Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/433,828

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING LOW MOBILITY STATE, TERMINAL, AND NETWORK-SIDE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Examiner
AKINYEMI, AJIBOLA A
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
746 granted / 931 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
956
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 931 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-3, 6-10, 13-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abe (Pub. No.: US 2013/0077518 A1) and further in view of Santhanam (Pub. No.: US 2022/0174522 A1). With respect to claim 1: Abe discloses a method for determining a low mobility state, comprising: in a case that a terminal is configured with multiple serving cells (fig. 2, with UE representing terminal configured with eNode 1-2), obtaining, by the terminal, a measurement result of a first serving cell (abstract and parag. 0004), wherein the first serving cell is one of the multiple serving cells (fig. 2 with eNode 1-3 representing multiple serving cells); and determining, by the terminal based on the measurement result, whether the terminal is in a low mobility state (parag. 0031-0035). Abe discloses user terminal with eNode 1-3 but did not explicitly mention the word serving cell). Santhanam discloses serving cell in (fig. 2, item 205-a, 205-b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Santhanam into the teaching of Abe in order to save power. With respect to claims 2, 16: Santhanam discloses the method for determining a low mobility state according to claim 1, wherein the first serving cell is determined by the terminal based on a configuration manner of low mobility state determining criterion sent by a network-side device. (Abstract and parag. 0102). With respect to claims 3, 10, 17, 19: Santhanam discloses the method for determining a low mobility state according to claim 2, wherein in a case that the configuration manner of low mobility state determining criterion is terminal-based, in presence of a new radio (NR) primary cell (PCell), the first serving cell is the NR PCell; or in absence of an NR PCell, the first serving cell is the first primary secondary cell (PSCell) configured by the network-side device (parag. 0005, 0092 and 0138). With respect to claim 6: Santhanam discloses the method for determining a low mobility state according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: in a case that when in an idle state, the terminal has determined that the terminal is in a low mobility state, upon entering a connected state, reporting to a network-side device that the terminal is in a low mobility state (parag, 0005 and 0161). With respect to claims 7, 14: Santhanam discloses the method for determining a low mobility state according to claim 1, wherein the determining, by the terminal based on the measurement result, whether the terminal is in a low mobility state comprises: determining that the terminal is in a low mobility state in a case that a measurement result of at least one reference signal of the first serving cell satisfies a low mobility state determining criterion; determining that the terminal is in a low mobility state in a case that measurement results of all reference signals of the first serving cell satisfy a low mobility state determining criterion; (parag. 0005, 0016-0017). With respect to claim 8: Santhanam discloses the method for determining a low mobility state according to claim 7, wherein the low mobility state determining criterion is a difference between a measurement reference value and the measurement result being less than or equal to a target threshold, wherein the measurement reference value is obtained based on a cell measurement result of the terminal in a connected state or a measurement reference value of the terminal in an idle state (parag. 0020 and 0039). With respect to claim 9: Abe discloses a method for determining a low mobility state, comprising: configuring, by a network-side device, a low mobility state determining criterion for a terminal (parag. 0032-0033); and receiving, by the network-side device, first indication information from the terminal, wherein the first indication information is used to indicate whether the terminal is in a low mobility state (abstract and parag. 0004), the low mobility state is determined by the terminal based on a measurement result of a first cell and low mobility serving criterion and a first cell is one of multiple serving cells configured for the terminal (parag. 0031-0035). Abe discloses user terminal with eNode 1-3 but did not explicitly mention the word serving cell). Santhanam discloses serving cell in (fig. 2, item 205-a, 205-b). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to utilize the teaching of Santhanam into the teaching of Abe in order to save power. With respect to claim 13: Santhanam disclose the method for determining a low mobility state according to claim 9, wherein the method further comprises: receiving, by the network-side device, second indication information from the terminal, wherein the second indication information is sent by the terminal upon entering a connected state and used to indicate that the terminal is in a low mobility state, and the low mobility state is determined by the terminal in an idle state (parag. 0005, 0092 and 0135). With respect to claim 15: The rejection of claim 1 is incorporated. Santhanam further disclose a terminal, comprising a processor (fig. 11, item 1140) a memory (fig. 11, item 1130), and a program or instructions stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor (fig. 11, item 1140 which is the processor and memory 1130 as in parag. 0301). With respect to claim 18: The rejection of claim 9 is incorporated; Santhanam further disclose a network-side device, comprising a processor, a memory, and a program or instructions stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor (fig. 11 with processor 1140 and memory 1130). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 11, 12, 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AJIBOLA A AKINYEMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1846. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-5:00pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, YUWEN PAN can be reached at (571)-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AJIBOLA A AKINYEMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597961
CIRCUIT REDUNDANCY AND WEAR BALANCING TO IMPROVE CIRCUIT LIFETIME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587876
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF NETWORK EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587137
Receiver Circuit
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586924
Antenna System Architecture with Calibration Feedback Routing for Per Element Calibration with Digital Beamformer
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587224
RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNAL SPLITTING WITH DIFFERENTIAL FILTER AND LOW NOISE AMPLIFIERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 931 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month