Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/435,647

PRINTING MEDIUM AND TAPE CARTRIDGE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 07, 2024
Examiner
FEGGINS, KRISTAL J
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
832 granted / 923 resolved
+22.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
942
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§102
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 923 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions 2. Claims 6 & 8 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 10/28/2025. 3. Applicant's election with traverse of species in the reply filed on 10/28/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the subject matter of all species is sufficiently related that a thorough search for the subject matter of any one species would encompass a search for the subject matter of the remaining species. This is not found persuasive because the inventions have acquired a separate status in the art due to their recognized divergent subject matter; and the inventions require a different field of search (for example employing different search queries or searching different classes/subclasses). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claim(s) 1, 2-4 & 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Inoue Harumitsu et al. (JP 2017024329). Inoue Harumitsu et al. disclose the following: * Re clms 1 & 7, a printing medium/print receiving tape 50, printing sheet 52/ (Abst, figs 5 & 10); * a transparent backing sheet/release sheet 54 having an upper and lower surface having light transmissivity, some light pass through/ (Abst., figs 5B, 10-12); * a plurality of label portions/label main body portion 91, winding portion 90, upper and lower surfaces of release sheet 54/ adhered to the backing sheet in a line in a length direction of the backing sheet/release sheet 54/ (Abst., see section pertaining to specific examples of landmarks 1-3, figs 5B, 10-12); * a plurality of first transparent regions/label main body portion 91, winding portion 90/ provided in a plurality of inter-label regions between the plurality of label portions and having a lower transparency/less light to no light passes through; print surfaces 16A & 17A are not of a light transmissivity, see figs 6-8 & 10/ than the backing sheet/release sheet 54, has a light transmissivity/ (see section pertaining to specific examples of landmarks 1-3, figs 5B, 10-12); * a plurality of second transparent regions/upper surfaces of release sheet 54/ provided in the plurality of inter-label regions in such a way as to be adjacent to the first transparent regions/90, 91/ in the length direction of the backing sheet/release sheet 54/, and formed by the backing sheet/release sheet 54/ (see section pertaining to specific examples of landmarks 1-3, figs 5A, 5B, 10-12). * Re clm 2, wherein a detection point/sensor mark 59/, which is a boundary between each of the first transparent regions and a corresponding one of the second transparent regions, extends in a width direction of the backing sheet (fig 5A). * Re clm 3, wherein a plurality of adhering portions/adhesive layer 52A/ positioned in the plurality of inter-label regions and adhered to the backing sheet are included as the plurality of first transparent regions (see specific examples of landmarks 1, figs 5A & 5B). cl* Re clm 4, wherein the plurality of adhering portions/adhesive layer 51A/ are made of a different material from the plurality of label portions (figs 5A & 5B). * Further re clm 7, a tape cartridge (Abst., figs 1-3); * a cartridge case housing/casing 120/ the printing medium/printing tape 50/, (Abst., see cartridge structure, figs 1-3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 7. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 8. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Inoue Harumitsu et al. (JP 2017024329) in view of Tomoyuki Kubota et al. (WO 2016158710). Inoue Harumitsu et al. disclose the following: * Re clm 5, having a lower transparency/label main body portion 91, winding portion 90, areas are not of a light transmissivity/ than the second transparent regions/release sheet 54, upper surface layer; areas have a light transmissivity/, are included as the plurality of first transparent regions (see section pertaining to specific examples of landmarks 1-3). Inoue Harumitsu et al. does not disclose the following: * Re clm 5, wherein a plurality of backing sheet deformed portions, which are portions of the backing sheet deformed in a thickness direction of the backing sheet Tomoyuki Kubota et al. disclose the following: * Re clm 5, wherein a plurality of backing sheet/non label portions 12, 14, 15/ deformed portions/12/, which are portions of the backing sheet deformed in a thickness direction of the backing sheet (see Description of Embodiments, fig 2). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to utilize wherein a plurality of backing sheet deformed portions, which are portions of the backing sheet deformed in a thickness direction of the backing sheet, taught by Tomoyuki Kubota et al. into Inoue Harumitsu et al. for the purpose of preventing wrinkles from being generated on the printing tape. Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRISTAL FEGGINS whose telephone number is (571)272-2254. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 930-530pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricardo Magallanes can be reached at 571-272-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRISTAL FEGGINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600154
PRINTER APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600132
HEAD CHIP, LIQUID JET HEAD, LIQUID JET RECORDING DEVICE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING HEAD CHIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600122
LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD AND RECORDING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600146
CONTROL DEVICE, PRINTER APPARATUS, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600135
POLYMER BASED CONDUCTIVE PATHS FOR FLUIDIC DIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 923 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month