Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/433,069

Methods of Treating Testosterone Deficiency

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
HUI, SAN MING R
Art Unit
1627
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Tolmar, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
757 granted / 1284 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1335
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1284 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/18/2026 has been entered. Claims 31-36, 40, 42, 45, 46, 48-60 are pending. The outstanding rejection under 35 USC 103a is withdrawn in view of the applicant’s arguments along with the amendments to the claims filed 2/18/2026. As the claims are directed to the use of a testosterone undecanoate formulation with specific excipients and amount range, in a specific dosage, to give rise to the herein claimed results of 75% of patients having Cavg in the range of about 300 ng/dL to about 1100 ng/dL, and less than about 5% having Cmax in the range of about 1800 ng/dL to about 2500 ng/dL, the cited prior art does not read on or render the claims obvious. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 31-36, 40, 42, 45, 46, 48-60 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The limitation “at least about 75% of the population has a Cav, in the range of about 300 ng/dL to about 1100 ng/dL, and less than about 5% of the population has a Cmax in the range of about 1800 ng/dL to about 2500 ng/dL” recited in claims 31, 52, and 57 is not supported by the originally filed specification or claims. The limitation “wherein greater than or equal to about 85% of the population has a Cmax below about 1500 ng/dL.” Recited in claim 49, 56, and 60 is not supported by the originally filed specification or claims. Appropriate correction is required. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAN MING R HUI whose telephone number is (571)272-0626. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kortney Klinkel can be reached at 571-270-5239. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAN MING R HUI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 24, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 08, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 23, 2024
Interview Requested
Nov 04, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 14, 2024
Notice of Allowance
Nov 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 09, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 27, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594237
Mucoadhesive Gel Composition
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589081
CURCUMIN COMPOSITIONS FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS AND JOINT WELLNESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576045
METHODS AND NUTRACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR THE PREVENTION AND/OR MITIGATION OF VEISALGIA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569465
METHOD FOR ACTIVATING FOLLICLES BY MEANS OF USING SMALL-MOLECULE COMPOUND, AND PREPARATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564581
PYRAZOLE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+19.7%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1284 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month