Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/433,180

METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR COOLING A SEAT OF A VEHICLE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner
CURRY, CINDI M
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
173 granted / 206 resolved
+32.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
223
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 206 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 9 and 16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 3-9, 11-18 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20190351742 A1 Fujii; Toshiharu in view of US 20150091340 A1 Hulway; Michael. Regarding claim 1, Fujii taches, a seat cooling system for a vehicle, comprising: an HVAC device (fig. 2, element 10) configured to direct conditioned air into a cabin of the vehicle (fig. 1); a seat coupled to a floor of the vehicle (element 5) and having: a seating surface (element 6) that is perforated such that air can flow through the seating surface (element 42), and a base below the seating surface (fig. 1); a fan coupled to the base and configured to pull air through the seating surface in an inward flow direction and to push air through the seating surface in an outward flow direction (element 44); a temperature sensor configured to detect an internal temperature of the vehicle (fig. 2, element 52); and an electronic control unit (ECU) electrically connected to the HVAC device (fig. 2, element 50), the fan, and the temperature sensor and configured to: control the HVAC device to direct a first flow of conditioned air and a second flow of conditioned air (element 42 and 43) into the cabin, but fails to teach, control the fan to operate in a first blower direction to pull at least a portion of the first flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the inward flow direction, and control the fan to operate in a second blower direction opposite the first blower direction to push at least a portion of the second flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the outward flow direction when the internal temperature of the vehicle is less than a first temperature threshold. However Hulway teaches, control the fan to operate in a first blower direction to pull at least a portion of the first flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the inward flow direction (fig. 4B), and control the fan to operate in a second blower direction opposite the first blower direction to push at least a portion of the second flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the outward flow direction (fig. 4A) when the internal temperature of the vehicle is less than a first temperature threshold (para 0025). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the fan taught by Fujii with the fan taught by Hulway with a reasonable expectation of success. The motivation to combine is to control temperature of occupant. Regarding claim 3, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 1, further comprising a user interface coupled to the dashboard of the vehicle and configured to receive a user input (element 56), wherein the controlling the HVAC device and/or the controlling the fan to pull at least the portion of the first flow of conditioned air is performed based on the user input (para 0095). Regarding claim 4, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 1, wherein: the temperature sensor is coupled to the seat, and the internal temperature of the vehicle is a temperature of the seat (fig. 2). Regarding claim 5, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 1, further comprising: a user interface (element 56)coupled to the dashboard of the vehicle and configured to receive a user input (para 0094), wherein: the controlling the fan to pull at least the portion of the first flow of conditioned air is performed when the internal temperature of the vehicle is greater than a second temperature threshold; and the user input includes the first temperature threshold and/or the second temperature threshold (para 0095 “temperature setting switch”). Regarding claim 6, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 1, further comprising one or more front air vents coupled to a dashboard and/or a ceiling of the vehicle, wherein the first flow of conditioned air is directed into the cabin through the one or more front air vents and toward the seat (element 31). Regarding claim 7, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 6, further comprising one or more rear air vents coupled to the floor of the vehicle and/or the base of the seat, wherein the second flow of conditioned air is directed into the cabin through the one or more rear air vents and toward a bottom and/or a back of the seat (element 43 and 47). Regarding claim 8, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 7, further comprising: a front air duct configured to carry conditioned air from the HVAC device to the one or more front air vents (element5 31), and a rear air duct configured to carry conditioned air from the HVAC device to the one or more rear air vents (element 42). Regarding claim 9, Fujii teaches, a seat cooling system for a vehicle, comprising: an HVAC device (fig. 1, element 10) configured to direct conditioned air into a cabin of the vehicle (element 31); a seat coupled to a floor of the vehicle (element 5) and having: a seating surface (element 6) that is perforated such that air can flow through the seating surface (element 42), and a base below the seating surface (fig. 1); a fan coupled to the base and configured to pull air through the seating surface in an inward flow direction and to push air through the seating surface in an outward flow direction (element 44); a temperature sensor configured to detect an internal temperature of the vehicle (fig. 2, element 52); and an electronic