Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/432,900

HIGH TEMPERATURE PYROLYSIS OF HYDROCARBONS IN MOLTEN SALTS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
OLADAPO, TAIWO
Art Unit
1771
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Braskem America Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
605 granted / 1144 resolved
-12.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
89 currently pending
Career history
1233
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1144 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 – 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by Brownscombe et al. (US 2005/0148487) or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Brownscombe et al. (US 2005/0148487) In regards to claim 1, Brownscombe teaches method of decomposing a polymeric feed with one or more inorganic salt catalyst to produce liquid products (abstract). The feed can include polyolefins, polyethylene, polypropylene, rubber, tires, waste plastics which are carbonaceous materials (hydrocarbons) [0008]. The process requires contacting the feed with hydrogen source such as methane, ethane, propane, butane, naphtha, etc., in the presence of inorganic salt catalysts at temperatures of from 200 to 500℃ [0048, 0074, 0075]. The contacting with catalyst can occur in a fixed bed reactor, CSTR, etc. [0077]. The contacting temperature can range from 200 to 800℃ in the presence of the hydrogen source and other gases such as argon, nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane, butane, ethene etc. and combinations [0079]. The products include olefin mixtures [0094 – 0096]. The inorganic salt catalyst includes alkali metal carbonates, alkaline earth metal carbonates etc., and mixtures [0114]. The process is an oxygen-free process. The process also does not require the presence of transition metal or rare earth metal, or their oxides as catalysts. The products including olefin mixtures are collected [0164]. Thus, the process of cracking a carbon feedstock to produce olefins by contacting a feedstock with molten salt catalyst (i.e., matrix) at high temperatures and collecting the olefin product stream is provided [0077]. In regards to claim 2, Brownscombe teaches the process comprising the carbonates such as potassium carbonate [0022, 0114]. In regards to claims 3, 4, Brownscombe teaches the process comprising the claimed reactors as previously stated. However, it is noted that the claims are to processes and not to the equipment or reactor used for performing the process which do not carry patentable weight as they do not further limit the process. In regards to claims 5 – 7, Brownscombe teaches the process having the claimed olefins as previously stated. In regards to claims 8 – 12, Brownscombe teaches the process having the claimed temperatures as previously stated. In regards to claims 13, 14, Brownscombe teaches the process as previously stated. The limitations drawn to the reactor, and whether or not the feedstock is top-fed or bottom-fed do not carry patentable weight. In regards to claims 15, 16, Brownscombe teaches the process which takes place at from 0.1 to 20 MPa (i.e., from 1 atm to 200 atm) [0079]. In regards to claims 17 – 22, Brownscombe teaches the process having the claimed limitations as previously discussed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAIWO OLADAPO whose telephone number is (571)270-3723. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Prem Singh can be reached at 571-272-6381. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAIWO OLADAPO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590262
ANTI-FRICTION COMPOSITE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590263
LUBRICANT ADDITIVE, LUBRICANT COMPOSITION, AND WORKING FLUID COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584078
Method for Producing Lubricating Greases of Lithium Complex Soaps and Lithium-Calcium-Complex Soaps
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570911
A MARINE FUEL BLEND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571073
ALUMINUM BRONZE ALLOY AND SLIDING MEMBER USING SAID ALLOY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1144 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month