Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/432,982

AUTOMATED INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSESSMENT AND DISPLAY

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Priority
Jan 17, 2023 — continuation of 11/727,702 +1 more
Examiner
BAKER, CHARLOTTE M
Art Unit
2664
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Velocityehs Holdings Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1007 granted / 1085 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1095
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§103
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1085 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-21 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,177,790. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLOTTE M BAKER whose telephone number is (571)272-7459. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JENNIFER MEHMOOD can be reached at (571)272-2976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLOTTE M BAKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2664 16 January 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Jul 21, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700227
MULTIMODAL FEW-SHOT LEARNING WITH FROZEN LANGUAGE MODELS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694342
METHOD FOR CATEGORIZING A SCENE COMPRISING A SUB-SCENE WITH MACHINE LEARNING
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688587
Systems and Methods for Detection, Prediction, and Value Estimation of Activities and Events
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682628
METHODS AND APPARATUS LOCALIZING OBJECT(S) IN VISION DATA
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676937
PRINT MEDIUM SPECIFICATION METHOD AND PRINT MEDIUM SPECIFICATION SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+0.1%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1085 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month