Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/432,259

FOLDABLE POP-UP BANNER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Priority
Mar 28, 2023 — provisional 63/455,175
Examiner
GRABOWSKI, KYLE ROBERT
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
American Greetings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
650 granted / 1346 resolved
-3.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1406
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
75.6%
+35.6% vs TC avg
§102
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1346 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The 8,476,690 patent in the IDS does not match Levi (Issued 1907). Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: the recitation “wherein when chain…” should read either “wherein when [the/said] chain…”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claim 9 recites “…the pop-up element moves from a first or flat position, to a second, raised position” which is unclear. Claim 9 recites “at least two pop-up elements”, including a “first pop-up element” and a “second pop-up element”, thus it is unclear which of the pop-up elements are being referenced. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 16-20 are allowed. Claims 9-15 may be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. None of the cited prior art, below, anticipates or renders obvious all of the limitations of independent claims 1, 9, or 16, particularly a banner having a chain of links/panels, wherein the first and last link/panel includes loops/holding element, and the functionality of “wherein when the first and second panels are spaced apart and suspended from their respective hanging devices, the first and second pop-up elements move from a flat position to a raised position” (claim 1), with claims 9 and 16 reciting very similar language. A chain having links/panels is known in the art, for example in Saccoman (Fr 2,833,519). Also, pop-up elements with similar constructions are known in the art, for example in Whittredge (US 5,383,292). There is no teaching however, of combination of the references. In Whittredge, like it other similar patents, the pop-up element is manually engaged by a user. Thus, there is no teaching of providing a pop-up element which utilizes the pull-device as a suspension device for a chain banner, in particular with the first and last panels/links. Lucas (US 720,367), Bartels et al. (D250,101), Inventor (JP 3209973), and Schmidt (DE 20-2017-000-565), disclose similar inventions. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLE ROBERT GRABOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3518. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy, can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYLE R GRABOWSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12616169
Livestock Ear Tag System
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611885
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HEAT RESISTANT COATINGS
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12608992
BILL BINDING AND ENCODING DEVICE AND A CLASSIFICATION FILING SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12603020
DISPLAY STAND WITH CARDBOARD BASE
1y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600160
PERSONALIZABLE SECURITY DOCUMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1346 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month