Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 25, 2026
Application No. 18/436,693

RESOURCE REPORTING FOR INTEGRATED ACCESS AND BACKHAUL RADIO ACCESS DUAL CONNECTIVITY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 08, 2024
Priority
Sep 14, 2020 — provisional 63/078,171 +1 more
Examiner
O CONNOR, BRIAN T
Art Unit
2465
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
753 granted / 885 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
924
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 885 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to Applicant’s preliminary amendment filed on 08/29/2025. Claims 2-31 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 2, 8, 9, 10, 15, 17, 23, 24, 25, and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Huang et al. (US 2023/0337005 A1; hereafter HUANG). With respect to claim 2, HUANG discloses an apparatus (DU and MT of IAB node in middle of FIG. 5) for communication at a network (RAN 339 of FIG. 3) node (IAB node in middle of FIG. 5), comprising: one or more memories (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]) storing processor-executable code (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]); and one or more processors (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]) coupled with the one or more memories (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]), at least one processor of the one or more processors configured to cause the network node (IAB node in middle of FIG. 5) to: receive, from an integrated access and backhaul (IAB) donor central unit (CU) (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), first information indicating a first resource used by an IAB node that has a first connection with a first parent IAB node and a second connection with a second parent IAB node (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); transmit, to the second parent IAB node, the first information (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); and transmit, to the IAB donor CU (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), second information indicating a second resource to be used by the IAB node (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9). With respect to claim 8, HUANG further discloses 8. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein at least one processor of the one or more processors is further configured to cause the network node to: modify a cell resource configuration of a cell served by the second parent IAB node in accordance with the first information (1010, 1020, 1030, 1040, 1050, 1060, 1070, 1080 of FIG. 10). With respect to claim 9, HUANG further discloses 9. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the network node is an F1-terminating donor (IAB node in middle has a DU and stops a F1 connection of FIG. 5). With respect to claim 10, HUANG discloses an apparatus (DU and MT of IAB node in middle of FIG. 5) for communication at a network node (IAB node in middle has a DU and stops a F1 connection of FIG. 5), comprising: one or more memories (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]) storing processor-executable code (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]); and one or more processors (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]) coupled with the one or more memories (paragraphs [0126] and [0127]), at least one processor of the one or more processors configured to cause the network node to: receive, from an integrated access and backhaul (IAB) donor central unit (CU) (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5) that is associated with a first parent IAB node, a request associated with an IAB node that has a first connection with the first parent IAB node and a second connection with a second parent IAB node (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); transmit, to the IAB donor CU (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), first information indicating a first resource to be used by the IAB node on the first connection (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); and receive, from the IAB donor CU (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), second information indicating a second resource to be used by the IAB node on the second connection (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9). With respect to claim 15, HUANG further discloses 15. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the network node is a non-F1-terminating donor (IAB node in middle has a DU and carries a F1 connection to the left IAB node of FIG. 5). With respect to claim 17, HUANG discloses a method of wireless communication performed at a network node, comprising: receiving, from an integrated access and backhaul (IAB) donor central unit (CU) (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), first information indicating a first resource used by an IAB node that has a first connection with a first parent IAB node and a second connection with a second parent IAB node (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); transmitting, to the second parent IAB node, the first information (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); and transmitting, to the IAB donor CU (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), second information indicating a second resource to be used by the IAB node (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9). With respect to claim 23, HUANG further discloses 23. The method of claim 17, comprising: modifying a cell resource configuration of a cell served by the second parent IAB node in accordance with the first information (1010, 1020, 1030, 1040, 1050, 1060, 1070, 1080 of FIG. 10). With respect to claim 24, HUANG further discloses 24. The method of claim 17, wherein the network node is an F1-terminating donor (IAB node in middle has a DU and stops a F1 connection of FIG. 5). With respect to claim 25, HUANG discloses a method of wireless communication performed at a network node, comprising: receiving, from an integrated access and backhaul (IAB) donor central unit (CU) (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5) that is associated with a first parent IAB node, a request associated with an IAB node that has a first connection with the first parent IAB node and a second connection with a second parent IAB node (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); transmitting, to the IAB donor CU (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), first information indicating a first resource to be used by the IAB node on the first connection (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9); and receiving, from the IAB donor CU (IAB donor with DU and CU of FIG. 5), second information indicating a second resource to be used by the IAB node on the second connection (910, 920, 930, 940, 950, 960, 965 of FIG. 9). With respect to claim 30, HUANG further discloses 30. The method of claim 25, wherein the network node is a non-F1-terminating donor (IAB node in middle has a DU and carries a F1 connection to the left IAB node of FIG. 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 11-14, 16, 18-22, 26-29 and 31 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian T O'Connor whose telephone number is (571)270-1081. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri Flex 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached at 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN T O CONNOR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465 April 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 08, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12610303
METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR CONTROLLING DOWNLINK TRANSMISSIONS IN INTEGRATED ACCESS AND BACKHAUL NETWORK
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12598515
NETWORK ENTITIES FOR ENHANCED QOS MONITORING
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12574177
IMPROVED TRIGGER FRAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557090
UPLINK CHANNEL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND BASE STATION, TERMINAL AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550129
TRIGGER BASED NULL DATA PACKET TRANSMISSION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.4%)
2y 11m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 885 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month