Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/435,053

Simulative Middle-Finger Amusement Device

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Examiner
AWAD, AMR A
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
27%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
41%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 27% of cases
27%
Career Allow Rate
15 granted / 56 resolved
-35.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 56 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (US patent 6926580) in view of Cameron et al. (US patent 7695342; hereinafter Cameron). Wang (fig. 1) teaches A simulative middle-finger amusement device (rotation or flipping bird 50 as shown in fig. 6) comprising: a body; an axle (shaft 41 in figure 2); Wang does not expressly teach a spring. However, in the same field, Cameron teaches a realistic grasping and standing movements toy that includes bird 12 (fig. 1) and a spring (36). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the invention to include the teaching of Cameron to include spring in the structure of Wang’s device so as motivated by Cameron, to provide realistic movement of the bird (title) As to claim 2, both Wang and Cameron teach the simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 1, wherein the body resembles a branch (see fig. 1). As to claim 3, Wang teaches the simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 1, wherein the axle resembles a branch (43 of figure 2). As to claim 4, Wang teaches the simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 1, wherein the axle rotates 360 degrees relative to the horizontal axis of the body (see figure 6). As to claim 5, Wang teaches a spindle to rotate the and does not expressly teach the simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 1, wherein the axle is rotated by pressing the button. Examiner takes an official notice that replacing a spindle with a button is well known in the art and would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have other option to activate the toy. As to claim 6. he simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 1, wherein the foot removably attaches to the axle. As to claim 7, the claim is substantially similar to claim 1 and is rejected substantially similar to claim 1 except for the limitations of having a base which is also taught by Wang (casing 20) and fastener (branch segment 48) As to claim 8, Cameron teaches the simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 7, wherein the fastener (shown in fig. 5) is positioned on a bottom surface of the base (fig. 6). As to claim 9, the simulative middle-finger amusement device of claim 7, wherein the fastener is comprised of a suction cup, an adhesive, or a magnet. Examiner takes an official notice that using magnet or suction cup is well know in the art to connect the toy to the base. As to claim 10, see rejection of claim 2 above. As to claim 11, see the rejection of claim 3 above. As to claim 12, see the rejection of claim 4 above. As to claim 13, see the rejection of claim 5 above. As to claim 14, see the rejection of claim 6 above. 15. A method of using a simulative middle-finger amusement device, the method comprising the following steps: providing a simulative middle-finger amusement device comprised of a base, a bird, and a body comprised of a rotating axle; attaching the base to a surface via a fastener of the base; attaching the bird to the axle via a foot of the bird and placing the body into a receiving area of the base; and pressing the button to spin the axle. As to claim 16, see rejection of claim 9 As to claim 17, see the rejection of claim 8 above. As to claims 18-19, see the rejection of claims 2-3 above As to claim 20, see the rejection of claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hisashi Suzuki (US patent No. 3199248) teaches an animated talking toy with built in recorder. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMR A AWAD whose telephone number is (571)272-7764. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMR A AWAD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604268
SIGNAL MONITORING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581006
WIRELESS MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567174
REAL-TIME POSE ESTIMATION THROUGH BIPARTITE MATCHING OF HEATMAPS OF JOINTS AND PERSONS AND DISPLAY OF VISUALIZATIONS BASED ON THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12505779
DISPLAY METHOD APPLIED TO DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12451062
PIXEL DRIVE CIRCUIT AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
27%
Grant Probability
41%
With Interview (+14.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 56 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month