Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/432,259

FOLDABLE POP-UP BANNER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
GRABOWSKI, KYLE ROBERT
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
American Greetings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
647 granted / 1341 resolved
-3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
1399
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1341 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The 8,476,690 patent in the IDS does not match Levi (Issued 1907). Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: the recitation “wherein when chain…” should read either “wherein when [the/said] chain…”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claim 9 recites “…the pop-up element moves from a first or flat position, to a second, raised position” which is unclear. Claim 9 recites “at least two pop-up elements”, including a “first pop-up element” and a “second pop-up element”, thus it is unclear which of the pop-up elements are being referenced. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 and 16-20 are allowed. Claims 9-15 may be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. None of the cited prior art, below, anticipates or renders obvious all of the limitations of independent claims 1, 9, or 16, particularly a banner having a chain of links/panels, wherein the first and last link/panel includes loops/holding element, and the functionality of “wherein when the first and second panels are spaced apart and suspended from their respective hanging devices, the first and second pop-up elements move from a flat position to a raised position” (claim 1), with claims 9 and 16 reciting very similar language. A chain having links/panels is known in the art, for example in Saccoman (Fr 2,833,519). Also, pop-up elements with similar constructions are known in the art, for example in Whittredge (US 5,383,292). There is no teaching however, of combination of the references. In Whittredge, like it other similar patents, the pop-up element is manually engaged by a user. Thus, there is no teaching of providing a pop-up element which utilizes the pull-device as a suspension device for a chain banner, in particular with the first and last panels/links. Lucas (US 720,367), Bartels et al. (D250,101), Inventor (JP 3209973), and Schmidt (DE 20-2017-000-565), disclose similar inventions. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLE ROBERT GRABOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3518. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy, can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYLE R GRABOWSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603020
DISPLAY STAND WITH CARDBOARD BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600160
PERSONALIZABLE SECURITY DOCUMENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594488
Challenge Cribbage Game Device and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593820
Livestock Management System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582898
HANDSFREE DICE ROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1341 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month