control unit (ECU) electrically connected to the HVAC device (element 50), the fan, and the temperature sensor and configured to: control the HVAC device to direct a first flow of conditioned air through a front air vent of the vehicle and toward the seat (fig. 1) and a second flow of conditioned air through a rear air vent of the vehicle and toward a bottom of the seat (element 43), But fails to teach, control the fan to operate in a first blower direction to pull at least a portion of the first flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the inward flow direction when the internal temperature of the vehicle is greater than a first temperature threshold, and control the fan to operate in a second blower direction opposite the first blower direction to push at least a portion of the second flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the outward flow direction when the internal temperature of the vehicle is less than a second temperature threshold. However, Hulway teaches, control the fan to operate in a first blower direction to pull at least a portion of the first flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the inward flow direction (fig. 4B) when the internal temperature of the vehicle is greater than a first temperature threshold and control the fan to operate in a second blower direction opposite the first blower direction to push at least a portion of the second flow of conditioned air through the seating surface in the outward flow direction (fig. 4A) when the internal temperature of the vehicle is less than a second temperature threshold (para 0024-0025 “may be controlled automatically by a temperature sensor”). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the fan taught by Fujii with the fan taught by Hulway with a reasonable expectation of success. The motivation to combine is to control temperature of occupant. Regarding claim 11, Fujii as modifies teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 9, wherein the first temperature threshold and/or the second temperature threshold are selected by an occupant through a user interface of the vehicle (para 0095 “temperature setting switch). Regarding claim 12, Fujii as modifies teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 9, wherein the fan is positioned at least partially within a lower half of the seat (element 44). Regarding claim 13, Fujii as modifies teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 9, further comprising one or more air ducts configured to carry the first flow of conditioned air from the HVAC device to the front air vent (element 31) and the second flow of conditioned air from the HVAC device to the rear air vent (element 32). Regarding claim 14, Fujii as modifies teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 9, wherein the front air vent is positioned forward and/or above the seat and the rear air vent is positioned rearward and/or below the seat (fig. 1). Regarding claim 15, Fujii as modifies teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 9, wherein the first flow of conditioned air is directed through the front air vent before the second flow of conditioned air is directed through the rear air vent (fig. 4, CA arrows). Regarding claim 16 Fujii teaches, a seat cooling system for a vehicle, comprising: an HVAC device configured to direct conditioned air into a cabin of the vehicle (fig. 1, element 10); a plurality of seats coupled to a floor of the vehicle and each having: a seating surface (element 6) that is perforated such that air can flow through the seating surface (element 42), and a base below the seating surface (fig. 1); one or more fans coupled to the base of each seat of the plurality of seats and configured to pull air through the seating surface of each seat of the plurality of seats in an inward flow direction and to push air through the seating surface of each seat of the plurality of seats in an outward flow direction (element 44); one or more temperature sensors configured to detect an internal temperature of the vehicle (element 52); and an electronic control unit (ECU) electrically connected to the HVAC device (element 50), the one or more fans, and the one or more temperature sensors (fig. 2) and configured to: control the HVAC device to direct one or more first flows of conditioned air through one or more front air vents of the vehicle (element 31) and toward a quantity of seats of the plurality of seats and one or more second flows of conditioned air through one or more rear air vents of the vehicle and toward a bottom of the quantity of seats (element 43), but fails to teach, plurality of seats and control the one or more fans to operate in a first blower direction to pull at least a portion of the one or more first flows of conditioned air through the seating surface of each of the quantity of seats in the inward flow direction when the internal temperature of the vehicle is greater than a first temperature threshold, and control the one or more fans to operate in a second blower direction opposite the first blower direction to push at least a portion of the one or more second flows of conditioned air through the seating surface of each of the quantity of seats in the outward flow direction when the internal temperature of the vehicle is less than a second temperature threshold. Fujii discloses the claimed invention except for plurality of seats. