Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/436,738

Receiving Optical System, Lidar System, and Terminal Device

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 08, 2024
Priority
Aug 13, 2021 — continuation of PCTCN2021112524
Examiner
CHEN, CHIA-LING
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
18 granted / 34 resolved
-7.1% vs TC avg
Strong +55% interview lift
Without
With
+55.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
59
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
92.1%
+52.1% vs TC avg
§102
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 34 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 10, 15-16 and 19-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ishikawa (US 20180224530 A1, hereinafter “Ishikawa”). Regarding claim 1, Ishikawa teaches a receiving optical system, comprising: a receiving lens group comprising (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], a laser radar device 1 includes optical system 7 (equivalent to receiving lens group) and a light receiver 8. Both optical system 7 and a light receiver 8 equivalent to a receiving optical system): a receiving mirror group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the optical system 7 includes a light receiving lens 70 (equivalent to receiving mirror)); and a focal power element comprising a one-dimensional focal power element or a two- dimensional focal power element (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the optical system 7 includes an optical element 71 (equivalent to a focal power element)), wherein the focal power element has a horizontal equivalent focal power and a vertical equivalent focal power, and wherein the horizontal equivalent focal power and the vertical equivalent focal power are different (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0056], the optical element 71 included in the first aspect of the optical system allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted from the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8. Implies the x/y direction have different focal power), wherein the receiving lens group is configured to: receive an echo signal that is based on a signal light from a transmitting optical system reflecting off of a target in a detection region (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], the laser beam 10 emitted from laser unit 2 to a measurement region R. The reflected light 11 is received by the optical system 7 and directs to light receiver 8); separate a horizontal focal plane from a vertical focal plane of the echo signal to obtain a modified echo signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0056], the optical element 71 included in the first aspect of the optical system allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted from the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8. Implies the x/y direction have different focal power which means the x/y direction focal plane is separated); and propagate the modified echo signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the reflected light 11 passing through the optical system 7 to be guided to the light receiver 8; the light flux 12 of the reflected light 11 incident on the light receiver 8 has a larger size in the y-direction than in the x-direction implies the echo signal is modified [0056]); and a detector configured to: receive the modified echo signal from the receiving lens group; and perform optical-electrical conversion on the modified echo signal in order to obtain an electrical signal, wherein the electrical signal indicates association information of the target (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], disclosed the function of the laser radar system 1 to detect the measurement region R; Fig. 3, [0037], the light receiver 8 includes four avalanche photodiodes 81 (has a light receiving face 82 that receives the reflected light 11 [0038]) formed on the substrate; avalanche photodiodes to perform optical-electrical conversion on the echo signal is well known in the art; [0003], such a laser radar device that employs a technique of measuring the distance to a detected object using a pulse laser beam deflected by a rotating deflector. Implies the laser radar system is used to measure the distance of the detected object). Regarding claim 3, Ishikawa teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 1, wherein when the focal power element comprises the one-dimensional focal power element, the one- dimensional focal power element comprises at least one of a one-dimensional cylindrical mirror, a one-dimensional wedge, or a one-dimensional grating, and wherein when the focal power element comprises the two-dimensional focal power element, the two- dimensional focal power element comprises at least one of a ring mirror, a two- dimensional cylindrical mirror, a saddle mirror, a two-dimensional grating, or a two-dimensional wedge (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0055], the optical element 71 is, for example, a cylinder lens or a diffraction grating). Regarding claim 4, Ishikawa teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 1, wherein the focal power element is located on an object side of the receiving mirror group, wherein the focal power element is located between the receiving mirror group and the detector, or wherein the focal power element is located between any two adjacent receiving mirrors in the receiving mirror group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0054], the optical element 71 is disposed before the light receiving lens 70 in the z-direction (equivalent to located on an object side), allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction). Regarding claim 5, Ishikawa teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 1, wherein the detector is located on the vertical focal plane, and wherein the horizontal equivalent focal power is greater than the vertical equivalent focal power (Ishikawa; Fig. 3, [0037], a plan view of the light receiver 8 which is located on the x-y plane; Fig. 9, [0054]-[0056], the optical element 71 is disposed before the light receiving lens 70 in the z-direction, allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted form the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 (in other word, defocusing is made only in the y-direction