Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 20, 2026
Application No. 18/434,845

INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Priority
Jul 14, 2023 — JP 2023-115646
Examiner
NGUYEN, PHILLIP H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
549 granted / 606 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
619
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the filing date of 2/7/2024. Claims 1-8 are pending and have been considered below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim recites “…transmit to the apparatus inspection firmware for investigating…”, it’s unclear whether the same “inspection firmware” to which the firmware possessed by the apparatus has been updated or a different inspection firmware. For examination purposes, examiner interprets this limitation to read as “…transmit to the apparatus, different inspection firmware for investigating…” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Pub. No. 20070285689 to Hozumi. Per claims 1, 7 and 8, Hozumi teaches an information processing system comprising: a processor configured to: if a malfunction occurs in an apparatus, transmit, to the apparatus, inspection firmware for collecting a log for investigating the malfunction and cause the apparatus to update firmware possessed by the apparatus to the inspection firmware (see at least paragraphs [0069-0070] “…transmits the log enriched version firmware to the image printing apparatus 10 that has…Upon receiving the log enriched version firmware with the instruction, the firmware updating device 12 of the image printing apparatus 10 updates and stores the log enriched version firmware in the firmware storage device 14…”). Per claim 2, Hozumi further teaches: wherein the processor is configured to: if the apparatus does not possess the inspection firmware, transmit the inspection firmware to the apparatus (see at least paragraphs [0067-0069] “…when the bug countermeasure policy designates updating to firmware enabling to pick up an increased number of analysis use debug logs (herein below, referred to as enriched version firmware), the mediation apparatus requests the log enriched version firmware to the center system 20…Upon receiving the request, the center system 20 reads and provides the log enriched version firmware from the firmware storage device 23 to the mediation apparatus 30 as a requester (i.e., downloading of firmware)… transmits the log enriched version firmware to the image printing apparatus 10…”). . Per claim 3, Hozumi further teaches: a memory configured to: store a plurality of different pieces of inspection firmware in advance, wherein the processor is configured to: transmit to the apparatus a piece of inspection firmware associated with the malfunction out of the plurality of different pieces of inspection firmware (see at least paragraph [0027] “…a firmware storage device 23 that stores several kinds of firmware used by the image printing apparatus 10…”). Per claim 4, Hozumi further teaches: wherein the processor is configured to: if a second malfunction different from a first malfunction occurs in the apparatus, the first malfunction being associated with the inspection firmware to which the firmware possessed by the apparatus has been updated, transmit to the apparatus inspection firmware for investigating the first malfunction and the second malfunction and cause the apparatus to update firmware possessed by the apparatus (see at least paragraphs [0070 – 0083] “… the firmware updating device 12 of the image printing apparatus 10 updates and stores the log enriched version firmware in the firmware storage device 14… The image printing apparatus 10 is then rebooted… The mediation apparatus 30 requests the image printing apparatus 10 to acquire debug log when collection of debug log is designated as a bug countermeasure policy corresponding to the report of the image printing apparatus 10… Upon detecting elapse of the debug log collection time period after starting collection of the debug log as defined in the bug countermeasure policy, the mediation apparatus 30 requests the center system 20 to provided the newest firmware… transmits the newest to the image printing apparatus 10 along with an instruction of updating the firmware”). Per claim 5, Hozumi further teaches: wherein the inspection firmware has a function of performing a different process depending on a constituent possessed by the apparatus (see at least paragraph [0032] “The bug countermeasure policy may also include updating to log collection use special firmware (firmware specialized in a function of collecting debug log) and then collecting debug log. Further, when bug countermeasure policy includes collection of debug log, a collection time period, such as one-month, snap shot, a week, etc., is registered”). Per claim 6, Hozumi further teaches: wherein the inspection firmware has a function of performing a different process depending on whether the apparatus possesses a specific constituent (see at least paragraph [0032] “The bug countermeasure policy may also include updating to log collection use special firmware (firmware specialized in a function of collecting debug log) and then collecting debug log. Further, when bug countermeasure policy includes collection of debug log, a collection time period, such as one-month, snap shot, a week, etc., is registered”). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US20030131083 relates to updating firmware possessed by an apparatus. US20090161143 relates to updating firmware possessed by an apparatus. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILLIP H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1070. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wei Zhen can be reached at (571) 272-3708. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILLIP H NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2191
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737278
DETECTING AND OPTIMIZING PROGRAM WORKLOAD INEFFICIENCIES AT RUNTIME
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730624
ADVANCED IDENTITY ONBOARDING
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730626
UPDATING FIRMWARE OF A COMPUTING PERIPHERAL AT A DOCKING STATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724600
program update method, program update system and mobile object
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717553
FLEXIBLE HIERARCHICAL RULE EVALUATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month