Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/434,196

CONNECTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Examiner
LE, THANH TAM T
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1221 granted / 1413 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1449
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§102
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1413 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 11, “the housing over the entire periphery of the housing” are confusing. How is the housing can be over the periphery of the housing? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ogawa (6,702,593) in view of Uki (12,009,623) and Tamura et al. (9,013,889). Regarding claim 1, Ogawa discloses a connector device comprising: a housing (30, Fig. 4); a casing (11 and 12, Fig. 4) that holds the housing (Fig. 5); and an elastic seal member (45, Fig. 5) that is fitted to the housing, wherein the housing has, on an outer peripheral surface of the housing, a holding groove (49, Fig. 1) that receives the elastic seal member, the casing includes a first casing (11, Fig. 1) and a second casing (12) that are combined with each other with the housing interposed between the first casing and the second casing at a position corresponding to the holding groove, the elastic seal member is annular and encloses, when arranged in the holding groove. Ogawa discloses the claimed invention as described above except for the elastic seal member being arranged between the first casing and the second casing; and a filling seal part provided to fill up any gap between the first casing and the second casing. Uki discloses a seal member (51, Fig. 3) is arranged on a hole (Ca1, Fig. 1) of (Ca3). It would have been obvious to provide Owage to have the seal member (the sealing member will be arranged in a hole (18, Fig. 4 of Ogawa) of (11A); and the seal member will be located between the first casing (11, Fig. 5) and the second casing (12)), a taught by Uki for better holding the connector into the case. Tamura et al., Fig. 1 show a filling seal part (20) provided to fill up any gap between the first casing (4) and the second casing (1). It would have been obvious to modify Ogawa to have a filling seal part provided to fill up any gap between the first casing and the second casing, as taught by Tamura et al., in order to provide a high possibility of air leakage from an area in which a joint is to be established (Tamura et al., column 2, lines 16-24). Regarding claim 2, the combination of Ogawa and Tamura et al. disclose the housing is not in contact with the filling seal part. Regarding claim 3, the combination of Ogawa and Tamura et al. disclose the elastic seal member has an elastic contact region that is in contact with the casing, and the filling seal part has a filling contact region that is in contact with the casing at a position other than a position at which the elastic seal member is in contact with the casing. Regarding claim 5, it is noted that Tamura et al., Fig. 3 shows the elastic seal member (51) has a projection that projects in a seal width direction, which intersects with a peripheral direction of the elastic seal member, and the housing (24) has a recess that is recessed in the seal width direction and receives the projection in a fitted state. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 4 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH TAM T LE whose telephone number is (571)272-2094. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdul Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THANH TAM T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 03/10/26. thanh-tam.le@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603460
QUICK RELEASE SAFETY ASSEMBLY FOR AIR AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597748
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597749
REPLACEABLE LOW VOLTAGE CONNECTOR ADAPTER WITH INTEGRATED FUSE DESIGN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592737
DOCKING SLEEVE WITH ELECTRICAL ADAPTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567696
Connector Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.8%)
1y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1413 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month