and not x-direction). This implies the y-direction equivalent focal power is greater than the x-direction equivalent focal power and the light receiver is located on the x-direction focal plane). Regarding claim 10, Ishikawa teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 1, wherein the detector is located on the horizontal focal plane, and wherein the vertical equivalent focal power of the focal power element is greater than the horizontal equivalent focal power of the focal power element (Ishikawa; Fig. 3, [0037], a plan view of the light receiver 8 which is located on the x-y plane; Fig. 9, [0054]-[0056], the optical element 71 is disposed before the light receiving lens 70 in the z-direction, allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted form the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 (in other word, defocusing is made only in the y-direction and not x-direction). This implies the y-direction equivalent focal power is greater than the x-direction equivalent focal power and the light receiver is located on the x-direction focal plane). Though Ishikawa‘s invention is only in y-direction and didn’t disclosed the optical element 71 to have equivalent focal power in x-direction is greater than that in y-direction and the detector is disposed in y-direction, MPEP § 2144.04 VI C Rearrangement of Pars states that the particular placement of a contact in a conductivity measuring device was held to be an obvious matter of design choice (MEPE § 2144.04 VI C: Rearrangement of Parts). A person skill in the art would recognize to put the optical element 71 in 90 degree to perform the same operation in x-direction with success. Regarding claim 15, Ishikawa teaches a lidar system, comprising: a transmitting optical system configured to transmit a signal light (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], [0029], a laser radar device includes a laser unit 2 emitting a laser beam 10); and a receiving optical system comprising (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], a laser radar device 1 includes optical system 7 (equivalent to receiving lens group) and a light receiver 8. Both optical system 7 and a light receiver 8 equivalent to a receiving optical system): a receiving lens group comprising (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], a laser radar device 1 includes optical system 7 (equivalent to receiving lens group)): a receiving mirror group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the optical system 7 includes a light receiving lens 70 (equivalent to receiving mirror)); and a focal power element comprising a one-dimensional focal power element or a two-dimensional focal power element (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the optical system 7 includes an optical element 71 (equivalent to a focal power element)), wherein the focal power element has a horizontal equivalent focal power and a vertical equivalent focal power, and wherein the horizontal equivalent focal power and the vertical equivalent focal power are different (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0056], the optical element 71 included in the first aspect of the optical system allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted from the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8. Implies the x/y direction have different focal power), wherein the receiving lens group is configured to: receive an echo signal that is based on the signal light reflecting off of a target in a detection region (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], the laser beam 10 emitted from laser unit 2 to a measurement region R. The reflected light 11 is received by the optical system 7 and directs to light receiver 8); separate a horizontal focal plane from a vertical focal plane of the echo signal to obtain a modified echo signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0056], the optical element 71 included in the first aspect of the optical system allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted from the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8. Implies the x/y direction have different focal power which means the x/y direction focal plane is separated); and propagate the modified echo signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the reflected light 11 passing through the optical system 7 to be guided to the light receiver 8; the light flux 12 of the reflected light 11 incident on the light receiver 8 has a larger size in the y-direction than in the x-direction implies the echo signal is modified [0056]); and a detector configured to: receive the modified echo signal from the receiving lens group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the reflected light 11 passing through the optical system 7 to be guided to the light receiver 8); and perform optical-electrical conversion on the modified echo signal in order to obtain an electrical signal, and wherein the electrical signal indicates association information of the target (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], disclosed the function of the laser radar system 1 to detect the measurement region R; Fig. 3, [0037], the light receiver 8 includes four avalanche photodiodes 81 (has a light receiving face 82 that receives the reflected light 11 [0038]) formed on the substrate; avalanche photodiodes to perform optical-electrical conversion on the echo signal is well known in the art; [0003], such a laser radar device that employs a technique of measuring the distance to a detected object using a pulse laser beam deflected by a rotating deflector. Implies the laser radar system is used to measure the distance of the detected object). Regarding claim 16, Ishikawa teaches the lidar system as recited in claim 15, further comprising a processor coupled to the receiving optical system (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0031], the controller 3 controls the total operation of the laser radar device 1 and includes a central processing unit (CPU), a random access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM and a laser diode driver. Fig. 1 shows the light receiver 8 sends the signal to controller for further processing) and configured to: receive the electrical signal from the receiving optical system (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the