Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/434,668

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Priority
Aug 20, 2021 — continuation of PCTCN2021113842
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 634 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-8, 9-10, 12-15, 16-17, 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wilhelmsson et al. (hereinafter Wilhelmsson0(US 2015/0009897) in view of Marinier et al. (hereinafter Marinier)(US 2016/0183276). Regarding claim 1, Wilhelmsson teaches a method for wireless communication, comprising: determining, by a terminal device, a target Transport Block Size (TBS) of a transport block to be sent according to first information(items 1010(receive control data), 1020(determine the value of feedback time which is based on size of transport block; also P[0091-0093]) which is in fig. 10; P[0057], size of transport block to be transmitted), wherein the first information is associated with acquiring energy by the terminal device through power harvesting, and the energy is used by the terminal device for communication(P[0064], energy harvesting by the terminal device). Wilhelmsson did not teach specifically a terminal device according to first information, a target Transport Block Size (TBS) of a transport block to be sent according to first information, a target Transport Block Size (TBS) of a transport block to be sent by the terminal device(0277] The WTRU may be configured to select an available transport block to correspond with an available transport block size allowed by a configuration set, power limitations (e.g., based on available power and range predetermined for the given service), bandwidth limitations (e.g., depending on the allowed bandwidth the WTRU may select) and/or a selected pattern). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have the a terminal device according to first information, a target Transport Block Size (TBS) of a transport block to be sent Regarding claim 2, Wilhelmsson teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the first information comprises at least one of: energy storage state information of the terminal device; energy storage capability information of the terminal device; power consumption information of the terminal device; information about communication duration supported by the terminal device; or strength information of a power supplying signal of the terminal device(P[0064], amount of energy harvesting can provide in a given period of tme; P[0073], capability information). Regarding claim 4, Wilhelmsson in view of Marinier teaches the method of claim 1, wherein determining, by the terminal device according to the first information, the target TBS of the transport block to be sent comprises: determining, by the terminal device, the target TBS according to the first information and resource configuration information for an uplink transmission(P[0050], feedback time is determined depending on how much of the processing resources are available for processing of transport block reception). Regarding claim 5, Wilhelmsson teaches the method of claim 4, wherein the resource configuration information for the uplink transmission comprises at least one of: transmission resource information for the uplink transmission, a modulation mode for the uplink transmission, a data rate for the uplink transmission, or a coding mode for the uplink transmission(P[0063], time needed to decode signals). Regarding claim 6, Wilhelmsson teaches the method of claim 5, wherein the transmission resource information for the uplink transmission comprises time-domain resource information for the uplink transmission, and the method further comprises: determining target duration information for calculating the target TBS according to a transmission duration corresponding to the time-domain resource information for the uplink transmission and information about communication duration supported by the terminal device in the first information. Regarding claim 7, Wilhelmsson teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: sending, by the terminal device, the first information to the network device(item 1030 in fig. 10; also P[0094], transmitter*base station) may send the control data to the receiver(terminal); also claim 39). Regarding claim 8, Wilhelmsson teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: sending, by the terminal device, first indication information to the network device, wherein the first indication information is used for indicating the target TBS(items 1030 and 1040 in Fig. 10; P[0094], indicated value of feedback time; P[0095], controls the size of the data block on the basis of determined value of feedback time). Claims 9-10, 12-15 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1-2, 4-6, 8 respectively, Claims 16-17, 19-20 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1-2, 4-5 respectively, Claim(s) 3, 11, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (Wilhelmsson et al. (hereinafter Wilhelmsson0(US 2015/0009897) in view of Marinier et al. (hereinafter Marinier)(US 2016/0183276) and Reynolds et al. (hereinafter Reynolds)(US 2016/0365890). Regarding claim 3, WIlhemsson teaches the method, wherein the information about communication duration supported by the terminal device communication duration currently supported by the terminal device, or a maximum communication duration supported by the terminal device(P[0032], different sizes of data blocks can be supported; vary between different terminal devices; P[0066], maximum block size for each supported value of the feedback time). Wilhemsson in view of Marinier did not teach specifically backscatter. However, Reynolds teaches in an analogous art backscatter. (P[0032], P[0044], P[0080], backscatter device may produce backscatter signal). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use the backscatter in order to have wider applicability. Claims 11 and 18 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 3. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706662
ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT FOR MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701622
Connection Resume Request Method and Apparatus
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695820
SMARTPHONE CASE WITH REAR-FACING VIEWFINDER DISPLAY
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12634970
TECHNIQUES FOR CONFIGURING REFERENCE SIGNAL PATTERNS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
8y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634865
REPORTING MEASUREMENT DISTRIBUTION FOR POSITIONING
4y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 7m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month