Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/434,750

HIGH-VOLTAGE ENERGY STORAGE QUICK CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 06, 2024
Examiner
JIMENEZ, OSCAR C
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Li Yang Electric Machinery (Dongguan) Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
622 granted / 714 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hoshino (US 4,674,814). Regarding claim 1: Hoshino teaches a quick connector (Fig. 1), comprising a socket 12 and a plug 11, the socket 12 comprising a hanging platform (at 25, 26, 43; Fig. 1) in a convex annular structure or a groove structure located on an outer circumference thereof (see Fig. 1), an annular slot (at 14; Fig. 1) defined on an inner side of the plug 11 (see Fig. 1), the socket 12 and the hanging platform inserted in the annular slot of the plug 11 (see Figs. 2-4), the plug 11 comprising an elastic hook 42 in a cantilever structure (see at 42; Fig. 1) located on a side wall of the annular slot (see Figs. 1-2), the cantilever structure of the elastic hook extending axially along the plug under a free state (see Fig. 1), a hook (e.g. distal end of cantilever 42; see Fig. 1) on an free end of the elastic hook 42 engaged with a stepped surface 43 of the hanging platform opposite to the plug (see Fig. 2); wherein the plug 11 comprises an operating handle 32 disposed along an elastic deformation direction of the elastic hook 42 (see Figs. 1-3), and the operating handle 32 is connected to the plug 11 by a locking manner in the elastic deformation direction of the elastic hook 42 (see Fig. 3 and Col. 5, lines 3-12). Claims 1-3, 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Saba (US 6,024,595). Regarding claim 1: Saba teaches a quick connector (Fig. 1), comprising a socket M1 and a plug F1, the socket M1 comprising a hanging platform (at 13; Fig. 1) in a convex annular structure or a groove structure located on an outer circumference thereof (see Fig. 1), an annular slot (at 10; Fig. 1) defined on an inner side of the plug F1 (see Fig. 1), the socket M1 and the hanging platform inserted in the annular slot of the plug F1 (see Figs. 4-5), the plug F1 comprising an elastic hook 8 in a cantilever structure (see at 8; Fig. 1) located on a side wall of the annular slot (see Fig. 1), the cantilever structure of the elastic hook 8 extending axially along the plug under a free state (see Fig. 1), a hook 12 (Fig. 1) on an free end of the elastic hook 8 engaged with a stepped surface 13 of the hanging platform opposite to the plug (see Figs. 4-5); wherein the plug F1 comprises an operating handle 15 disposed along an elastic deformation direction of the elastic hook 8 (see Figs. 1-5), and the operating handle 15 is connected to the plug F1 by a locking manner in the elastic deformation direction of the elastic hook 8 (see Figs. 4-5 and Col. 6, lines 14-30). Regarding claim 2: Saba teaches all the limitations of claim 1 and further teaches wherein the operating handle 15 is slidably and distance-adjustably mounted on the cantilever structure and along an extension direction of the cantilever structure of the elastic hook 12 (see Figs. 4-5), the plug F1 comprises a handle positioning block 25, 27 disposed protrusively and radially on an outer circumferential wall thereof (see Figs. 1 and 3), the handle positioning block comprises a limiting slot (at 28; Fig. 1) extended along an axial direction of the plug F1, and one end of the operating handle 15 is inserted in the limiting slot along a sliding direction thereof (see Fig. 5). Regarding claim 3: Saba teaches all the limitations of claim 2 and further teaches wherein a first bump 18 is disposed on a side wall of one end of the operating handle 15 along a slide direction of the operating handle 15 (see Fig. 1), a second bump 28 is disposed on a side wall of the limiting slot, and the second bump interferences with the first bump in a direction of relative sliding (see Fig. 5). Regarding claim 9: Saba teaches all the limitations of claim 2 and further teaches wherein the cantilever structure of the elastic hook 8 is a bent structure (at 12a; Fig. 1) with a free end tilted toward the annular slot (see Fig. 1); the free end of the cantilever structure of the elastic hook 8 comprises a reinforcing rib structure (e.g. let and right of 22; Fig. 3) on a side wall opposite to the annular slot (Fig. 3); the handle positioning block 25, 27 further comprises an anti-off boss (at 25; Fig. 3); a setting gap 21 is defined between reinforcing ribs located at an end of the free end and a side wall of the cantilever structure of the elastic hook 8 and the anti-off boss; and a distance from the anti-off boss to a bending point of the cantilever structure of the elastic hook 8 is less than a length of an inclined bending structure at the free end of the elastic hook 8 (see Figs. 3-5). Regarding claim 10: Saba teaches all the limitations of claim 2 and further teaches wherein a plurality of patterns 19, 30-32 that make friction with fingers and lock and unlock indicators are defined on a side wall of the operating handle 15; the operating handle comprises an arcuate stepped surface to facilitate a swinging motion, and a curvature of the arcuate stepped surface matches that of human fingertips (see Figs. 1-). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see PTO-892 for pertinent prior art, the following references being of closest relevance: Mumper (US 2011/0195591) teaches a plug and socket connector comprising an elastic hook within and a member to ensure and maintain the mechanical connection; Xiang (US 2025/0219315) teaches a plug and socket connector comprising an elastic hook within and a member to ensure and maintain the mechanical connection but its filing date does not permit the reference to be used as prior art; Tabor (US 6,012,945) teaches a plug and socket connector comprising an elastic hook within and a member to ensure and maintain the mechanical connection; Kawase (US 6,383,009) teaches a plug and socket connector comprising an elastic hook within and a member to ensure and maintain the mechanical connection; Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSCAR C JIMENEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-0272. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Han can be reached at (571) 272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OSCAR C JIMENEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 06, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597746
HIGH POWER COAXIAL ADAPTERS AND CONNECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597724
CONNECTOR MODULE AND ASSEMBLY METHOD THEREOF WITH PRESSING BLOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588709
AEROSOL GENERATING CONSUMABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592510
CONNECTOR HAVING RESILENT PORTION FOR PRESSING TERMINAL FITTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592509
Connection Unit
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month