reflected light 11 passing through the optical system 7 to be guided to the light receiver 8); and determine the association information of the target based on the electrical signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], disclosed the function of the laser radar system 1 to detect the measurement region R; Fig. 3, [0037], the light receiver 8 includes four avalanche photodiodes 81 (has a light receiving face 82 that receives the reflected light 11 [0038]) formed on the substrate; avalanche photodiodes to perform optical-electrical conversion on the echo signal is well known in the art; [0003], such a laser radar device that employs a technique of measuring the distance to a detected object using a pulse laser beam deflected by a rotating deflector. Implies the laser radar system is used to measure the distance of the detected object). Regarding claim 19, Ishikawa teaches the lidar system as recited in claim 15, further comprising a scanner, wherein the scanner comprises one or more of a rotating mirror, a swing mirror, and a micro-electro- mechanical system (MEMS} mirror (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], a laser radar device 1 includes a scanning unit 5 which includes a polygon mirror 50 (rotated by motor 51) or a Galvano-mirror or a MEMS mirror). Regarding claim 20, Ishikawa teaches a terminal device comprising: a lidar system (Ishikawa; Fig. 4, [0038], an external appearance of a laser radar device 1 includes a housing 9) comprising: a transmitting optical system configured to transmit a signal light (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], [0029], a laser radar device includes a laser unit 2 emitting a laser beam 10); and a receiving optical system (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], a laser radar device 1 includes optical system 7 (equivalent to receiving lens group) and a light receiver 8. Both optical system 7 and a light receiver 8 equivalent to a receiving optical system) comprising: a receiving lens group (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0028], a laser radar device 1 includes optical system 7 (equivalent to receiving lens group)) comprising: a receiving mirror group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the optical system 7 includes a light receiving lens 70 (equivalent to receiving mirror)); and a focal power element comprising a one-dimensional focal power element or a two-dimensional focal power element (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the optical system 7 includes an optical element 71 (equivalent to a focal power element)), wherein the focal power element has a horizontal equivalent focal power and a vertical equivalent focal power, and wherein the horizontal equivalent focal power and the vertical equivalent focal power are different (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0056], the optical element 71 included in the first aspect of the optical system allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted from the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8. Implies the x/y direction have different focal power), wherein the receiving lens group is configured to: receive an echo signal that is based on the signal light reflecting off of a target in a detection region (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], the laser beam 10 emitted from laser unit 2 to a measurement region R. The reflected light 11 is received by the optical system 7 and directs to light receiver 8); separate a horizontal focal plane from a vertical focal plane of the echo signal to obtain a modified echo signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0056], the optical element 71 included in the first aspect of the optical system allows the reflected light 11 to pass through and has positive power only in the y-direction. Thus, the focus point 13a for the y-direction of the optical system 7 can be shifted from the surface 80 of the light receiver 8 to a point before the surface 80 with the focus point 13b for the x-direction of the optical system 7 on the surface 80 of the light receiver 8. Implies the x/y direction have different focal power which means the x/y direction focal plane is separated); and propagate the modified echo signal (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the reflected light 11 passing through the optical system 7 to be guided to the light receiver 8; the light flux 12 of the reflected light 11 incident on the light receiver 8 has a larger size in the y-direction than in the x-direction implies the echo signal is modified [0056]); and a detector configured to: receive the modified echo signal from the receiving lens group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0052], the reflected light 11 passing through the optical system 7 to be guided to the light receiver 8); and perform optical-electrical conversion on the modified echo signal in order to obtain an electrical signal, and wherein the electrical signal determines association information of the target (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0036], disclosed the function of the laser radar system 1 to detect the measurement region R; Fig. 3, [0037], the light receiver 8 includes four avalanche photodiodes 81 (has a light receiving face 82 that receives the reflected light 11 [0038]) formed on the substrate; avalanche photodiodes to perform optical-electrical conversion on the echo signal is well known in the art; [0003], such a laser radar device that employs a technique of measuring the distance to a detected object using a pulse laser beam deflected by a rotating deflector. Implies the laser radar system is used to measure the distance of the detected object). Regarding claim 21, Ishikawa teaches the terminal device of claim 20, wherein the focal power element is located on an object side of the receiving mirror group, wherein the focal power element is located between the receiving mirror group and the detector, or wherein the focal power element is located between any two adjacent receiving mirrors in the receiving mirror group (Ishikawa; Fig. 9, [0054], the optical element is disposed before the light receiving lens 70 in the z-direction; [0055], the optical element 71 may be disposed behind the light receiving lens 70). