounting seat by male-female connection.
However, Lu teaches that it was known in the art to have mounting seats 111/125 extending from the carrying surface (of cover 12) and support mechanisms 100 detachably connected to the mounting seats; and wherein the mounting member is configured to connect to the corresponding lower-cover mounting seat by male-female connection 111/125.
It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the mounting seat and mounting member in Chen by having the mounting seat extend from the surface to the mounting member as taught by LU for the purposes of providing an alternative way of connecting the two structures together.
The combination of CHEN and LU discloses an upper-cover mounting seat but it does not specifically disclose the upper-cover mounting seat, such that the second support mechanism is optionally loaded to the upper cove, has multiple protruding wing portions, the joint portion of the second support mechanism has an opening defined therethrough, the opening has a first channel that allows the protruding wing portions enter therein or depart therefrom, and the opening has a second channel that allows the protruding wing portions rotate relatively to the opening.
However, Maeda (Fig. 6-8) teaches it was known in the art to have a mounting seat 38 has multiple protruding wing portions 41/42, a joint portion of a second support mechanism has an opening defined therethrough, the opening has a first channel 34/35 that allows the protruding wing portions enter therein or depart therefrom, and the opening has a second channel 36/37 that allows the protruding wing portions rotate relatively to the opening.
As recited above, Maeda teaches that it is known in the art that fastening mechanisms are interchangeable. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have upper-cover mounting seat in CHEN by providing the mounting seat with multiple protruding wing portions, a joint portion of a second support mechanism having an opening with a first channel and second channel to allow the protruding wing portions to enter or depart and allows the protruding wing portions to rotate relatively to the opening as taught by Maeda for the purposes of providing an alternative method of attaching the structures together
With regards to claim 9, the combination of CHEN, LU, and MAEDA further teaches male-female connection 111/125 between the mounting member 123 of the first support mechanism and the lower-cover mounting seat prevents the first support mechanism from rotating relatively to the lower-cover mounting seat.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 4-7 and 9 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. However, with regards to the Applicant’s argument that Chen does not disclose a first inclined arm extending from the lateral extension portion and a second inclined arm extending from the lateral extension portion. The Examiner has interpreted the reference of LU differently and also, looking at Chen in a different perspective, it appears Chen discloses first inclined arm 312 extending from the lateral extension portion (highlighted above) and a second inclined arm 312 extending from the lateral extension portion (highlighted above).
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENINE SPICER whose telephone number is (313)446-4924. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am-5:00pm, Monday-Thursday.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Avilés can be reached at (571) 270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ROBERT J HICKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
/JENINE SPICER/Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Prosecution Insights