Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/434,203

ON-DEMAND PAGING ACQUISITION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Examiner
SHARMA, GAUTAM
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
DELL PRODUCTS, L.P.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
558 granted / 636 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
658
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.0%
+16.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 636 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-3, 8, 11-13 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dong et al, application no. 2024/0121755, hereinafter known as Dong in view of Bolle et al, application no. 2019/0082417, hereinafter known as Bolle. As to claim 1, Dong discloses a method, comprising: receiving, by a user equipment comprising at least one processor from a radio network node, a paging assignment configuration, comprising at least one paging identifier indictive of at least one paging associated with the user equipment (Dong, [0034]-[0036], paging occasion identifier for subgroup of UE’s assigned by network node used to communicate with UE’s); receiving, by the user equipment from the radio network node, a paging configuration comprising paging resource monitoring information, corresponding to the at least one paging associated with the user equipment, usable by the user equipment to monitor at least one paging resource during at least one modified paging policy period (Dong, figure 6, step 604, [0043]-[0048], UE receiving form network subgroup assignment for paging occasion information, step 606, for UE to monitor the paging occasion; figure 5, paging cycle or paging policy period; [0029], dynamically configured paging occasion time and frequency resources); determining, by the user equipment, that the radio network node is implementing a modified paging policy with respect to the at least one paging associated with the user equipment to result in a determined modified paging policy (Dong, figure 6, steps 604, 606, paging occasion information shared by UE for UE to enable and use the paging occasion); and responsive to determining the determined modified paging policy, monitoring at least one paging resource with respect to the at least one paging (Dong, figure 6, step 606, UE monitors paging as determined by network). Dong discloses paging subgroup based on plural information including subgroup ID, UE ID (Dong, [0034]-[0040]). Dong does not disclose however Bolle discloses paging class configuration (Bolle, [0023]-[0029], selecting paging policy based on QoS information). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Dong to include the limitations of paging class configuration as taught by Bolle. Class of Service or Quality of Service requirements are used in the art to differentiate network traffic that require different metrics of communications such delay sensitive traffic or best effort. As to claim 2, Dong discloses wherein the paging resource monitoring information, corresponding to the at least one paging occasion, is usable by the user equipment to monitor paging resources with respect to the radio network node during the at least one modified paging policy period (Dong, figure 5 and 6, assigning paging occasion resources for paging cycle; [0029], dynamically configured paging occasion time and frequency resources), and wherein the paging resource monitoring information comprises at least one of: at least one paging occasion frequency resource and at least one paging timing resource associated with the at least one paging occasion frequency resource (Dong, figure 5, paging cycle with paging occasions as determined for UE by network, [0029], dynamically configured paging occasion time and frequency resources), at least one device class identifier indicative of at least one device classification with respect to which paging messages are able to be broadcast via the at least one paging occasion frequency resource and the at least one paging timing resource, at least one service class identifier indicative of at least one service level classification with respect to which the paging messages are able to be broadcast via the at least one paging occasion frequency resource and the at least one paging timing resource, at least one subscription level identifier indicative of at least one subscription level classification with respect to which the paging messages are able to be broadcast via the at least one paging occasion frequency resource and the at least one paging timing resource, or a periodicity associated with the at least one paging occasion frequency resource or the at least one paging timing resource. Dong does not disclose however Bolle discloses paging class configuration (Bolle, [0023]-[0029], selecting paging policy based on QoS information). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Dong to include the limitations of paging class configuration as taught by Bolle. Class of Service or Quality of Service requirements are used in the art to differentiate network traffic that require different metrics of communications such delay sensitive traffic or best effort. As to claim 3, Dong discloses wherein the determining of the determined modified paging policy comprises: receiving, from the radio network node, a paging interruption indication indicative that the radio network node is implementing the modified paging policy with respect to the user equipment, wherein the modified paging policy comprises deactivating paging with respect to the at least one paging class (Dong, figure 4, 5, [0030]-[0033], UE operating in known technique of monitoring paging occasion where the UE is waking up often to receive plural paging message; figure 6, [0043], network determine UE Information and provides a modified method of monitoring paging occasions to UE that changes how often UE has to monitor for paging occasions). As to claim 8, Dong and Bolle disclose the method of claim 1. Dong does not disclose however Bolle discloses wherein the user equipment is associated with the at least one paging class based on at least one of: a capability corresponding to the user equipment, a services subscription level corresponding to the user equipment, a first quality-of-service associated with the user equipment, or a second quality-of-service associated with the capability corresponding to the user equipment (Bolle, [0023]-[0029], selecting paging policy based on QoS information). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Dong to include the limitations of wherein the user equipment is associated with the at least one paging class based on at least one of: a capability corresponding to the user equipment, a services subscription level corresponding to the user equipment, a first quality-of-service associated with the user equipment, or a second quality-of-service associated with the capability corresponding to the user equipment as taught by Bolle. Class of Service or Quality of Service requirements are used in the art to differentiate network traffic that require different metrics of communications such delay sensitive traffic or best effort. As to claims 11 and 13, the claims are rejected as applied to claims 1 and 3 respectively above by Dong in view of Bolle. As to claim 12, Dong disclose wherein the at least one paging resource corresponds to the radio network node (Dong, Figure 6, step 602, paging resources sent by network node 610). As to claim 17, the claim is rejected as applied to claim 1 above by Dong in view of Bolle. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7, 9, 10, 14-16, 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GAUTAM SHARMA whose telephone number is (571)270-7182. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached at 571-272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GAUTAM SHARMA/ Examiner, Art Unit 2467 /MICHAEL J MOORE JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604286
DISTRIBUTED EVENT-BASED COORDINATION MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604305
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK DATA AND CONTROL INFORMATION AND APPARATUS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604306
METHOD, SYSTEM AND USER EQUIPMENT FOR SCEDULING REQUEST TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598668
SURVIVAL TIME STATE TRIGGERING AND FALLBACK FOR DUPLICATION WITH DUAL-CONNECTIVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593278
PROCEDURES AND MECHANISMS FOR NARROWBAND MULTI-CHANNEL TRANSMISSION FOR WAKE UP RADIOS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 636 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month