Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/432,832

BALE IDENTIFICATION USING NET WRAP CHARACTERISTIC

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
SAFAIPOUR, BOBBAK
Art Unit
2665
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Deere & Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
933 granted / 1085 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1085 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements submitted on 02/05/2024 and 06/30/2025 have been considered by the Examiner and made of record in the application file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kraus (US 2022/0067371 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Kraus discloses a bale identification system comprising: (paragraphs 11 and 34) an initial image sensor operable to capture an initial image of an initial bale bound with a wrap material; (paragraphs 5, 11, 35-37 and 51) a computing device in communication with the initial image sensor and operable to receive the initial image from the initial image sensor, wherein the computing device includes a processor and a memory having a bale identification algorithm stored thereon, wherein the processor is operable to execute the bale identification algorithm to: (paragraphs 11-14, 37, 41, 46 and 51) analyze the initial image to identify a unique wrap characteristic on the wrap material of the initial bale in the initial image; (paragraphs 5, 11-14, 29, 33 and 52) associate the unique wrap characteristic identified from the wrap material with the initial bale; (paragraphs 5, 11-14 and 53-56) save the initial image and the associated unique wrap characteristic in the memory of the computing device, such that the identified unique wrap characteristic of the initial bale is used as an identifier of the initial bale; (paragraphs 5, 11-14 and 53-56) a second image sensor operable to capture a second image of a second bale, wherein the second image sensor is disposed in communication with the computing device for communicating the second image to the computing device; (paragraphs 11-14, 38 and 53-56) compare the second image of the second bale to the unique wrap characteristic identified in the initial image of the initial bale to determine if the second image of the second bale includes the unique wrap characteristic identified in the initial image; and (paragraphs 8, 11-14 and 53-56) determine that the second bale from the second image is the initial bale from the initial image when the unique wrap characteristic is identified in the second image of the second bale. (paragraphs 8, 11-14 and 53-56) Regarding claim 2, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the unique wrap characteristic includes a random splotch pattern. (paragraphs 29, 32 and 33) Regarding claim 3, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the random splotch pattern includes a two-dimensional pattern. (paragraphs 29, 32 and 52) Regarding claim 4, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the random splotch pattern includes a three-dimensional pattern. (paragraphs 28, 36 and 52) Regarding claim 5, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the random splotch pattern includes a randomly created pattern applied onto the wrap material. (paragraphs 29, 32-33 and 35) Regarding claim 6, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the random splotch pattern includes a randomly created pattern formed during manufacture of the wrap material. (paragraphs 18, 29 and 32) Regarding claim 7, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the wrap material includes one of a solid wrap material or a net wrap material. (paragraphs 28 and 35) Regarding claim 8, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the processor is operable to execute the bale identification algorithm to associate data related to the initial bale with the identified unique wrap characteristic of the initial bale. (paragraphs 12 and 54) Regarding claim 9, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the second image sensor includes a handheld device. (paragraphs 7, 13 and 38) Regarding claim 10, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein further comprising an output disposed in communication with the computing device and operable to receive a signal from the computing device, wherein the processor is operable to execute the bale identification algorithm to communicate data related to the initial bale associated with the unique wrap characteristic to the output when the unique wrap characteristic is identified in the second image of the second bale. (paragraphs 15, 39 and 58) Regarding claim 12, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the processor is operable to execute the bale identification algorithm to receive a second image of a second bale captured by a second image sensor and compare the second image of the second bale to the unique wrap characteristic of the wrap material on the initial bale to determine if the second image of the second bale includes the unique wrap characteristic identified in the initial image, or if the second image of the second bale does not include the unique wrap characteristic identified in the initial image. (paragraphs 13-14 and 35-36) Regarding claim 13, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the processor is operable to execute the bale identification algorithm to determine that the second bale from the second image is the initial bale from the initial image when the unique wrap characteristic is identified in the second image of the second bale. (paragraphs 14 and 56) Regarding claim 14, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the processor is operable to execute the bale identification algorithm to communicate the data associated with the initial bale to an output when the unique wrap characteristic is identified in the second image of the second bale. (paragraphs 15 and 58) Regarding claim 15, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the baler implement includes a marking applicator operable to apply a marking material onto the wrap material to form a random splotch pattern on the wrap material, whereby the random splotch pattern is the unique wrap characteristic. (paragraphs 28-29 and 32-36) Regarding claim 16, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the marking applicator is operable to apply the marking material onto the wrap material to form a three-dimensional splotch pattern. (paragraphs 28-29 and 32-36) Regarding claim 17, Kraus discloses the claimed invention wherein the wrap material includes one of a solid wrap material or a net wrap material. (paragraphs 38 and 35) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BOBBAK SAFAIPOUR whose telephone number is (571)270-1092. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Koziol can be reached at (408) 918-7630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOBBAK SAFAIPOUR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597155
TRACKING THREE-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRIC SHAPES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597113
FABRIC DEFECT DETECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591987
System and Method for Simultaneously Registering Multiple Lung CT Scans for Quantitative Lung Analysis
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586140
Automated Property Inspections
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586240
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1085 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month