Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/432,255

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CHANGING SETTING VALUE OF BATTERY PACK, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING COMPUTER PROGRAM TO EXECUTE THE METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Priority
Sep 15, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0123129
Examiner
SAVUSDIPHOL, PAULTEP
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
587 granted / 762 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
780
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 762 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. Claims 1-14 have been presented for examination. Priority 2. Acknowledgement is made to Applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement 3. Acknowledgement is made to the information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/1/2024 & 5/29/2025. The information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu (US 2021/0402954 A1). Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses a method of changing a setting value of a battery pack (500 – battery pack) provided in a set, the method comprising: obtaining, by a battery management system (BMS) of the battery pack, a first authentication key from the set [0063-0065]; authenticating, by the BMS, the set based on the first authentication key [0063-0069]; and changing, by the BMS, a setting value for an operation of the battery pack with a value based on whether the set is authenticated [0063-0069]. Regarding claim 2, Liu discloses the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the authenticating of the set comprises: identifying the first authentication key indicating mutual authentication between the set and the BMS; and identifying the set based on the first authentication key [0063-0067]. Regarding claim 3, Liu discloses the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the changing of the setting value comprises: identifying the first authentication key, and changing, by the BMS, the setting value with a user value corresponding to the set; or failing to identify the first authentication key, and changing, by the BMS, the setting value with a default value [0063-0070]. Regarding claim 4, Liu discloses the method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: receiving, by the BMS, a second authentication key requesting a change of the setting value from the set; and changing, by the BMS, the setting value based on a change request value received from the set in response to whether the second authentication key is identified [0053-0055 & 0063-0067]. Regarding claim 5, Liu discloses the method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the changing of the setting value based on the change request value comprises: determining whether the change request value is within a range between a minimum value and a maximum value of the setting value; and changing the setting value if the change request value is within the range [0063-0069]. Regarding claim 6, Liu discloses a recording medium having recorded thereon a computer program to execute on a computing device the method as claimed in claim 5 [0122-0126]. Regarding claim 7, Liu discloses the method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the changing of the setting value based on the change request value further comprises updating a user value corresponding to the set with the change request value [0063-0069]. Regarding claim 8, Liu discloses a recording medium having recorded thereon a computer program to execute, on a computing device, the method as claimed in claim 1 [0122-0126]. Regarding claim 9, Liu discloses an apparatus for changing a setting value of a battery pack (500 – battery pack) provided in a set, the apparatus comprising a battery management system (BMS) of the battery pack that is configured to obtain a first authentication key from the set, to authenticate the set based on the first authentication key, and to change the setting value for an operation of the battery pack with a value based on whether the set is authenticated [0063-0069]. Regarding claim 10, Liu discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 9, wherein the BMS is further configured to identify the first authentication key indicating mutual authentication between the set and the BMS, and to identify the set based on the first authentication key [0063-0067]. Regarding claim 11, Liu discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 9, wherein the BMS is further configured to identify the first authentication key and change the setting value with a user value corresponding to the set, or to fail to identify the first authentication key and change the setting value with a default value [0063-0070]. Regarding claim 12, Liu discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 9, wherein the BMS is further configured to receive a second authentication key requesting a change of the setting value from the set, and to change the setting value based on a change request value received from the set in response to whether the second authentication key is identified [0053-0055 & 0063-0067]. Regarding claim 13, Liu discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 12, wherein the BMS is further configured to determine whether the change request value is within a range between a minimum value and a maximum value of the setting value, and to change the setting value if the change request value is within the range [0063-0069]. Regarding claim 14, Liu discloses the apparatus as claimed in claim 13, wherein the BMS is further configured to update a user value corresponding to the set with the change request value [0063-0069]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL whose telephone number is (571)270-1301. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F,7-3 EST. If the examiner cannot be reached by telephone, he can be reached through the following email address: paultep.savusdiphol@uspto.gov Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone and email are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas K. Pham can be reached on (571) 272-3689. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766211
AN INDICATOR, AND ASSOCIATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762899
System and Method for Expanded Baggage Information Messages
1y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12749084
LOGICAL VALIDATION OF DEVICES AGAINST FRAUD AND TAMPERING
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749349
SECURITY, LUGGAGE TRACKING, AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743721
DEVICE FOR AIDING VISUALLY IMPAIRED OR BLIND PERSONS WHILE SHOPPING
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 762 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month