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6-7 and 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishikawa, modified in view of Hansson et al. (US 20190146064 A1, hereinafter “Hansson”). Regarding claim 6, Ishikawa teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 5. Ishikawa does not teach, further comprising a first stop located on the horizontal focal plane. Hansson teaches, further comprising a first stop located on the horizontal focal plane (Hansson; Fig. 3, [0052], light 125 returning from region 106 impinges on lens 120. Mask 124 (implemented in the form of a 2D array of slits, Fig. 4, [0051]) is placed at the focal plane of lens 120, such that light 125 is focused at mask 124). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of this invention to modify the receiving optical system taught by Ishikawa to include further comprising a first stop located on the horizontal focal plane taught by Hansson with a reasonable expectation of success. The reasoning for this is using mask with 2D array of slits which placed in front of detector array and on the focal plane of lens such that to reduce the ambient light reaching detector array. This results in increased SNR and increased dynamic range (Hansson; [0044], [0051]-[0052]). Regarding claim 7, Ishikawa as modified above teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 6. Ishikawa does not teach, wherein a shape of the first stop is a rectangle having a short side and a long side, wherein the short side of the first stop is parallel to a first direction corresponding to the horizontal focal plane, and wherein the long side of the first stop is parallel to a second direction corresponding to the vertical focal plane. Hansson disclosed in Fig. 4, Fig. 5, paragraph [0054], mask 124 includes slits 142a-142h is associated with returning light generated by a respective one of the eight lasers in one of the vertical linear arrays of the lasers in source 104; [0056], eight rows of four detectors 126a are illustrated and the received pulses of light 125 returning from region after being focused by lens 120 and passing through slits 142 in mask 124. Clearly seen the slit is rectangle in shape and long side is align in horizontal direction and short side is align in vertical direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of this invention to modify the receiving optical system taught by Ishikawa to include further comprising a first stop located on the horizontal focal plane; wherein a shape of the first stop is a rectangle having a short side and a long side, wherein the short side of the first stop is parallel to a first direction corresponding to the horizontal focal plane, and wherein the long side of the first stop is parallel to a second direction corresponding to the vertical focal plane taught by Hansson with a reasonable expectation of success. The reasoning for this is using mask with 2D array of slits which placed in front of detector array such that to reduce the ambient light reaching detector array. This results in increased SNR and increased dynamic range. Furthermore, the mask includes a set of slits and is aligned with the scan pattern of the transmitter which enable the use of avalanche photodiode detectors in the optical detector array (Hansson; [0043]-[0044], [0051]-[0052]). Regarding claim 11, Ishikawa teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 10. Ishikawa does not teach, further comprising a second stop located on the vertical focal plane. Hansson teaches, further comprising a second stop located on the vertical focal plane (Hansson; Fig. 3, [0052], light 125 returning from region 106 impinges on lens 120. Mask 124 (implemented in the form of a 2D array of slits, Fig. 4, [0051]) is placed at the focal plane of lens 120, such that light 125 is focused at mask 124). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of this invention to modify the receiving optical system taught by Ishikawa to include further comprising a second stop located on the vertical focal plane taught by Hansson with a reasonable expectation of success. The reasoning for this is using mask with 2D array of slits which placed in front of detector array such that to reduce the ambient light reaching detector array. This results in increased SNR and increased dynamic range (Hansson; [0044], [0051]-[0052]). Regarding claim 12, Ishikawa as modified above teaches the receiving optical system as recited in claim 11. Ishikawa does not teach, wherein a shape of the second stop is a rectangle having a short side and a long side, wherein the short side of the second stop is parallel to a first direction corresponding to the vertical focal plane, and wherein the long side of the second stop is parallel to a second direction corresponding to the horizontal focal plane. Hansson disclosed in Fig. 4, Fig. 5, paragraph [0054], mask 124 includes slits 142a-142h is associated with returning light generated by a respective one of the eight lasers in one of the vertical linear arrays of the lasers in source 104; [0056], eight rows of four detectors 126a are illustrated and the received pulses of light 125 returning from region after being focused by lens 120 and passing through slits 142 in mask 124. Clearly seen the slit is rectangle in shape and long side is align in horizontal direction and short side is align in vertical direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of this invention to modify the receiving optical system taught by Ishikawa to include further comprising a second stop located on the vertical focal plane; wherein a shape of the second stop is a rectangle having a short side and a long side, wherein the short side of the second stop is parallel to a first direction corresponding to the vertical focal plane, and wherein the long side of the second stop is parallel to a second direction corresponding to the horizontal focal plane taught by Hansson with a reasonable expectation of success. The reasoning for this is using mask with 2D array of slits which placed in front of detector array such that to reduce the ambient light reaching detector array. This results in increased SNR and increased dynamic range. Furthermore, the mask includes a set of slits and is aligned with the scan pattern of the transmitter which enable the use of avalanche photodiode detectors in the optical detector array (Hansson; [0043]-[0044], [0051]-[0052]). Claim(s) 