Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/434,055

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSFORMING RECORDED COMMUNICATION DATA

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Examiner
PATEL, JAY P
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Dspace GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
777 granted / 920 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Multiple hyperlinks exist in the specification; For example, paragraphs 15 and 54. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claim is potentially directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim is system claims that does not define any structure. Under broadest reasonable interpretation, the claim can include non-tangible or transitory subject matter such as a computer program. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential structural cooperative relationships of elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the necessary structural connections. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted structural cooperative relationships are: Claim 13 is a system claim that lacks any recitation of any structural elements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 and 14 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: In regards to the claims, carrying recorded communication data on a basis of a first communication matrix, where the data is sent via test system of an ECU under; where the test system is being connected via a first communication link to the ECU under test that is configured based on a second communication matrix. In addition, the cited prior art fails to teach, reading and comparing elements of the communication matrices, determining the data to be transformed and processing and sending the data as claimed. Prior art Kwak et al. (US Publication 2023/0161931 A1) teaches with respect to figures 1 and 2, a simulation device 100 that includes a hardware in the A loop simulation (HILS) module 110 configured to perform a simulation using a physical electronic control unit (ECU), a storage 120 configured to store software in the loop simulation (SILS) software for performing a simulation using various types of information required for a simulation and a virtual ECU, an inputter 130 configured to receive a user input, a controller 140 configured to control a simulation using at least one of the HILS module 110 or the SILS software 125, a communication interface 150 configured to perform communication between the HILS module 110 and the SILS software 125, a signal generator 160 configured to provide an electrical signal to the HILS module 110, and a display 170 configured to display a result of the simulation (see paragraph 50). Prior art Mizoguchi et al. (US Publication 2022/0058113 A1) teaches, with respect to figure 1, a configuration of a system including a test environment determination device 0 in this embodiment. The system as illustrated includes a test environment determination device 0, three hardware-in-the-loop simulator (HiLS) environments 1, and two software-in-the-loop simulator (SiLS) environments 2. Each of the HiLS environments 1 is connected to the test environment determination device 0, and each of the SiLS environments 2 is connected to the test environment determination device 0. In addition, each of the HiLS environments 1 is connected to an ECU 3 (see paragraph 29). Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY P PATEL whose telephone number is (571)272-3086. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY P PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598591
COMMUNICATION RESOURCE SCHEDULING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593244
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RADIO RESOURCE DETERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587951
PROVISIONING HEADLESS WIFI DEVICES AND RELATED SYSTEMS, METHODS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581418
TERMINAL DEVICE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574273
CONFIGURATION OF TYPE INFORMATION FOR APPDU IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.4%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month