Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/434,681

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING HEALTH EVENTS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Priority
Jun 30, 2023 — provisional 63/511,579
Examiner
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
768 granted / 947 resolved
+11.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1003
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 947 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment, filed 08 May 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 – 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102/103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of 35 U.S.C. § 101. A new ground of rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is presented herein. The claims have not been amended. Under MPEP 706.07(a), this is a new ground that was necessitated by amendment or information submitted by Applicant. Therefore, the action is non-final. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) a system (claim 1) and non-transitory computer readable medium (claim 11) comprising: one or more sensors; one or more input devices; one or more output devices; memory; and one or more processors configured to: sense physiological data; in accordance with a calculation based on the physiological data and the current location indicating that a likelihood of the user of the system experiencing a health event is above a threshold value; outputting a request for user feedback, receiving the user feedback, updating the calculation for future sue based on the user feedback. Step 1 Claim 1 is drawn to a system with sensors, input/out devices, and processors. This is a machine. Claim 11 is a manufacture. Step 2A, Prong One The claims recite a judicial exception: a mental process and a mathematical concept. Calculating a likelihood that a health event is above a threshold, requesting confirmation of the event, and updating the calculation based on the confirmation can be performed in the human mind, or with a pen and paper, or as a mathematical evaluation of data. A clinician reviewing wearable data, location, and a risk score would be able to adjust the scoring rule based on feedback in the same way. The sensors, input and output devices, and processors are extra-solution data gathering and generic computer implementation. Step 2A, Prong Two The judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. The additional elements are: one or more sensors, one or more input devices, one or more output devices, and one or more processors. These elements are recited at a high level of generality. The sensors are not limited to any particular sensor, arrangement, or measurement technique. The claims are merely data gathering and generic computer implementation. Step 2B The claims are drawn to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claims are merely data gathering and generic computer implementation. Claims 2 – 10 and 12 – 20 do not cure the deficiencies of the independent claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH M DIETRICH whose telephone number is (571)270-1895. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer McDonald can be reached at 571-270-3061. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH M DIETRICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §101
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
May 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 08, 2026
Response Filed
May 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12758774
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GLUCOSE REGULATION
6y 2m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751826
SMART IMPLANTS FOR PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12728267
AUTOMATING BOLUS STIMULATION THERAPY FROM LEARNED USAGE
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728260
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NERVE CONDUCTION BLOCK
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714856
IMPLANTABLE ELECTRICAL STIMULATION (IES) SYSTEM AND A METHOD THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+8.8%)
3y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 947 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month