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishikawa, modified in view of Pacala et al. (US 20190011567 A1, hereinafter “Pacala”). Regarding claim 17, Ishikawa teaches the lidar system as recited in claim 15, wherein the transmitting optical system comprises a light source array (Ishikawa; Fig. 1, [0030], the laser unit 2 including a light emitter 20 that emits a pulse laser beam 10. A plurality of single mode semiconductor lasers or a plurality of fiber lasers may be used to form a laser beam 10), wherein the detector comprises a pixel array (Ishikawa; Fig. 3, [0037], light receiver 8 includes four avalanche photodiodes 81 are formed to be disposed in an array at a predetermined interval on the semiconductor substrate). Ishikawa does not teach, wherein when the light source array is gated by row, the pixel array is gated by row, and wherein when the light source array is gated by column, the pixel array is gated by column. Pacala disclosed in Fig. 11, Fig. 12, paragraph [0166], column selecting circuitry 1104 can be configured to operate in synchronization with the drivers in the light emission system so that the selected column in sensor array 1102 can correspond to the activated column in the emitter array as discussed herein with respect to Figs. 2 and 3; [0169] disclosed row selecting circuitry 1204 which have same configuration and operation as column selecting circuitry 1140 in Fig. 11, but operates to select photosensors by row instead of column. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of this invention to modify the lidar system taught by Ishikawa to include wherein when the light source array is gated by row, the pixel array is gated by row, and wherein when the light source array is gated by column, the pixel array is gated by column taught by Pacala with a reasonable expectation of success. The reasoning for this using column/row selecting circuitry to operate in synchronization with the drivers in the light emission system so that the selected column/row in sensor array can correspond to the activated column/row in the emitter array (Pacala; [0166], [0169]). Regarding claim 18, Ishikawa as modified above teaches the lidar system as recited in claim 17, wherein the pixel array comprises at least two merged light sensitive units (Ishikawa; Fig. 3, [0037], the light receiver 8 includes four avalanche photodiodes 81; Fig. 9, clearly seen the light flux 12 is detected by two avalanche photodiodes 81). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-9 and 13-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 8, the prior art of record does not explicitly teach nor render obvious the following element, along with all other claimed feature: wherein a length Li of the short side satisfies the following formula: L1= Horizontal angular resolution of the receiving optical system x Equivalent focal length in a horizontal direction of the receiving optical system. Regarding claim 9, the prior art of record does not explicitly teach nor render obvious the following element, along with all other claimed feature: wherein a length L2 of the long side satisfies the following formula: L2> Vertical angle of view of the receiving optical system x Equivalent focal length in a vertical direction of the receiving optical system. Regarding claim 13, the prior art of record does not explicitly teach nor render obvious the following element, along with all other claimed feature: wherein a length L3 of the short side of the second stop satisfies the following formula: L3 = Vertical angular resolution of the receiving optical system x Equivalent focal length in a vertical direction of the receiving optical system. Regarding claim 14, the prior art of record does not explicitly teach nor render obvious the following element, along with all other claimed feature: wherein a length L4 of the long side of the second stop satisfies the following formula: L4> Horizontal angle of view of the receiving optical system x Equivalent focal length in a horizontal direction of the receiving optical system. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Argo Al (US 20220155497 A1) disclosed in Fig. 2A, 2B, paragraph [0032], two cylindrical lenses C1 and C2 are positioned next to the lens L along the z-axis. Lens C1 may be a negative cylindrical lens and lens C2 may be a positive cylindrical lens which may shortening the focal length fx along x-axis than the focal length fy along y-axis. Such that the lidar system is associated with a first focal length in a first direction associated with a scene FoV, and a second focal length in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction and associated with an instantaneous FoV. Gnecchi et al. (US 20180164413 A1) disclosed in Fig. 4, paragraph [0023]-[0031], the aperture stop has dimensions to match the required angle of view according to PNG media_image1.png 85 211 media_image1.png Greyscale Where Focal length of receiver lens: f Sensor angle of view: Өxy Aperture stop dimensions: Pxy Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHIA-LING CHEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1047. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 8-5 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuqing Xiao can be reached at (571)270-3630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHIA-LING CHEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3645 /YUQING XIAO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683623
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR OPERATING ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTERS IN AN ULTRASOUND DEVICE WITH TIMING DELAYS
5y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681181
MULTISPECTRAL ACTIVE REMOTE SENSOR
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681182
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AIRBORNE MAPPING LIDAR
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12656494
ESTIMATION OF A DISTANCE OFFSET IN AN INDIRECT TIME-OF-FLIGHT MEASUREMENT DEVICE, AND CORRESPONDING DEVICE
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12656495
IMAGING SYSTEM HAVING REDUCED ADC SAMPLING RATES
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+55.2%)
4y 1m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 34 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month