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have a plurality, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378. Hulway teaches, control the one or more fans to operate in a first blower direction to pull at least a portion of the one or more first flows of conditioned air through the seating surface of each of the quantity of seats in the inward flow direction (fig. 4B) when the internal temperature of the vehicle is greater than a first temperature threshold, and control the one or more fans to operate in a second blower direction opposite the first blower direction to push at least a portion of the one or more second flows of conditioned air through the seating surface of each of the quantity of seats in the outward flow direction (fig. 4A) when the internal temperature of the vehicle is less than a second temperature threshold (para 0024-0025). Regarding claim 17, Fujii teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 16, wherein at least one of the one or more front air vents is positioned forward of each of the plurality of seats (fig. 1). Regarding claim 18, Fujii teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 17, wherein at least one of the one or more rear air vents is positioned rearward and/or below each of the plurality of seats (elements 43 and 48). Regarding claim 20, Fujii teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 16, wherein: the one or more temperature sensors are coupled to each of the plurality of seats (fig. 2), and the internal temperature of the vehicle is a temperature of the plurality of seats (element 52). Claim(s) 2, 10 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujii as applied to claims above, and further in view of US 20230191871 A1 Feltham; Graham Lloyd et al.. Regarding claim 2, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 1, but fails to teach, wherein: the ECU is further configured to receive a user input from a mobile device in communication with the ECU, and the controlling the HVAC device and/or the controlling the fan to pull at least the portion of the first flow of conditioned air is performed based on the user input. However, Feltham teaches, wherein: the ECU is further configured to receive a user input from a mobile device (fig. 1, element 154) in communication with the ECU (element 102), and the controlling the HVAC device and/or the controlling the fan to pull at least the portion of the first flow of conditioned air is performed based on the user input (fig. 1). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the seat cooling system taught by Fujii with the mobile device taught by Feltham with a reasonable expectation of success because “user device 154 may be configured to implement a mobile application (e.g., provided by and/or associated with a manufacturer of vehicle 101) that allows a user to access a user profile and specify certain settings or preferences of the user profile, e.g., preferred HVAC settings, preferred thermal settings for a vehicle component (e.g., a ventilated seat or steering wheel, other any other suitable component to which thermal energy may be directed) or any other suitable settings, or any combination thereof.” (para 0022). Regarding claim 10, Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 9, but is silent on, further comprising an occupant sensor configured to detect an occupant sitting in the seat, wherein the controlling the HVAC device is performed in response to the occupant sensor detecting the occupant sitting in the seat. However Feltham teaches, further comprising an occupant sensor configured to detect an occupant sitting in the seat (fig. 1, element 134), wherein the controlling the HVAC device is performed in response to the occupant sensor detecting the occupant sitting in the seat (para 0052, “HVAC settings to be applied in the event the occupant is determined to exit seat 124 or seat 124 is otherwise unoccupied”). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the seat cooling system taught by Fujii with the sensor taught by Feltham with a reasonable expectation of success “to monitor actions of the user and a location of the user within vehicle” (para 0052). Regarding claim 19 Fujii, as modified teaches, the seat cooling system of claim 16, but fails to teach, further comprising one or more occupant sensors coupled to each of the plurality of seats and configured to detect whether an occupant is sitting in a respective seat of the plurality of seats, wherein the quantity of seats is equal to the number of detected sitting occupants. However Feltham teaches, further comprising one or more occupant sensors coupled to each of the plurality of seats and configured to detect whether an occupant is sitting in a respective seat of the plurality of seats (fig. 1, element 134), wherein the quantity of seats is equal to the number of detected sitting occupants. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the seat cooling system taught by Fujii with the sensor taught by Feltham with a reasonable expectation of success “to monitor actions of the user and a location of the user within vehicle” (para 0052). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CINDI M. CURRY whose telephone number is (469)295-9296. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-4:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua J. Michener can be reached at 571-272-1467. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.M.C/ Examiner Art Unit 3642 /JOSHUA J MICHENER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 07, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 07, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 13, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 14, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601354
Patio Chair Fan Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582236
VARIABLE TEMPERATURE LAWN CHAIR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576971
PASSENGER SUITE WITH SECONDARY SEAT AND AMENITIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565315
AIRCRAFT BEVERAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12565129
Heating Device for Vehicle Seats, and Method for Operating Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 206 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month